Obviously voluntary trade is nearly always beneficial - problems arise when your dependency on it becomes a vulnerability.
Considering in how many trading goods we're leading or dominant, I do think we would feel it if trade were interrupted. And not just in stat-wise wealth; I'm sure the loss of that income would have narrative knock-on effects. There would certainly be stab loss and social unrest. Still, yes, we're not the Trelli.
However, while being able to survive a trade disruption is obviously a good thing, I am a bit concerned with general anti-trade/anti-commerce attitudes in this thread. While of course the volume of trade in that era would only be a fraction of a fraction of... what it is today, the general principle of comparative advantages still hold. That's a general economical principle that always holds, which is a reason why trade is always economically beneficial.
Maybe, but we have a limited number of provinces before penalties. Probably better ROI from integrating the Txolla. Or Gulvalley.You know now is a good time to Integrate Western Wall. It got as many actions as us so it's big. with the Admin genius and the low Martial it should go well.
You know now is a good time to Integrate Western Wall. It got as many actions as us so it's big. with the Admin genius and the low Martial it should go well.
the lowlands probably rely overly much on flooding and shallow channels for irrigation, and thus are heavily impacted when the water level drops. Our norias and maybe if we make multiple shallow (probably earthen) dams would help w/ that.Though, even with a super drought, our irrigation systems should continue to work along the rivers, where most our stuff is going to be anyway. Worst case, we need more Norias to pump the water upwards.
Ehhhhh, I think the Roman Empire suffered pretty hard for the trade it engaged in with China, as it sucked a huge amount of their silver out of the economy.
OK; I must call bullshit on that. Patricians are still rich like *quack*!To add a bit on it.
The reason we should do it is because our current set up means that no one but the state has the wealth and influence to truly patron the art,
and our nobility has no wear near the wealth to afford it.
Well we know the txolla took an action called "Rework irrigation" so that's probably not an issue as much anymorethe lowlands probably rely overly much on flooding and shallow channels for irrigation, and thus are heavily impacted when the water level drops. Our norias and maybe if we make multiple shallow (probably earthen) dams would help w/ that.
Western Wall is so far one of the most loyal colonies. If you want to grab one, do Gulvalley so we get an open subordinate slot.
Even then I'd prefer to let Gulvalley to cook for a while. It can invest into building tall first.
The Txcolla are much more pressing given their sheer size. Take some of that away and the rump colony won't be able to rebell.
...British Empire I think you meant.Ehhhhh, I think the Roman Empire suffered pretty hard for the trade it engaged in with China, as it sucked a huge amount of their silver out of the economy.
or Trell...Maybe, but we have a limited number of provinces before penalties. Probably better ROI from integrating the Txolla. Or Gulvalley.
The Trell are to depended on us to cause major problems.
I'd rather we delay integration for a turn or two.
Somthing like this should be perfect for next turn.
Main : art Patronage
Secondary : great Hall annex
Secondary : garden annex
This will definitely create a trend or movement towards cultural development, as well as greatly boosting the cultural influence and impact of the Royal court.
The more people who visit the court the more we can ingraine it culture into them, and the more the arts spread and develop.
The synergy should also help us with our vassals and provincial elites, as more courtiers means they are too busy trying to impress and curry favour to plot or cause dissent in their territory.
Nope, the Roman Empire got fucked about by the loss of silver too! It's something that's been discussed in this thread before, in fact....British Empire I think you meant.
And yes, "always" is wrong. There is also the case that the principle of comparative advantages tells agricultural economies to stay agricultural, because hey, that's what they're best in. But in truth, you need industrialization in order to develop, and most industrialization in Europe was done, on the economical level, by heavy protectionism. Which in that case, as a "strategical" rather than a general use of protectionism, was okay. I did oversell that principle a bit maybe, but I wanted to get it across.
OK; I must call bullshit on that. Patricians are still rich like *quack*!
????!!!!Well we know the txolla took an action called "Rework irrigation" so that's probably not an issue as much anymore
The Trell are to depended on us to cause major problems.
The highlanders are still the next target unless if something else comes up.
evil but yeah. drug dealers got more power.But yes, the point is to make it so other nations become reliant on Ymar, not the reverse.![]()
How about garden and shrine annex? Proper myth support and royal graden would help the clerks relax. Not really keen on great hall.
Can't really avoid that becoming two-way. We can't (and shouldn't) just ignore all the wealth that pours in, we have to use it, so at some level we become dependent on it to maintain our usual activities.But yes, the point is to make it so other nations become reliant on Ymar, not the reverse.![]()
I can respect this.I just want the Trell's land so that we're closer to finishing the circle and can proceed to not give a shit about that area in any sense other than the defensive.
The Trelli would almost never willingly cut off trade with us. However, if they faced the same scenario as described by the videos, then they won't be able to continue significant trade with us.That said, I don't think the Trelli would ever disrupt trade with us. We dominate a majority of the import and export markets on this side of the Straight of Trell. They need our trade more than we need theirs.