Except neither of them do as you describe.No. It isn't.
We have word from AN that wildcat prospecting basically allows for us to put the initial development in the hands of individuals, in exchange for a substantial reward of the initial product. However, thereafter, the mine goes into ownership and management of the state.
Distribute land basically puts land management in the hands of individuals.
Wildcat Prospecting is such a great trait for us. I was initially worried that the individual ownership thing would be a problem, but this seems like the perfect mix of our ways while encouraging greater innovations and initiative.No. It isn't.
We have word from AN that wildcat prospecting basically allows for us to put the initial development in the hands of individuals, in exchange for a substantial reward of the initial product. However, thereafter, the mine goes into ownership and management of the state.
Distribute land basically puts land management in the hands of individuals.
If we finish a land management megaproject at Stability 3, is the bonus stability just wasted?
Except neither of them do as you describe.
The Mine and Land are assigned to individuals to develop and manage. We pay the managers a bonus for productivity and take the rest.
The Mine and Land remain under the ownership of the state, but under the administation of the heirs of the original managers and developers. It will remain so in both cases unless it is demonstrated that malpractice or mismanagement is in play, upon which the ownership can be revoked through Restore Order or Enforce Justice.
You could just confirm with @Academia Nut
Considering that the rain is hitting so hard that the very soil itself is becoming water saturated, such a collapse will happen within a 5-10 year span of a primarily packed earth Iron Age dam. We don't have concrete here.
So chances of an intervention is...low(for the matter, figuring out HOW to intervene in the soil getting water saturated is a mystery, short of just draining the dam dry)
That's in the early bronze age. Roman designs incorporated arches etc. and some are still standing to this day:This gravity dam featured an originally 9-metre-high (30 ft) and 1 m-wide (3.3 ft) stone wall, supported by a 50 m-wide (160 ft) earth rampart.
Yes, which means the soil the dam is resting on is losing it's strength as it transitions to a semi-liquid state.... Rain hitting 'hard'? Rain is ALWAYS at terminal velocity when it hits. The soil is becoming saturated because there's simply more rain annually than our drainage allows for.
... Rain hitting 'hard'? Rain is ALWAYS at terminal velocity when it hits.
Yes, which means the soil the dam is resting on is losing it's strength as it transitions to a semi-liquid state.
Note that the described level of rainfall is enough to cause MODERN dams some serious stress, that's with reinforced concrete and foundation pilings.
I still have no clue what he means. Not being excessively literal, literally baffled by his language. Ofc, YOU are right in an excessively literal and irrelevant way...Even within the confines of your excessive literalism, that terminal velocity depends on droplet size.
See my edit for clarification on dam design. I don't know what soil you think would lose it's strength. The soil behind the dam isn't providing strength (just weight), and the soil under the dam is a river bed and covered by a 30 ft. high wall and dirt pile.Yes, which means the soil the dam is resting on is losing it's strength as it transitions to a semi-liquid state.
Note that the described level of rainfall is enough to cause MODERN dams some serious stress, that's with reinforced concrete and foundation pilings.
The maarib dam (built by the himyarites approx 800 bce) required regular repairs to avoid breaches, and was vertically expanded often due to sit buildup in the sluiceway, and did in fact breach in 145 bceI suspect that if we had built the dam before the current climate crisis, we would be in a "save the dam" megaproject or forced to choose between the forest and the dam.
That's the packed earth, a significant portion of your structural support and counterweight relies on compacted soil behaving like...soil, not water. That means that instead of providing weight augmented frictional resistance to the wall moving under pressure, it flows, lubricated by the water saturation.Edit: Also, I don't know what you mean by a 'Packed Earth' dam. That's a type of wall, not of dam. The earliest dams were gravity dams; a rock wall with 100 feet of dirt piled behind it for weight. The very earliest we have info on was in Jordan and had:
True. All dams require regular repairs and sluice maintenance. Interesting that they chose to build it higher instead of dredging the sluice.The maarib dam (built by the himyarites approx 800 bce) required regular repairs to avoid breaches, and was vertically expanded often due to sit buildup in the sluiceway
Maybe we could have deep divers or somethingThe maarib dam (built by the himyarites approx 800 bce) required regular repairs to avoid breaches, and was vertically expanded often due to sit buildup in the sluiceway, and did in fact breach in 145 bce
Ah, I misread: it was expanded because of silt buildup in the canals it fed:True. All dams require regular repairs and sluice maintenance. Interesting that they chose to build it higher instead of dredging the sluice.
