We are left with using the poor, for whom we already have control mechanisms in place for, as the main body of our army. While the Grain Dole lasts, they won't become a new problem, allowing us to focus on all the OTHER problems.
Remember Gilded age was brought on by max wealth and not having other criteria for a golden age, so spend wealth or ensure we reach golden age criteria.
I have class in a minute. But IIRC the Marian reforms were needed because the Roman concept of citizen soldier was failing to provide Rome with the soldiers it needed. As in, citizens had to fight further abroad, not being able to work the farms, which were bought up by the rich, leading to a decrease in recruits and a crisis in the army.Uhhh... "Myranyn"...? Sounds like Marian as in Marian Reforms, which eventually shafted Rome. Kinda makes me not want it on principle.
Both is basically suicidal at current status so thats a no.
This is true but irrelevant, as only 1-10% of farmers are Yeomen(depending on land cultivation efficiency, the better the more the excess flows to the cities so each yeoman is in charge of less people but the same land), you will get similar troop quantity out of the urban poor as the rural middle class, as you can conscript a third of your urban poor without doing lasting harm to your economy, whereas doing the same to your farmer class would make things fold pretty quickly.The thing is that the development of steel occurred sometime in the classic era and while it certainly increased the potential productive power of a single person a ration of 1 non farmer to 10 farmers would persist through out the world well into the Renaissance.
The Roman situation is exactly why this works. They implemented three things which are individually beneficial, but combined into a terrible outcome:The other issue is that while Yeomen going of and doing their own thing is certainly a problem arming the poor and paying them to fight will also cause significant problems. You just need to look at the roman republic/empire to see an example of this going both very wrong and very right. On one hand you now have a significant and fairly replaceable number of potential pretty good troops who are dependent on the one paying them. However because these people have very little personal stake in the country as a whole (as opposed to land owners) and are dependent on that pay (also as apposed to land owners) you have a situation where you basically have a bunch of people who will be loyal to who ever is currently responsible for them getting paid or getting plunder. This usually works out as being their general or the patrician backing him. Look at the chaos of the roman civil wars for an indication of where that can lead.
Because we run into the problem we were facing when the crisis started: No more land to settle -> Lets go stab those guys next door for their land -> Oh look we're too far from the King to be controlled.Dependency of army on whoever is paying them is one of bigger factors in fall of Rome, for example, so this may well be a poisoned medicine.
PS as a value...wait, why wouldn't PS be a solution of its own? @veekie ? New settlements for spare sons is narratively a solution.
This is a large motivation for me too. While Harmysyn would be valuable and have its own benefits, I cannot imagine how it would be anywhere as effective as Myranyn for actually addressing the crisis. I'm more than happy to stamp out sparks that flare up from it down the line if it means my house stops burning down now.I also thinking about it, want Second Son over and done with, or at least mitigated.
We quite simply would not be able to manage two at once while also dealing with all the other problems.Challenge Started!
You have 3 turns to complete the following:
[Main] Study Metal, [Main] Study Tailings, [Main] Study Health + Metal or Tailings, [Main] Build Mine
There's that and what I was getting at in my post you quoted: We are not Rome.This is a large motivation for me too. While Harmysyn would be valuable and have its own benefits, I cannot imagine how it would be anywhere as effective as Myranyn for actually addressing the crisis. I'm more than happy to stamp out sparks that flare up from it down the line if it means my house stops burning down now.
I'd be super happy if that won, which it looks like it will, but that's tempered by the fact that we would essentially have to solve Second Son on our own which is painful as hell.
I have been unsold on the Khem value. Striking from vote nowI do not want to start a religious schism right now, and that's likely what stealing a semi-incompatible religious value from the Khemetri would do. I especially don't want their God-Kings trait which lets RA act as Stability, because while that's awesome mechanically it is the complete and utter antithesis of what we've built our entire scientific and governmental structure- that we need to think about these things and investigate.
Uh, they won't be able to grab stuff once we finish the reforms. What with no longer being armed and trained at state expense.I can't see the Myranyn Reforms solving the Second sons crisis. It'll eventually prevent it from occuring, but in the short term it'll make it worse. After all, by removing the Yeomen from the military we cut of further pathways for them to gain land and glory.
