Note that against things that aren't spite quests, we can let the quest fail and have Division of Labor handle it.
So basically it incentivizes us not to piss off our ruling class.
Note that against things that aren't spite quests, we can let the quest fail and have Division of Labor handle it.
We're doing okay for stability. We may or may not lose vassals, but it is very unlikely we will lose actual territory because we've got a Genius martial hero and most of the military power doesn't actually sit with the patricians.Also, for those suggesting civil war, how do you plan to not explode? We are likely to lose the West, so we take a stab hit, or several there. We also risk losing our new Hat, so that'll be fun. All while we lose stability and legitimacy fighting a damned civil war.
At the very best, we crawl out of a civil war with tens of thousands dead, tons of repairs to our infrastructure necessary, and several colonies lost, likely forcing a reclamation CB on us, which could throw us into a war against the SY.
DL does significantly less damage, especially if we do it right with an excellent admin on hand.
Nope. We are at 2 Stability; we can't really use Restoration meaningfully.
We shouldn't be doing that ANYWAYS, or at least decrease their power before doing so, but we were content with not only pissing on their wants, but also increasing their power or at least LETTING it increaseSo basically it incentivizes us not to piss off our ruling class.
@PrimalShadow , what do you tyinkbof going Sea Control agenda and not manually building warships?
Yeah we shouldn't do shit like enforce a wage for social underclass when it cuts into their bottom line.So basically it incentivizes us not to piss off our ruling class.
We're doing okay for stability. We may or may not lose vassals, but it is very unlikely we will lose actual territory because we've got a Genius martial hero and most of the military power doesn't actually sit with the patricians.
And really, we fight one civil war now or we're playing Romance of the Three Kingdoms and fighting civil wars periodically all the time after this if we distribute land. That is basically what distribute land is about- who controls the territory. If governors can claim that land belongs to their family, not the king or the people as a whole, that is a major goddamn step toward civil war getting a lot easier becaue it is no longer sacriligeous.
Best way to deal improve faction relations is the balanced agenda, which allows them to pursue actions that fulfill their quests.I don't know, remember the factions have their own agendas and not so many actions right now until we give them infrastructure. I'd do Sea Control and still build the warships to be safe.
Literally every faction either supports DL, or is indifferent to it. The players are the only ones against it.This is pure unbridled speculation, our traits very much support dealing with malcontent rebels.
I thought about it, but I'm not sure I trust the factions to actually take the second Warship action, and honestly having them build roads or watchtowers or harbors seems pretty good to me.@PrimalShadow , what do you think of going Sea Control agenda and not manually building warships?
Nice fearmongeringAlso, for those suggesting civil war, how do you plan to not explode? We are likely to lose the West, so we take a stab hit, or several there. We also risk losing our new Cap, so that'll be fun. All while we lose stability and legitimacy fighting a damned civil war.
At the very best, we crawl out of a civil war with tens of thousands dead, tons of repairs to our infrastructure necessary, and several colonies lost, likely forcing a reclamation CB on us, which could throw us into a war against the SY.
DL does significantly less damage, especially if we do it right with an excellent admin on hand.
The Patricians...who actually started a civil war over it.Literally every faction either supports DL, or is indifferent to it. The players are the only ones against it.
So who exactly is going against Symphony? The Yeomen, Guilds, Traders and Patricians?
Or just us?
I mean, that is what happens when one of our values makes the ruling class unsupressable. *shrugs*.So basically it incentivizes us not to piss off our ruling class.
Once againLiterally every faction either supports DL, or is indifferent to it. The players are the only ones against it.
So who exactly is going against Symphony? The Yeomen, Guilds, Traders and Patricians?
Or just us?
I thought about it, but I'm not sure I trust the factions to actually take the second Warship action, and honestly having them build roads or watchtowers or harbors seems pretty good to me.
Let me put the question differently - if we set our factions to Sea Control, what do you imagine doing with the extra Secondary and Guild action?
Urban poor, priests, and yeomen will support the king, which means he'll win the war.If it was just the Particians, we could deal.
But thee are literally no factions that support avoiding DL.
Some that don't care, yes, but none that actually think it's a bad idea.
The players do not represent the administration, they represent the cultural zeitgeist.Literally every faction either supports DL, or is indifferent to it. The players are the only ones against it.
So who exactly is going against Symphony? The Yeomen, Guilds, Traders and Patricians?
Or just us?
If we have, it's a result of upgrading Arete. He's The Best, so he can't possibly be bad! He must just be really good at some special things that you mere mortals can barely comprehend! (Seriously, that trait must represent huge social pressure to present yourself in the best possible light.)So uh, are these just polite ways of saying that he sucks at Diplomacy and Administration? Have we reached the point where any sign of weakness in the ruling family is now unacceptable?
The thing is, the Patricians and Yeomen want private land, the Priests want it in certain circumstances, Guilds are generally for it, and nobody else cares. (source)
It isn't just Patricians vs the rest of our society; it is half of our society against basically just the players.
Nobody's asked the rural poor what they think about giving fancy-pants city dwellers rights over themLiterally every faction either supports DL, or is indifferent to it. The players are the only ones against it.
So who exactly is going against Symphony? The Yeomen, Guilds, Traders and Patricians?
Or just us?
Dude, civil wars will not do pleasant things to our traits. We've lost, DL is necessary.
Maybe, maybe it might have been possible in the best case scenario, with our allies busy but strong, no approaching threats, and 2 Genius Martials.
Maybe.
But it's madness to suggest civil war for something AN has stated will be a reoccurring problem for the next millennia. We will just have to bend all our power to making sure we do this right. With an excellent admin at the helm, we have a limited opportunity to make sure we start this right. Combine that with intrigue options and EJ, and we should be able to pull it off.
[X] [Secondary] No Distribute Land
[X] [Secondary] No Distribute Landx2
That doesn't answer my question at all?Pirates. I am pretty sure the traders will take up the quest. One of their desire is warship.
The king who, for reasons nobody IC can adequately explain, decides to not DL, despite literally everyone thinking it's either a good idea, or don't care?The Patricians...who actually started a civil war over it.
We did not do what they wanted, they attacked.
Who exactly is in the wrong here
how is that fearmongering? The west has nearly been taken by the SY just a turn ago, civil wars are destructive and chaotic by nature, and war has never been an inherently good thing for our traits.Nice fearmongering
We have Division of Powers to specifically stop this from happening. They cannot just take control of the infrastructure or people that other polities control