- Location
- Hell
Definition of Fair Weather FriendsThen I expect to oppose you in crisis and support you in stable times. Fair enough.
![:V :V :V](/styles/sv_smiles/xenforo/emot-v.gif)
It's the best we can ask for in politics.
Definition of Fair Weather FriendsThen I expect to oppose you in crisis and support you in stable times. Fair enough.
Admittedly nobles in historic times did useful things, but in equitable societies with equal-ish access to the necessary resources, they serve no purpose that commoners and bureaucrats don't. Their use as politicians, artists, diplomats, and capitalists was due solely to their access to resources which they limited to and among themselves.I mean an entire class of nobles and royalty doesn't create people who contribute nothing, their a class of politicians, artists, diplomats, capitalists. Generalizing an entire group of powerful, typically well-educated and pretty big in population people isn't very genuine
Probably, but it depends on the crisis.Then I expect to oppose you in crisis and support you in stable times. Fair enough.
The guaranteed solution is making the Old Stallion king. It's the most conservative move: the only certain way to weather the crisis, and has a well defined impact.
If we only go down to diplo 6 our provinces can take trade actions that will passively raise our diplo. Also, I just don't want to cut off all trade.We have 9 Diplo we can go to 5 to guarantee not having a war, especially not while the crisis is active
Bro, no, why?? Do Festival + Secondary GS, it costs the same thing and provides the same stability but also makes a festival *dedicated to the law.* We already have 2 dedicated to growth and pleasure, so let's have 1 dedicated to taxes and 1 dedicated to the law. Plz complete the set.Grand Sacrifice, secondary to main upgrade, -3 econ, +2 Stability, +1 crisis fix turn
Turn after
[Main] More boats?
[Secondary] Study Stars?
[Secondary] Art/Econ/Mysticism thing?
Except it solves nothing and pushes us too far in the opposite direction. Giving up hardly counts as a solutionThe guaranteed solution is making the Old Stallion king. It's the most conservative move: the only certain way to weather the crisis, and has a well defined impact.
I think we need to err on the side of conservatism and deal with the minor issues from his suboptimality, since its the only path that guarantees us time to fix and improve things down the road.
why do you always bring up points that are easy hooks for a rebuttalExcept it solves nothing and pushes us too far in the opposite direction. Giving up hardly counts as a solution
Cwriid and the Young Stallions are the minor issue here. We have a crisis that has higher priority to fix.
Installing him as heir ends the crisis. That's my point; I agree the crisis is top priority, so I want to vote the option that immediately fixes it.Except it solves nothing and pushes us too far in the opposite direction. Giving up hardly counts as a solution
Cwriid and the Young Stallions are the minor issue here. We have a crisis that has higher priority to fix.
Except that's the thing, the access to resources is the only reason...Admittedly nobles in historic times did useful things, but in equitable societies with equal-ish access to the necessary resources, they serve no purpose that commoners and bureaucrats don't. Their use as politicians, artists, diplomats, and capitalists was due solely to their access to resources which they limited to and among themselves.
Minimizing the limitations is thus key. Allowing for monopolization (of land, of wealth, of education, of political positions) is the antithesis of this.Except that's the thing, the access to resources is the only reason...
Resources are ultimately limited so not everyone is going to be able to do these things. Especially during these eras, Even in our society that we created that requires a little SOD to accept does this happen.
Next Turn:
Main The Law + Kicker
Festival
Grand Sacrifice?
Turn After:
Main Holy Sites
Main More Boats? Chariots?
main gs == festival + GS in both cost and stab gain.considering that we lose one Stab this mid turn, we should either put off the kicker and/or do a main GS the next turn and probably even the turn after that one as we need to bank up Stab for the LoO triggers that will come now that the war has begun
Not because his ideas wouldn't work (it would revert the tax reform), but due to out of character bias against land ownership.
While those who already had the best land and the most resources stood to lose out, as they heard the voices of those with less they knew that they could not continue on without the situation eventually growing violent. More than that, there is a definite appeal to the idea of farming as a unified group, of carefully managing the land without having to worry about whose grain is whose because it all goes into the group pot. The clever among the haves also soon realizes that just because its a group effort doesn't mean that individual plots need be managed by a group, and that the best way to convince the person in charge who should manage individual territories would be past success.
main gs == festival + GS in both cost and stab gain.
We maybe could do it the turn after, depends on status of stab, comm, and literacy req's. Finishing The Law is extremely important due to how it lets us know what req's it actually satisfies and to what extent.
Of course it's justified considering we have the social value harmony. Our style of government relies upon ties with other people, and while his diplomatic skills can to some extent compensate, electing him means undoing nearly three generations of work. If you're lifetime has been dedicated to making this project work, and someone comes in wishing to just do away with it of course they're not going to be happy.Apparently saying "you ain't gonna be king since most people in power don't like what you are selling" to a double hero in a meritocracy is a justified cause. Not because his ideas wouldn't work (it would revert the tax reform), but due to out of character bias against land ownership.
I'll hold you to that. Though, at least you're realistic about the potential for the system to not work anyway even if we solve the crisis. More than can be said for anyone else...Well we can't delay it anymore, and reverting back after all this effort is just giving up, i'd rather suffer the consequences of our greed and hubris than surrender because we couldn't deal with them.
Apparently saying "you ain't gonna be king since most people in power don't like what you are selling" to a double hero in a meritocracy is a justified cause. Not because his ideas wouldn't work (it would revert the tax reform), but due to out of character bias against land ownership.