You scoff. "Oh, right, like the great David Xanatos has ever failed at hiding something."
"See the end of the world right in front of your eyes, and you might think differently." Xanatos replies.
Honestly, makes sense to me. If we go for the lessons then we're still a piece. Not a Pawn, we're getting promoted, but...We're still just a piece on his board. The other option is more "we don't want to be your game piece at all". It's time to be another player, not a game piece of Xanay's board. I want to be allies with Xanay, but I want to be a partner, not a sidekick.Honestly, I am likely to vote against just because to me there's a strong feeling of giving up to accepting that we cannot possibly beat Xanatos, so we might as well try to get a consolation prize out of it.
It feels like if we accept we this, we resign outselves to the fact that Doof can never win this game, that we as players can't win it, so we should aim to only lose against Xanatos. Toffee might win, Bill might win, or Xanatos might win. Doof will always be the runner-up at best.
And that's not a feeling I like, or that feels very in-character for Doof. It's not the most rational argument, but it's what swayed my decision.
Honestly, I am likely to vote against just because to me there's a strong feeling of giving up to accepting that we cannot possibly beat Xanatos, so we might as well try to get a consolation prize out of it.
It feels like if we accept we this, we resign outselves to the fact that Doof can never win this game, that we as players can't win it, so we should aim to only lose against Xanatos. Toffee might win, Bill might win, or Xanatos might win. Doof will always be the runner-up at best.
And that's not a feeling I like, or that feels very in-character for Doof. It's not the most rational argument, but it's what swayed my decision.
It is very rare to see Xanatos written well. He is a character who is explicitly supposed to be smarter than the author. Not merely more intelligent, but smarter. He sees angles that others don't.
What do you mean? We are absolutely going to do it. We're going to do all the stat buff ones eventually. They provide a permanent buff to every action in their category. That's hugely beneficial.There are only so many actions in a turn and making an action we aren't going to take better is no meaningful benefit.
As a factor of some potential influence in the vote, remember that Xanatos has a pin that looks like this:
This is entirely an argument from OOC paranoia, but we have to consider the benefits of 2 guaranteed Intrigue vs the chance of Bill playing peekaboo from David's lapel at some point.
I'll admit, I think you're being a bit fooled, though I agree with your conclusion. Xanatos isn't lying to Doof because he doesn't need to lie- indeed, lying to Doof would be actively counterproductive. By telling the truth, he's able to build trust and avoid building on a potentially unstable foundation.*He explicitly tells us that fact himself*, so in a weird way he´s being *more honest* to us than most people offering that kinda deal.
He effectively tells us "look, I can help you out a lot in keeping your secrets safer from OTHERS, but I PERSONALLY will be able read you like an open book in the process and you have to expect me to exploit that for myself at any given time - *are you okay with that?*"
The very fact that David "I only look for my own benefit and that of my family" Xanatos is that open about his own inherent scumminess and actually *seeks our consent* in "formalizing" things into an arrangement that at least *approaches* the label "symbiotic" (while of course still slanted in his favor) shows me that he prefers having us as a(n admittedly secondary) partner over having us as a rival.
I think it's important to remember that even though Xanatos never counted us as a friend, his act of pretending like he never knew Doof was considering him as a friend was just that- an act. He almost certainly did know, and was taking advantage of it. Now, he's taking advantage of Doof's new realization to cement himself as a reasonable man and potential ally in Doof's estimation.
This isn't to say we shouldn't take him up on it, we probably should. But we shouldn't let ourselves think he views us even as an ally, yet.
Now, obviously choosing to promote a pawn is an important decision, and you have to consider all the pieces on the board...Tick, tick, tick.
Black to move.
How many seconds on the clock?
===
[ ] Take Xanatos' Promotion
Your "Ask Mirage to let you practice lying" Personal Action changes to 'Ask Xanatos to let you practice lying'. Reward changes from gaining 1d4+1 intrigue to 1d4+3 intrigue.
Xanatos will teach you Intrigue.
Xanatos will teach you Intrigue.
This is a good point though. And after the shenanigans with Wasabi I am not inclined to spend another quarter-year on a small stat boost. Question is though: Suppose we accept Xanatos's offer and then drag our feet on the personal, what happens then?On the vote. The reason I'm going to vote no is very simple: We don't have the spare personal action to make use of it. 'practice lying' is a (0/150) action. We would need at least 2 and likely 4+ personal actions dedicated towards it to see the benefit.
Though it would be useful if we knew how hard it would be for us to beat Xan's Intruige rolls and vice versa now, and if we get Mirage's +4/ Xan's +7.
Also, I am getting kinda annoyed at everyone scoffing at the very notion of David harbouring at least *some* yet-distant fondness and admiration for Doof - after all, we helped him contain the Sanderson Witches during the Auction *and* saved his friggin bacon during Twelfth Night - try as he might, he simply *Can´t* be not affected even the slightest bit by that without stopping to still be fundamentally human.
Sure, it´s only an *ember* of positive predisposition, but it´s not *nothing* either and can still grow into more all the same.