They'll be forced to go West if they want to grab stuff.
Basically as predicted we ate 2 Martial damage.That's scary.
>Martial -2 (+1), Naval +1
We do war badly, pirates have heroic leader and the Trelli died. Naval boost seems to be fixing of an error from last turn.
Uh, they won't be able to grab stuff once we finish the reforms. What with no longer being armed and trained at state expense.
Thats the whole point of the reforms.
Yeomen are armed by the state. Their weapons are legally borrowed from the state, but they can spend their own money to improve or replace lost gear, provided the state gets the same gear back or better.I thought the Yeomen where a sort of self-organised militia. We don't really have state training programs, after all.
I mean, yeah, that's why I was going for Chariots (+4 Martial) instead of Blackbirds (+2 Martial). Here's hoping those bonus effects were worth it considering they weren't even mentioned in the entire update.Basically as predicted we ate 2 Martial damage.
But we didn't know the cities would cover for it.
Go nuts on new settlements?I mean, yeah, that's why I was going for Chariots (+4 Martial) instead of Blackbirds (+2 Martial). Here's hoping those bonus effects were worth it considering they weren't even mentioned in the entire update.
But I'm still wondering WTF happened to our LTE. This is basically a crisis, we're at 14 LTE. That's so far below our econ cap (24) that even without the Ironworks econ drain we're gonna be on the edge of Starvation all the time.
Efficient yes, but narratively not quite coherentI mean, yeah, that's why I was going for Chariots (+4 Martial) instead of Blackbirds (+2 Martial). Here's hoping those bonus effects were worth it considering they weren't even mentioned in the entire update.
I can't see the Myranyn Reforms solving the Second sons crisis. It'll eventually prevent it from occuring, but in the short term it'll make it worse. After all, by removing the Yeomen from the military we cut of further pathways for them to gain land and glory.
"We need to reconcentrate the military power of the patrician class, and if all the best warrior sons are going to run off, I see no reason not to train our daughters! The demands of command are not so vigorous as those of the common footsoldier, and there are many an account-"
"Gods and heroes do not count!" Myranyn shouted.
"MANY AN ACCOUNT! - many an account of women commanders of great skill. More than that, if all the most vital young men from the rural middle classes keep disappearing then I greatly fear for the vigour of the patrician blood! If all we have to marry our daughters to are merchants and artisans then in a short time all martial valour will be bred out of us. More than that, we can bring wayward sons back to us by offering the temptation of potent wives who will bear far stronger sons than any barbarian peasant woman in a felt tent!" Harmysyn countered after shouting his say back into place.
"It's still complicated, but the new iron coming out of Redhills is cheaper than ever, so we can make lots of them in a hurry," Myranyn explained to the skeptical patricians of Redshore, showing off the latest design of crossbow, this one replacing the old slider mechanism with smaller and sturdier trigger system. "Combined with the new armour designs the cheaper iron has spurred on, and we can raise up tens of thousands of warriors just as good at ranged combat as the yeomen, only they can come from the urban poor instead. I know you've experience with the gymnasia and the methods for a single instruct to teach a dozen youths athleticism and basic combat, and the techniques are definitely scalable to much larger groups."
"Yes, but then the poor would be the problem, would they not?" Harmysyn, a fellow would-be reformer, pointed out.
"To a degree, but especially with the bread dole now in place we can better keep them dependent upon the nobility and the crown than we can with the yeomanry, who have farms and, assuming they don't do something stupid, can just use the productivity of their farms to keep themselves alive if they decide to defy the crown. With the city dwellers, if they defy us, we just cut off the supply of grain and wait until their bellies bring them crawling back to us.
Certainly that'll help, but we won't be in charge of that anyway. We're gonna be busy just treading water getting our Stability back up. Provinces will be the ones managing everything for a couple turns. We're gonna have to Enforce Justice a ton and not spend any LTE on our Guild actions.Go nuts on new settlements?
Efficient yes, but narratively not quite coherent