- Location
- La La Land
Sure, post a link or something.There's a discord server. A lot of people here are on it. Join us, won't you?
Sure, post a link or something.There's a discord server. A lot of people here are on it. Join us, won't you?
Join the Villains Victorious Chat Discord Server! Wish granted. Welcome aboard, friend.
Oh no. I'm not taunting you. It just seems to me that you potentially stand to lose a great deal more by being greedy, and ignoring the risks in favor of a reward you are not guaranteed to get-- because, for all we know, GalFed could just shoot the lab down mid-flight-- rather defeats the purpose of assessing them at all. Like, I get it's a Quest, and this is guaranteed to be fun either way, I'm sure, but I don't know if mad looting sprees should form the basis of a jailbreak. Still, good to know where I stand with you.
aaaaand I'm in! Thanks!Join the Villains Victorious Chat Discord Server! Wish granted. Welcome aboard, friend.
if we turn down the chance to steal an entire lab while cackling madly can we really call ourselves a villain!?Ported over from the DoofQuest Chat:
I know. I'm tempted to say something about how there's not a whole lot of risk assessment going on while everyone is salivating over the thought of having a whole alien lab under Doof's control. Never mind that it's full of people that you're going to have to subdue somehow before you get to Doofania, or that any one of them could easily just radio in your coordinates once you get there and have GalFed at your doorstep in mere minutes.
Nah, bruh, gotta risk it for the bisq-uh, lab.
Oh yes, I'm very tempted. I have absolutely no faith this will work out, and I can be a very vocal pessimist. But I won't do that, because I'm curious as to how it will play out. If it succeeds, great. We'll get Jumba, and his lab. If it fails, we may lose Khan, Russ, Jumba, and Monogram, on top of making enemies out of GalFed-- if they find out who they're working for.
All I'm saying is that I hope it's worth it. Best of luck, Loot Goblins!
You COULD lose a great deal, but the things you describe are more "fail almost every check" levels of failure or "nat. 1 with an enemy nat. 100" levels of failure. Statistically it is far more likely that any fail state would damage us but be nowhere near the levels of harm you are proposing. I CAN in fact do risk assessments. I said as much when I said I wasn't willing to take the "fun" option with Sinatron back in Vegas. This isn't really as bad as you propose. What you are proposing is a possibility, but not a likely one.Oh no. I'm not taunting you. It just seems to me that you potentially stand to lose a great deal more by being greedy, and ignoring the risks in favor of a reward you are not guaranteed to get-- because, for all we know, GalFed could just shoot the lab down mid-flight-- rather defeats the purpose of assessing them at all. Like, I get it's a Quest, and this is guaranteed to be fun either way, I'm sure, but I don't know if mad looting sprees should form the basis of a jailbreak. Still, good to know where I stand with you.
You COULD lose a great deal, but the things you describe are more "fail almost every check" levels of failure or "nat. 1 with an enemy nat. 100" levels of failure. Statistically it is far more likely that any fail state would damage us but be nowhere near the levels of harm you are proposing. I CAN in fact do risk assessments. I said as much when I said I wasn't willing to take the "fun" option with Sinatron back in Vegas. This isn't really as bad as you propose. What you are proposing is a possibility, but not a likely one.
Also raises the question if Gantu is actually on the Hawaiian Islands and not back in space.don't forget that the only person that could actually stop Khan is maybe Gantu.
so I kind of like our odds right now
I mean, this is ignoring several thingsPorted over from the DoofQuest Chat:
I know. I'm tempted to say something about how there's not a whole lot of risk assessment going on while everyone is salivating over the thought of having a whole alien lab under Doof's control. Never mind that it's full of people that you're going to have to subdue somehow before you get to Doofania, or that any one of them could easily just radio in your coordinates once you get there and have GalFed at your doorstep in mere minutes.
Nah, bruh, gotta risk it for the bisq-uh, lab.
Oh yes, I'm very tempted. I have absolutely no faith this will work out, and I can be a very vocal pessimist. But I won't do that, because I'm curious as to how it will play out. If it succeeds, great. We'll get Jumba, and his lab. If it fails, we may lose Khan, Russ, Jumba, and Monogram, on top of making enemies out of GalFed-- if they find out who they're working for.
All I'm saying is that I hope it's worth it. Best of luck, Loot Goblins!
