Clearly this means Quality is absolutely the best possible counter to the Not!Persians as we can pull a Not!300. There's no way a movie can lie to me.![]()
Just means we need to put forests everywhere.
![:V :V :V](/styles/sv_smiles/xenforo/emot-v.gif)
Clearly this means Quality is absolutely the best possible counter to the Not!Persians as we can pull a Not!300. There's no way a movie can lie to me.![]()
what is the narrative logic of the overturn suspicion? does it include one or more study metal?
Borgalicious...forcibly re-educating everyone...built up shared thinking space.
That film is totally 100% factClearly this means Quality is absolutely the best possible counter to the Not!Persians as we can pull a Not!300. There's no way a movie can lie to me.![]()
@Necratoid Its still useful but its not what we thoughtIt's the shamans coming to a consensus that that belief is wrong and then forcibly re-educating everyone that its stupid and they should forget about it (along with some other components), using up a lot of the built up shared thinking space.
Iknowrite? Hollywood is fundamentally incapable of lying, like the Fae.
This still sounds to me like you are saying "First War in forever + Golden Age will create Stupid", basic logic which translates to me as "The Golden Age is worthless because it is being corrupted by the War."Not true. I care that the first war in forever is going to synergize with the Golden Age and lead to stupid.
Not that 5x study metal couldn't evolve observance on its own.
Golden Age Started!
Requirements Discovered: At least two stats maxed out, maximum stability
Benefits: +1 Prestige for first Golden Age, +1 Econ Expansion/turn, special sudden advancements possible
Ends with: 0 or lower stability, ???
Possibly.
2 of the options ARE it transforming to a higher form. Wait is saying 'eh, its fine'I'm voting to wait to see if our mysticism will transmute into a higher form.
Untrue. AN said that Loyalty is the honor trait that leads to discipline.
2 of the options are "let's alter or expand our spiritual values" not "let's transmute the system as a whole to a higher form"2 of the options ARE it transforming to a higher form. Wait is saying 'eh, its fine'
To be fair, an honour trait that revolves around being better and more devoted warriors will probably have the knock on effect of leading to better discipline and dedication- simply because our culture is already has a pretty big emphasis on dedication in service to the People- what with near universally being considered a dour and overly industrious folk by outsider.Untrue. AN said that Loyalty is the honor trait that leads to discipline.
A society that strives toward perfection... hmmmmEstablishing an ethos of always aspiring to do better, or at least making 'sufficient' harder to achieve would do a lot to enable other advances and cultural traits.
Why is this a con?
Since when has upgrading a social value ever resulted in a bad thing?-Symphony - We COULD maybe go even more creepy hivemind on people. But It can lead to societal tunnel vision.
There is all of that and I've had some thoughts of my own while planning.To be fair, an honour trait that revolves around being better and more devoted warriors will probably have the knock on effect of leading to better discipline and dedication- simply because our culture is already has a pretty big emphasis on dedication in service to the People- what with near universally being considered a dour and overly industrious folk by outsider.
I will say, Loyalty is getting more and more appealing to me and I think it is surprisingly manageable to us thanks to our cultural values, but I think it's easier to transition to that once we emphasise training and teaching our warriors more. The emphasis on training should further promote versatility and with that our warriors at large can gain a better understanding of how each role intermeshed and fits onto a battlefield. I think people insisting Quality is bad simply because it focuses mostly on making our doodz better is giving it too little credit. Keep in mind these are cultural values as opposed to purely militaristic values. And that means if we have a culture that encourages our warriors to be the best they can be, we'll probably develop a culture that emphasises being better warleaders/chiefs as well and that encourages military innovation in a big way. Establishing an ethos of always aspiring to do better, or at least making 'sufficient' harder to achieve would do a lot to enable other advances and cultural traits.
We're going to want some semblance of cultural values for all three of these aspects eventually. Quality to promote military professionalism, quantity to encourage a large and complex standing army, and loyalty to establish esprit de corps and loyalty to the state.
Sometimes when we evolve a social value the penalty gets harsher.Since when has upgrading a social value ever resulted in a bad thing?