@Academia Nut, which actions can we take to reduce sexism?

I think festivals with Heroic Admin leader can do it.
...
But after she does something worthy of those stats. To celebrate women being just as cool kings as men.
Next turn full admin+infrastructure, after next - festivals. Possibly double main, but we'll see.

[X] Random Admin tech upgrade
[X] Magwyna (-1 Stability, other effects, [Poor Martial, Heroic Admin and Diplo])
[X] New Trails (-1 Econ, +1 Diplo, +1 Centralization, other effects)
[X] Take in some (Chance of stability loss, +2 Econ)

[Next] [Main] More Boats
[Next] [Secondary] Change Policy - Infrastructure - to the north
[Next] [Secondary] Extended Projects - Aqueducts? More Trails?
 
Last edited:
[X] Random Admin tech upgrade
[X] Magwyna (-1 Stability, other effects, [Poor Martial, Heroic Admin and Diplo])
[X] Study Health (-1 Econ, greater chance of new discoveries)
[X] Take in some (Chance of stability loss, +2 Econ)
 
Forget it, Omegahugger's tired of holding his desires back!

[X] Reassure the People of their safety and prosperity (+1 Stability)
[X] Magwyna (-1 Stability, other effects, [Poor Martial, Heroic Admin and Diplo])
[X] Grand Sacrifice (-3 Econ, +2 Stability)
[X] Everyone can come on in! (-4 Stability, chance of further loss, +11-15 Econ, further effects, chance of over crowding, Upper Valleyhome attains True City status)

Friends!
 
Anyway, we absolutely should get that province next turn. The Dam would be very nice and give us good permanent boosts, but likely only on the scale of what the province would give us; an extra action every turn. Action count is the primary limitation on our growth in this quest.
The Dam is nice but not necessary; another province absolutely is if we care at all about maximizing our ability to do everything.

@Academia Nut
Does the Place to the Stars count as land management? (Triggering Divine Stewards)
 
I'd been under the impression that we'd still been having droughts and floods and crop failures and etc, they just 1. haven't been super-disasters, and 2. we've got good enough farming, organization, land management, and administration to not be affected much unless we get a bunch in a row, since we keep so much food in our granaries that in a normal year we've got literally as much food as we can store without it going bad stored away in case of problems. Is that accurate, @Academia Nut ?

Basically yeah. Not every year is a good year, but the People have mostly smoothed things out and everyone else lets the problems fall on their undesirables so there hasn't been major social disruption in a while.

which actions can we take to reduce sexism?

At this point?

You have no standard actions that would be able to help.
 
Forget it, Omegahugger's tired of holding his desires back!

[X] Reassure the People of their safety and prosperity (+1 Stability)
[X] Magwyna (-1 Stability, other effects, [Poor Martial, Heroic Admin and Diplo])
[X] Grand Sacrifice (-3 Econ, +2 Stability)
[X] Everyone can come on in! (-4 Stability, chance of further loss, +11-15 Econ, further effects, chance of over crowding, Upper Valleyhome attains True City status)

Friends!

Pls no grand sacrifice, without the Baby Boom it's suddenly super expensive
 
Anyway, we absolutely should get that province next turn. The Dam would be very nice and give us good permanent boosts, but likely only on the scale of what the province would give us; an extra action every turn. Action count is the primary limitation on our growth in this quest.
The Dam is nice but not necessary; another province absolutely is if we care at all about maximizing our ability to do everything.

@Academia Nut
Does the Place to the Stars count as land management? (Triggering Divine Stewards)

We care about negating our cultural drift issues more; as Saltern has shown, our ability to action-spam is already ridiculous and we should focus on keeping ourselves in one piece.

At this point?

You have no standard actions that would be able to help.

@Academia Nut , would, say, incredibly gifted female administrator making some (great, or at least good) deeds and then making a festival to celebrate women being just as good rulers as men help? Or would it result in the same backfire as Proclaim Glory?
 
