We have heroic Diplomacy, right? @Academia Nut , can't we explicitly gather up the chiefs, explain our position and say that we're deliberately not endorsing anyone to avoid the appearance of impropriety, and that we want any bid for kingship on our son's part to be considered entirely on its' own merits? This seems like exactly the sort of tricky explanation that a Diplomacy Hero should be able to pull off.
EDIT: Or just say "as one of the foremost candidates is my son, I'm recusing myself from this process unless you pick a moron"?
We have heroic Diplomacy, right? @Academia Nut , can't we explicitly gather up the chiefs, explain our position and say that we're deliberately not endorsing anyone to avoid the appearance of impropriety, and that we want any bid for kingship on our son's part to be considered entirely on its' own merits? This seems like exactly the sort of tricky explanation that a Diplomacy Hero should be able to pull off.
FTFY.Starting to feel our SUPERIORITY here. *raises drink to scrubs gone by* Peaceful rest.
Remember that our current king/queen has poor martial. Instead of taking the reins, she gave control to the war chief (which the son can do as well).The reason I'm so worried about making him King is also the possibility that we might have military problems on our hands and he is mediocre.
And almost certainly would if he was elected.Remember that our current king/queen has poor martial. Instead of taking the reins, she gave control to the war chief (which the son can do as well).
Basically the issue is that he is such a good candidate that even going "I'm recusing myself to avoid bias" makes everyone go "Huh, must be something wrong with him we haven't seen, there is literally no reason other than him being her son not to vote for him".
Except it's at least as much emphasis on hereditary as the advice we spurned. There's a reason it undermines the Legitimacy of the Elective Monarchy.It's not hereditary mate, it's just the son is so good that everybody thinks he's too good and so they won't vote for him.
It'll still be semi-elected.
Always cheat first, second and third in war.[X] Send an envoy to request the Thunder Speakers rein in youths (-2 Diplomacy, chance of TS king actually complying, small chance of triggering war)
[X] Remain quiet (Next king is probably standard)
Electing him would still push towards hereditary leadership, this time with the added benefit of pissing off the Stallion tribes! Quite rightfully so.
Also, never get involved in a war where you don't hold the winning hand unless you have to.
No! No! And NO!@Academia Nut Can we basically tell him that it's a test? That if he wants to inherit, he has to prove himself like we did and take the position by leveraging his charm and intelligence? I kind of want to unleash someone Heroic on our society and see what they do with it...
And look, we have someone who is heroic in admin to handle our admin concerns, likely ending up as the admin adviser!Remember that our current king/queen has poor martial. Instead of taking the reins, she gave control to the war chief (which the son can do as well).