Paths of Civilization
- Thread starter Academia Nut
- Start date
- Original
- Location
- Somewhere
There are a total of 32 votes for [kick] Megaproject in some fashion with 11 votes for don't kick. There is a total of 57 voters. 57-43= 14 people who haven't made their intention clear. That remainder is significant, pity their kick intention isn't made clear.
- Location
- Hell
Yes, +3 is a perfect time to spend it. 2 works as a perfect buffer if we have more Cosmopolitan Triggers.
Not before.
Ehh, Stability costs 2 Econ as well. What's the point of spend a point in Stability to save two Econ if we need to spend 2 Econ to get it up again?
No, that's 21 votes to kick specific Megaprojects. They don't count for the other. The remainder voters chose not to add Kicker. Not kicking is the default.
- Location
- Panama City
26 now, and that's not how the vote works. If there's more poeple voting FOR kicking a megaproject than people voting AGAINST kicking, then we're kicking. Not voting either way is abstaining.
Plus, I again believe you're being too conservative with stability. +3 is too goddamn excessive.
- Location
- Hell
It's never been addressed before because it's never been an issue before. Hence, my tagging AN to make sure.
yes? I agree that it's excessive? That's why I say that spending at Stability 3 is perfectly acceptable.
- Location
- Illinois
No, I'm pretty sure you have to vote not to kick for it to go through. It makes no sense that votes that don't address the kicking would be added to not kicking in this case.
Pretty sure AN will take it as a case by case basis. So in this case, it is clear that most people want to kick it, so we'd kick it.
- Location
- Panama City
You missed my point. My point is pushing for 3 stability EVER is excessive, unless it's a happy side effect of our actions(like a +stability event or completing a megaproject or two). We should never be spending econ to push for stability 3. We have the perfect time to burn a bit of stability for the chance of completing a megaporject in one turn, and even if it doesn't it insures that no matter what we complete it in two, and even if we kick we will have stability 2 at the end.
Last edited:
- Location
- Hell
Why wouldn't not kicking be the default?
I haven't added Not Kick to my vote under the assumption that that was how it worked. You vote for things you want. Not to stop the things you don't want.
Umi-san
Procrastinating.
- Location
- ꙮ
*sighs*
y'all, haven't we kicked something before? how did it work then?
Ghostdevil
The Devil of Ghosts
- Location
- United States
All other kicks were the consensus >.> by far
- Location
- Hell
I've never pushed for Stability 3. I've pushed for Stability 2 and spend as necessity dictates. If we manage to get another point above that, then I'm all for spending it.
I don't make bets like that.
The majority voted to kick, so it wasn't an issue before. Hence why I've asked AN.
- Location
- Illinois
Because if 30 voters want to kick, and 7 don't, it makes no sense to not kick?
Also, if they don't vote for kicking or not kicking, why would the extra voters be assigned to not kicking? They didn't vote for that option, so it should be assumed that they don't have a preference until otherwise stated.
- Location
- Panama City
....then why are you saying to wait for stability 3 before spending stability? You're contradicting yourself.
Umi-san
Procrastinating.
- Location
- ꙮ
okay and did the people didn't want to kick vote "Don't Kick" or what?
Ghostdevil
The Devil of Ghosts
- Location
- United States
Only 20 want to kick and 11 want to NOT kick
With plenty of non voters for either
- Location
- Illinois
11 is for kicking the garden, not for not kicking.
- Location
- Panama City
and
Last edited:
- Location
- Illinois
- [X] [Kick] Don't kick
Number of voters: 7
Somebodynobody10, Xantalos, RulerOfNothing, Manget, Marlin, Inspirit, Veci - [X] [Kick] Saltern
Number of voters: 23
Umi-san, Alex pears, Killer_Whale, tryrar, Tylonius, SpeckofStardust, hylas240, Duesal, keenscythe, Spectrum, NotteBoy97, godofsmallthings, HidCyan, Powerofmind, StarkDemise,notgreat, veekie, DkArthas, Katsuragi, SirKaid, Frankite316, redzonejoe, pblur - [X] [Kick] The Garden
Number of voters: 11
kalugin, maximillian, Mannan, Abby Normal, drake_azathoth, Karugus, Reader of all, Citino, Lilithium, pbluekan, Shadowend
Ghostdevil
The Devil of Ghosts
- Location
- United States
Oh misread the vote thing, I did just glance at it opps
- Location
- Panama City
there's 4 misformatted votes for kicking Saltern that you're not including there
- Location
- Illinois
Yeah, I was just too lazy to add them. The point is made either way.
- Location
- The underworld
is it possible to have a map of were everyone is
and a timeline because i think a thousand year have gone by sense the beginning
- Location
- Hell
Except they are voting for kicking different projects.
This would be like the situation way earlier in the quest where we had trouble with the votes where people had the same subvote, except for different projects. There is no reason those would be counted as the same.
I am not.
We start megaproject. We go to two.
We don't kick. We stay at two.
Megaproject finishes. We go to three.
Spend.
Again, I don't see it a necessity to spend a Stabilty on this project.
No not clear. I was under the assumption I didn't have to vote Not Kick to not kick. I doubt I am the only one. It has never been presented as having to vote that way.
There we go Citino.