It won't have enough of an effect to matter in the war, not unless we paired it up with Build War Carts. The problem is that we need at least one pure Economy action which means either Expand Fishing or Step-Farms.So, people, before voting, what do you think about voting for pastures as a compromise between food and preparation to war?
Because I do not really want to vote before discussion.
Fuck no. We're staying far away from anything resembling cannibalism and human sacrifice.@Academia Nut can we make the punishment putting them in the Black Soil? Then use our mysticism Elders to spread the story that we're eating their souls?
They won't provide as much food back home, but they improve logistics and warfighting capabilities.
I fe like we should expand our warriors or charriets and take the hit to our economy anyway.
Well losing the war will likely mean we get pillaged and fucked and probably lose the game but ya.We will burn at the very least 1 Economy this turn, maybe 2. We are likely to go into negatives as it is even without pouring resources into this.
Of course, losing the war will tank economy much more, so maybe you have a point.
can we make the punishment putting them in the Black Soil? Then use our mysticism Elders to spread the story that we're eating their souls?
Well losing the war will likely mean we get pillaged and fucked and probably lose the game but ya.
We don't eat them directly. Instead, we erase them from the everything.Fuck no. We're staying far away from anything resembling cannibalism and human sacrifice.
Were guaranteed to lose our economy to zero, we need to expand our military so were most likely going into negativesIf we formalize leaving our enemies behind, it could lead to them being rescued and spilling information on our movements.
I feel that we shouldn't ask for aid from the Confederacy. It'll strain our economy past the breaking point (which we can't afford obviously). If we last just this turn without starving then the Blight will be fixed and our economy will rocket back to safety. If fight by our self and choose to expand pastures it won't tank our economy and will still provide more horses for the chariots.
Sending a War Mission will not burn any Economy at all. The food we spend on the warriors will be the same regardless of whether those warriors are fighting or guarding our lands.
Well losing the war will likely mean we get pillaged and fucked and probably lose the game but ya.
We don't eat them directly. Instead, we erase them from the everything.
We don't eat them directly. Instead, we erase them from the everything.
If we expand our military we'll have even more people to feed that aren't making food. Why should we expand our warriors? If we take the Expand Pastures and don't ask for help from the WC it'll keep us from starving.Were guaranteed to lose our economy to zero, we need to expand our military so were most likely going into negatives
Well we have no choice, were going to lose income No Matter what. The blight will take us down at least One, any war effort is going to take another 1Getting too deep into negative economy can do the similar things, I feel.
Of course, negative Economy -> Stability hit -> Pioneers -> lower Centralization for Economy boost, so...
As I said, were guaranteed to go down no matter what, and this horde is going to fuck with our tradeIf we expand our military we'll have even more people to feed that aren't making food. Why should we expand our warriors? If we take the Expand Pastures and don't ask for help from the WC it'll keep us from starving.