I'm... more than a little uncomfortable with how much the plans leave to the QMs.
For instance, in
@Radvic's plan:
Keiko could make a good pro con analysis of us joining for any parties which she had adequate information on
We should not leave this to the QMs; we're perfectly capable of making a CBA and we should.
We can talk about our general philosophy and how that is our primary reason for joining Leaf
What is this? Like, yeah, it can be extrapolated from the past, but do we really want to make Velorien do that?
Even my preferred plan,
@Enjou's, falls into the same trap:
The best strategy would likely be to have Keiko come up with the best cost-benefit analysis possible to convince the Naras, who can then persuade the Yamanakas, and then bring the Akimichis on board.
So, I cannot in good conscience vote for them. [X] Lore Update
e: On that note, though, there is a... relatively dangerous, politically, way we could get the Yamanaka on board: Call on Ino as a character witness. She was there for and impressed by Hazou's speech to Jiraiya.
Additionally, I think it's a mistake for Hazou to be completely silent in the context of the discussion with the clans. Sure, leave most things to Mari and Jiraiya, but when given the chance to, he can be damned convincing.
He speaks from the heart, and that more than anything might be what convinces the Aburame that the team is being genuine. Sure, they won't go for his naive idealistic thing like J (to some extent) or the team has, but he
has great charisma, he just has a habit of sticking his foot in his mouth. So, clear the speech with J and Mari first.