- Location
- Rockford, USA
- Pronouns
- They/Them
Non-Masqued. I'll say Super Saiyan if that's what's going on, there'll be no doubt.By saiyan form, do you mean regular non-masqued saiyan or super saiyan?
Non-Masqued. I'll say Super Saiyan if that's what's going on, there'll be no doubt.By saiyan form, do you mean regular non-masqued saiyan or super saiyan?
Thanks. By the way, what's House Senzu currently guilty of and liable to be punished for according to Saiyan lore? It's sort of a passive rebellion and Raditz tried to power up that one time, but does Kakara know from her training what Berra is expected to do when he finds them?Non-Masqued. I'll say Super Saiyan if that's what's going on, there'll be no doubt.
The House of Senzu could be solidly tried for defying the will of their Lord by way of defying his accepted Regent. They could defend themselves if they successfully made a case for Dandeer having gained her position illegally, or in some way managed to show legal precedent for their actions.Thanks. By the way, what's House Senzu currently guilty of and liable to be punished for according to Saiyan lore? It's sort of a passive rebellion and Raditz tried to power up that one time, but does Kakara know from her training what Berra is expected to do when he finds them?
The House of Senzu could be solidly tried for defying the will of their Lord by way of defying his accepted Regent. They could defend themselves if they successfully made a case for Dandeer having gained her position illegally, or in some way managed to show legal precedent for their actions.
Raditz's actions are a shakier case to press; while he certainly came right up to the edge of transforming, it's acknowledged that there's an involuntary aspect to your first no matter who you are -- one reason why Scions are explicitly not held responsible for whatever they do during their first transformation outside of very specific circumstances. The case would probably come down to a mind delve to determine whether or not Raditz's near-transformation was premeditated. If it was not, he would be released given that he didn't actually transform. If it was, then he would be found guilty of attempting it and it would come down to a matter of sentencing, which really depends on how Lady Vegeta is feeling that day given the wide range of precedents.
And, of course, if the members of House Senzu have been actively pursuing a Super Saiyan revolt, all adults would be easily found guilty, all children would be at serious risk of being found guilty, all adults would be executed, and the children would either be scattered among the Clan with new surnames or executed outright (although Yammar is the only precedent of child executions, it must be noted).
Well, if we manage to knock Dandeer off her throne, would "desperately attempting to stop an unlawful seizing of power and fight-off a Super Saiyan helping such an attempt" be considered mitigating circumstances under most circumstances? Has such a thing ever come up? *looks at Lord Oni*If it was, then he would be found guilty of attempting it and it would come down to a matter of sentencing, which really depends on how Lady Vegeta is feeling that day given the wide range of precedents.
Thanks, that makes a lot of sense. If we unsealed Jaffur would Dandeer remain regent, or would Jaffur be made lord right then? It seems pretty easy to argue that Dandeer's sealing of double Vegeta to obtain her position is unlawful, but if the judge is Berra or Dandeer herself... or, given their persoanl involvement, would they call in the Patriarch?
Raditz's shakier case is arguably harder to deal with then; I suppose one of the things we should be asking him (along with if he ever tried again) is if he meant to do so.
Well, if we manage to knock Dandeer off her throne, would "desperately attempting to stop an unlawful seizing of power and fight-off a Super Saiyan helping such an attempt" be considered mitigating circumstances under most circumstances? Has such a thing ever come up? *looks at Lord Oni*
If you're willing to sacrifice your reputation and legal standing in the doing
yes.
At the risk of sounding stupid, I need a reminder
The reason why it's illegal for anyone but the scion and lord/lady of the two great clans to ascend to super saiyan status is because that would cause a lot of issues and make the masquerade much harder yes? That was all to it right?
Yeah, pretty much. The Enemy is apparently sufficiently Bad News that the minor risk of Gerenhuld's population finding us and then subsequently being observed by outside forces was too great. It's the same reason no one can go SS2 at all, though it also doubles as a handy way of keeping the rest of the population under control if you're the only one who's allowed to be that strong.
*raises eyebrow* You had just said that it comes down to sentencing, with a wide-range of precedents. I was asking if such a thing would be considered/has ever come up in such a trial.If you're willing to sacrifice your reputation and legal standing in the doing
yes.
Funnily enough, the vision makes that really very unlikely. And whilst it's possible for a bunch of regular saiyans to beat a super saiyan in a fight, they straight up aren't going to take us down before we can escape.
This isn't their plan anyway; they were surprised to see us, and are currently trying to get a handle on the situation. They're pleasantly surprised we aren't here to beat them up and yell for Dad, but judging by the reactions of literally everyone we've met they're under no illusions about what's going to happen if we - or they - start a fight.
By saiyan form, do you mean regular non-masqued saiyan or super saiyan?
At the risk of sounding stupid, I need a reminder
The reason why it's illegal for anyone but the scion and lord/lady of the two great clans to ascend to super saiyan status is because that would cause a lot of issues and make the masquerade much harder yes? That was all to it right?
Right...I wonder how they deal with (if it's ever happened) if someone accidently goes SS, I mean grief is the key emotional trigger and a need of course. What would be the course of action...punishing them for something that's (kinda) out of your control?
What would be the protocol?
*raises eyebrow* You had just said that it comes down to sentencing, with a wide-range of precedents. I was asking if such a thing would be considered/has ever come up in such a trial.
So where did your comment come from?
