Khan is a non-entity in terms of how CEOs are "realistically" picked.
Do remember that stats are representations. The people in the world of Doofquest don't see stats.
CEO's are picked primarily based on "do they physically look competent" and "did they recently hold a similar title, and come with recommendations to the board"
we don't have a board. Thank goodness. Boards are terrible. As is the process of selecting CEOs. As are CEOs.
but if we're not making it a democracy (A co-op like Mondragon), it's probably going to be autocratic kingship (we have no board of oligarchs mucking around) and someone would be the actual Steward administrating the realm while the
royal line CEO does whatever they please.
Wil E is a reasonable successor from the perspective that he recently held a title of prestige. Unfortunately, he is a Toon and does not have "the look of competence" going for him.
Genghis Khan however, has the looks. The muscles. The historical resume (the fact it exists matters more than the content). The star power.
Like. CEO's are picked without regard to their capability, track record, and intelligence. They are there to be relative figure heads and some of the most successful (like Jack-n-the-Box's CEO) do relatively little in terms of executive action. Literally, sitting still and listening to others run the company is usually more successful than trying to muck about with it.
This is functionally a King listening to Advisors run the realm while they do other things (generally related to the loyalty of nobility or the morale of the masses. Steve Jobs did this) rather than actually try to govern. There are rare instances in which a King is also skillful enough to be a
boon getting directly involved in the governance aspect (Genghis was an example of this) but in general they just had to listen and acquiesce to competent and
loyal advisors.
Same as now