Current tally:

Everything but Grand Sacrifice vs. New Trails is pretty certain. Grand Sacrifice currently has a small lead over New Trails.
Adhoc vote count started by pblur on May 10, 2017 at 2:37 PM, finished with 538 posts and 101 votes.

Adhoc vote count started by Candesce on May 10, 2017 at 3:23 PM, finished with 580 posts and 103 votes.
 
Last edited:
@Academia Nut, it's become clear as of the last update that our people believe in gods. Since when did that happen, how does that interact with their spirit worship, and what gods to they believe in?
 
would, say, incredibly gifted female administrator making some (great, or at least good) deeds and then making a festival to celebrate women being just as good rulers as men help? Or would it result in the same backfire as Proclaim Glory?

There is some potential for backfire via the "exception that proves the rule" effect, but yes, having a female reign over a golden age would help considerably at putting the idea of "female rulers = good" into people's minds. Whether or not that means all women is a bit murkier.

it's become clear as of the last update that our people believe in gods. Since when did that happen, how does that interact with their spirit worship, and what gods to they believe in?

The People's worship is... hmmm... probably best to think of it as being closer to Shintoism than the pop culture idea of classical polytheism. There are all sorts of spirits, spirits for everything, but some are obviously more important and powerful than others, and over the years the language has subtly shifted to distinguish between greater and lesser spirits, and I am translating this conception of "greater spirits" to be called "gods".
 
That just means what was required to do that project. Note the Kings tag and the lack of a Canal tag.

We care about negating our cultural drift issues more; as Saltern has shown, our ability to action-spam is already ridiculous and we should focus on keeping ourselves in one piece.
We're totally in one piece, that's what Stability 2+ means. Our action down there was heavily increased by the +3/turn that Baby Boom was giving us. Without that, we've lost a significant portion of our action equivalents. These past turns have also been boosted by Symphony since we were triple and quadruple maining the same action. We're going to switch back to a much more reasonable action per turn count now.
 
I think festivals with Heroic Admin leader can do it.
...
But after she does something worthy of those stats. To celebrate women being just as cool kings as men.
Next turn full admin+infrastructure, after next - festivals. Possibly double main, but we'll see.
I think most of our heroes only last one turn, or at least aren't guaranteed a second turn, since we only elect kings from experienced (and old) province chiefs or Artisan/Farming/Etc Chiefs. Thats why our diplo hero from way back when had "lasts at least 2 turns" as a major bonus, cause he was really young for a king...or was he before we made the jump to provincial kingdom and we still just had High Chief?. @Academia Nut how old is Magwyna, and/or what sort of odds would we have on her lasting two+ turns?
 
There is some potential for backfire via the "exception that proves the rule" effect, but yes, having a female reign over a golden age would help considerably at putting the idea of "female rulers = good" into people's minds. Whether or not that means all women is a bit murkier.

Okay, so festivals after 'golden age' is a good combo to at least alleviate risks of patriarchy, noted. Like, there is always risk of failure, but this is probably the best opportunity we'll have, so...
I mean, it still requires us to hit a golden age somehow.

We're totally in one piece, that's what Stability 2+ means. Our action down there was heavily increased by the +3/turn that Baby Boom was giving us. Without that, we've lost a significant portion of our action equivalents. These past turns have also been boosted by Symphony since we were triple and quadruple maining the same action. We're going to switch back to a much more reasonable action per turn count now.

In the update, our northern chiefs are making a 'faction' with the Stallions chief against our Southern chiefs. It is a warning sign.
We are not breaking apart yet, but when we will be breaking apart it will either be too late or, if we are lucky, if will be merely much more painful to deal with than now.
 
@Academia Nut, if we pick Maggie, does her heroic admin proc for the other mid-turn orderings (I.E. do we use her roll to decide which stability-affecting actions go first)?
 
Back
Top