Oh, no. I mean that if we/the Senzu made a successful case that Dandeers actions/Regency was illegal in nature, could that and the fact that she was receiving support from Berra in her actions/Regency be considered mitigating factors, especially historically?Your comment looked like you were asking, "So if we do this 'overthrow Dandeer' thing in a way that's blatantly illegal, would that be enough reason to forgive the Senzus making Super Saiyans?" Your response makes me think that that isn't what you're getting at, but that's what I read.
Forbid them from training base strength past ten million (as a safety margin), forbid them from ever transforming again, and -- circumstances depending -- discreetly look into the necessity or possibility of giving them the fabled Third Lordship to avoid that thorny issue.
Oh, no. I mean that if we/the Senzu made a successful case that Dandeers actions/Regency was illegal in nature, could that and the fact that she was receiving support from Berra in her actions/Regency be considered mitigating factors, especially historically?
Since legally, it would have been in opposition of coup and an enemy Super Saiyan, (arguably) in defense of the Clans Scion.
We were explicitly and repeatedly told that the vision was a potentiality, not a certainty, and that we shouldn't put a lot of weight on it.
Their reactions have largely been to the idea of having been discovered. While they probably don't relish the idea of a throw-down, they have lured the threat into their controlled, fortified, masqued domain surrounded by their people and are currently interrogating her. As far as ways to handle the situation which don't involve the immediate nuclear option, that's pretty much to be expected. Let's hope she's smart enough to see that as well and stay on edge while refusing to eat or drink anything they give her.
Either way, opening with an intention to break the seal is probably not the best approach. Frankly, assuming she doesn't tell them to call her and flee, there's no reason why Kakara shouldn't be the one demanding answers. By all rights she should be holding most of the cards here.
Again, there almost certainly a reason that they disappeared along with multiple irreplaceable strategic resources instead of just playing coy, and the leading possibility is preparation for a surprise usurpation of the incapacitated royal line.
-which I'm not even sure is something we shouldn't enthusiastically support, but does depend on the seal remaining intact at least long enough to settle and officialize everything.
It's because, "Shut up before I feed you your own feet, pleb."
Less cynically, Saiyans like to fight. A lot. Balkanized chaos tends to be counterproductive. Having a small number of absolutely incontestable authorities at the top to keep everybody else behaving themselves prevents that.
It's not relevant to anything here, but your signature should be Heroes, not Hero's. I wouldn't bother mentioning it (because correcting spelling on a forum if it's not a piece of literature comes across as being a jerk), except since it's in your signature it's going to come up again and again.
Intrigue is how you scheme in general, both offensively and defensively. So yes, that's how you confirm plots. You the players -- and by extension Kakara the character -- can suspect people all you like, and even make contingencies, but finding something concrete is an Intrigue check. Executing those contingencies is a check as well. Any time you intersect somebody's scheme prompts a hidden Intrigue check -- but be aware that if I say nothing about any checks, you can assume that my answer to, "anything suspicious?" is, "you find nothing," not, "there's nothing there to be found."@PoptartProdigy, is there anything in the mechanics regarding detecting other peoples' intrigue? Does the intrigue skill have any effect on how likely we are to pick up another person's plots and/or lies, explicitly or just how the character comes across in the text? Or is that all on the players, and the skill's just for getting away with our own schemes?
Intrigue is how you scheme in general, both offensively and defensively. So yes, that's how you confirm plots. You the players -- and by extension Kakara the character -- can suspect people all you like, and even make contingencies, but finding something concrete is an Intrigue check. Executing those contingencies is a check as well. Any time you intersect somebody's scheme prompts a hidden Intrigue check -- but be aware that if I say nothing about any checks, you can assume that my answer to, "anything suspicious?" is, "you find nothing," not, "there's nothing there to be found."
All that being said, in this case you're checking against Deceit. I might combine the two at some point given how fine the distinction can be (it's why all forms of not-mendacious communication, as well as perception of the same, are lumped under, "Communication"), but for now Deceit refers to direct, person-to-person lying and the discernment of such, and Intrigue refers to the act of executing or countering a plot. Obviously, Deceit is involved in any act of Intrigue except the most hands-off of schemes, but for now I'm seeing them as meaningfully different enough to warrant separate skills.
Once again, bear in mind that successful checks on either of those skills denote you finding something more concrete than suspicion. You and Kakara both have working minds and can suspect all day long. But without a successful check, you don't know.
And before somebody asks: if you want to roll a Deceit check against Raditz at this point, the answer is, "you find nothing."
I shall always roll one secretly, when applicable, and the text will narrate the results.And with defensive deceit/intrigue checks confirmed, my leanings towards focusing on them next training plan just rocketed up to "we need this right now - no, we need this yesterday." Thanks for clarifying!
Is there any point to asking to roll a deceit check, or will you always secretly roll one when applicable?
And before somebody asks: if you want to roll a Deceit check against Raditz at this point, the answer is, "you find nothing."
Raditz leads you down a side passage to an office and sits down with you in front of a fireplace in opposed chairs. "So," he says. "It's been quite some time. We'd begun to worry that perhaps your father had managed to convince you that he was in the right, but here you are. And here I am, not arrested for treason." He leans back. "So tell me...what brings you here, Scion?"
That is an excellent idea, though it seems unlikely they'll leave us alone with him. Maybe we can play on our oddball disposition to not-insisting-but-not-really-taking-no-for-an-answer have a chat with him?