Also, note that they drained the dam to clear the sluicewayThe Ma'rib dam impounded floodwater to enable irrigation of downstream oases. Over several centuries, silts entrained in the irrigation water accumulated on the irrigated fields up to 15 m high. This caused loss of slope and conveyance, and the dam was raised to compensate. In addition to small operational openings for irrigation water withdrawals, large openings on the upstream side of the dam were probably used during construction to pass the water of the river, but may also have been used for periodical flushing of accumulated sediments. These examples show that the engineers of the time were keenly aware of reservoir siltation problems and were able to successfully extend the operational lifetime of the reservoirs by structural enhancements and probable sediment flushing
Oh hey, at some point after i stopped checking for updates yesterday, the action list got updated, and we officially have an option to expand into the lowlands, since i'm pretty sure "south of cataracts" is the "south of badlands" location for the dam...still don't really want to expand much while doing the megaproject, especially since it'd be into the lowlands which we aren't as used to working with, but we should have the megaproject done before the climate stops being unstable, and so long as thats the case the HK shouldn't be able to take this back...New Settlement - There are a few new sites that could have new settlements placed on them: northern Blackriver, far eastern Redhills, far north-eastern Redhills, south of cataracts
* S: +1 Econ next turn, increases number Econ Expansion depending on environment
* M: +1 Econ and +1 Mysticism end of turn, increases Econ Expansion
Special: Main new settlement in south of cataracts, far eastern Redhills, or far north-eastern Redhills can produce new provinces
Expand Forests - The People have knowledge of how to regrow and repair forests, which extends to bringing them to places they have never been, with considerable effort. With charcoal now in higher demand, can also provide a sustainable supply (5/5 currently locked up)
* S: -1 Econ, -1 Econ Expansion, grows forest, +1 Econ next turn if in settled territory and controlled
* M: -1 Econ, -1 Econ Expansion, grows forest, +2 Econ next turn if in settled and controlled territory
Expand Forests - The People have knowledge of how to regrow and repair forests, which extends to bringing them to places they have never been, with considerable effort. With charcoal now in higher demand, can also provide a sustainable supply (5/5 currently locked up)
* S: -1 Econ, -1 Econ Expansion, grows forest, +1 Econ next turn if in settled territory and controlled
* M: -1 Econ, -1 Econ Expansion, grows forest, +2 Econ next turn if in settled and controlled territory
rovinces – [Main] Expand Econ, [Sec] Study Stars, [Sec] Survey, [Sec] Expand Forest
[X][Hat] Propagate March (-6 Diplo, +4 Econ, +2 Econ Expansion, +2 Art, +2 Mysticism, -1 Centralization, new territory gained)
[X][WC] Begin limited construction (-3 Econ, -1 Wealth, -1 Econ Expansion, -1 Centralization; +4 Econ, +2 Martial end of next turn)
[X][WC] Full development (-3 Econ, -1 Econ Expansion, -3 Wealth, -2 Centralization, +5 Art, +5 Mysticism, new trade good)
Ooh, good to know-- @Therealtahu given how often the narrative behind Wildcat Prospecting comes up, you should add this to your postIt's technically that the managers get to pocket the difference as part of their reward, but yes, the 'Crown' owns everything.
Like, technically how it works is that the Office of the King has administrative control over all the lands, as they are to be worked by the People for the good of the gods and People, and then distributes out the actual work to subordinates because one person can't do everything. The kingship is a divine position, with the assumption that the gods directly influence the elections via both the possible candidates being selected and the consensus of the electors. This is why the idea that the king's patron god being the current King of the Gods has any traction, in that obvious this is information that would be revealed by the divine. It's basically a "the conditions on Earth are a reflection of divine will" argument.
Gosh I love our culture q=qOh hey, at some point after i stopped checking for updates yesterday, the action list got updated, and we officially have an option to expand into the lowlands, since i'm pretty sure "south of cataracts" is the "south of badlands" location for the dam...still don't really want to expand much while doing the megaproject, especially since it'd be into the lowlands which we aren't as used to working with, but we should have the megaproject done before the climate stops being unstable, and so long as thats the case the HK shouldn't be able to take this back...
Also, @Academia Nut shouldn't our forest slots be different? Its been several turns, a secondary expand forests, a propogation of our march that you said would give us forest slots, and two mines since then (though i'm not sure if mercury loses a slot), so while i'm not sure if we'll have open slots afterwards, shouldn't it be something like 7/7 or 8/8 now?
Ooh, good to know-- @Therealtahu given how often the narrative behind Wildcat Prospecting comes up, you should add this to your post![]()
?
SHHHHHHH