I figure the risks are less of a straightforward mano a mano Martial sort and more that we may draw the ire of an interstellar power. Like ticking off Uncle Sam, except, y'know, way worse.don't forget that the only person that could actually stop Khan is maybe Gantu.
so I kind of like our odds right now
You COULD lose a great deal, but the things you describe are more "fail almost every check" levels of failure or "nat. 1 with an enemy nat. 100" levels of failure. Statistically it is far more likely that any fail state would damage us but be nowhere near the levels of harm you are proposing. I CAN in fact do risk assessments. I said as much when I said I wasn't willing to take the "fun" option with Sinatron back in Vegas. This isn't really as bad as you propose. What you are proposing is a possibility, but not a likely one.
if we turn down the chance to steal an entire lab while cackling madly can we really call ourselves a villain!?
have some Evil Pride!
We could do that. It'd probably help rehabilitate the Toon image, even as the public becomes more anti-Toon. I still want to turn Doofania into the new center for the Toon Film Industry (and found Acme Looniversity to aid that industry) though. I don't know how we would activate such an option - if it ever became one - but it is still a dream I aspire to.So recently, our discord chat has mentioned putting toons on video sites like buzztube or our own if we choose to do so. Your thoughts?
It really depends on what the state of the galaxy at large is, if it's DVV Space, which in my opinion it most likely is, then GalFed is in no position to devote any of its attention to a minor issue on a backwater world who's only use is as a wildlife preserveI figure the risks are less of a straightforward mano a mano Martial sort and more that we may draw the ire of an interstellar power. Like ticking off Uncle Sam, except, y'know, way worse.
But, y'know, risk and reward.
Slight problem. There's nationwide prejudice against toons. Only the most popular and hardworking of toons would be able to scrape together enough ad revenue for a living, and most of them already have a place in the film industry.An idea we were thinking was making a social media, a video sharing site.
ToonTubers. (Either this would be the site, or this would be a program/aspect of the site that is based on providing a video-sharing platform for Toons)
A place for Toons to let out their desire to perform in a safer manner, so they don't resort to crime. We can also make sure they get a fair wage based on their ad revenue/clicks, so they don't get motivated to do crime because of a lack of money. Plus, they would be able to create and manage their own content that can stand on its own rather than needing to take orders from others. Plus it would have a much cheaper and easier start up cost compared to a traditional cartoon.
Plus, if we have viral content that is pro-toon (because toons are being entertaining) that could help improve the public perception of Toons across the US/World.
Firstly, just because Toons are making the content, doesn't mean they are the only ones watching. See: Cartoons.Eh, I'd be leery of creating or marketing a social media site just for a single demographic. Might limit the userbase a bit.
Well yeah, but cartoons were to television what the "toontuber" concept should be to the hypothetical social media platform: part of the larger whole. But more broadly: Do we want the social media to be not!YouTube?Firstly, just because Toons are making the content, doesn't mean they are the only ones watching. See: Cartoons.
Secondly, we could make a general video sharing site and ToonTubers could just be a program that is part of the site to help encourage Toon creators.
Well, I did have the idea of just mashing a buncha social media sites together. I like the idea bout ToonTube just being a program rather than it's own thing by the way. Seems much more reasonable.Well yeah, but cartoons were to television what the "toontuber" concept should be to the hypothetical social media platform: part of the larger whole. But more broadly: Do we want the social media to be not!YouTube?
An idea we were thinking was making a social media, a video sharing site.
ToonTubers. (Either this would be the site, or this would be a program/aspect of the site that is based on providing a video-sharing platform for Toons)
A place for Toons to let out their desire to perform in a safer manner, so they don't resort to crime. We can also make sure they get a fair wage based on their ad revenue/clicks, so they don't get motivated to do crime because of a lack of money. Plus, they would be able to create and manage their own content that can stand on its own rather than needing to take orders from others. Plus it would have a much cheaper and easier start up cost compared to a traditional cartoon.
Plus, if we have viral content that is pro-toon (because toons are being entertaining) that could help improve the public perception of Toons across the US/World.
We could use the "It won't stop flushing" video as the homepage example.
I don't think Doofenshmirtz would do that, especially if it's just to humiliate him further.We could use the "It won't stop flushing" video as the homepage example.