- Location
- USA
That's in part of why I chose the personals I did for next turn. If it goes well it could lead to say, Doof helping Ludivine tinker when she wanders.
DoofQuest- a Disney Villains Victorious CK2-Style Quest
- Thread starter Made in Heaven
- Start date
- Crossover
That's in part of why I chose the personals I did for next turn. If it goes well it could lead to say, Doof helping Ludivine tinker when she wanders.
[X] Have Tobe take him to the time authorities.
Also, it might give not only Ludivine but Doof himself sone character development IE Much like LOVEMUFFIN, a reminder for Doof of the consequences not thinking things through can have.
Last edited:
Mojave
BWAAAH
- Pronouns
- He
Doing a chat with Ludivine personal plus some Ludivine self-reflection personal next turn might ameliorate that.
- Pronouns
- He/Him
I'm pretty sure her trait is meant to be bad and doesn't need reworking, it's based on her Absent-Minded trait after all which is definitely negative
I've got no real problems with how things turned out, even when we still lost Ludivine it wasn't as crippling as some were making it out to be, I think there was a lot of overreaction even if I do agree it was somewhat unfair how it played out.
I've got no real problems with how things turned out, even when we still lost Ludivine it wasn't as crippling as some were making it out to be, I think there was a lot of overreaction even if I do agree it was somewhat unfair how it played out.
- Location
- USA
We've been told her trait could be improved before. This seems like the best opportunity to improve it.
Last edited:
- Location
- USA
I mean, just using her stats alone is like trying to do a learning action in the pre council system with a hero with 2 learning and no loyalty or traits.
We would never do that.
It wasn't negative before. It would just have her pick a different learning action of equivalent difficulty. It was random.
The way it is now on the council really has moved it into more a a strictly negative trait unless we roll insanely well.
We would have to roll a nat 100 to hit a dc of 140. We have a lot of learning actions that high or higher. It's not unlikely that at some point our lowest 5 have dcs she literally can't hit.
We would never do that.
It wasn't negative before. It would just have her pick a different learning action of equivalent difficulty. It was random.
The way it is now on the council really has moved it into more a a strictly negative trait unless we roll insanely well.
We would have to roll a nat 100 to hit a dc of 140. We have a lot of learning actions that high or higher. It's not unlikely that at some point our lowest 5 have dcs she literally can't hit.
Last edited:
@Arathnorn regarding the potion brewer.... can it be used in the future to brew multiple potions of a kind we want it and not random one offs?
Lab_Accident
A 2D 1D4
- Location
- Your dreams
A normal failure typically isn't bad for us. She would simply not succeed. It's the crit fails that are bad, and under the new system those are much less likely.
Her trait is mechanically a 1/6 chance to have an about 1/2 chance of completing a low DC National Learning action for free, with roughly similar odds of a Crit failure and Crit success.
Most of the time, it does nothing one way or another. There's a small chance of it doing something pretty cool every once in a while, completing a third National for free. And then there's a minuscule chance of it either going critically wrong or gloriously right.
Last edited:
@Arathnorn Could we the pass this failure off as corporate sabotage? I mean We've had someone steal from us last turn and we're revealing a mole this turn.
Lab_Accident
A 2D 1D4
- Location
- Your dreams
Now that everybody has mostly calmed down, there is one thing I would like to bring up about this most recent mess: If everything had happened exactly the same as it did, but Ludivine had rolled a crit success on Flubber instead of a crit failure, lowering the DC on Campaigning for Flubber, would anybody have called that unfair at all?
It can, we have an action for that. We get to choose between brewing two random ones or one controlled one.
Last edited:
- Location
- Somewhere
[X] Have Tobe take him to the time authorities.
I'm glad Tobe has his brain in the right place as a law-abiding citizen that he is.
I'm glad Tobe has his brain in the right place as a law-abiding citizen that he is.
[X] Let him stay in the boiler room
- Pronouns
- She/Her
I might have vaguely reminded the QMs about how we should have had the option to do XP? But it wouldn't have been a big deal or anything, no.
Some other people might still have complained about doing Flubber at all, given Ludivine herself vetoed it.
- Location
- Somewhere nearby.
If we want to do that we should develop the sublight drives and try to find a way to minimize them.
- Location
- Bloomington, IN
There definitely would have been less salt, but the pure fact that it was a Flubber action at all definitely would have raised no small amount of ire, especially if the opinion drop still applied.
- Location
- Two hours away
- Pronouns
- He/Him
Maybe the Hopper Muppet has a trait for wrangling idiots?
yes, but i was asking if it will be possible to brew multiple controlled ones in the future
- Location
- USA
I asked about a potion making subsidiary and this is the answer I got. But it might be out of date so don't take it for gospel.
- Location
- USA
If we could make specific potions it might be worth it to make that potion that gives a character a extra personal action every turn.
We could give it to a councillor so they could do a personal action each turn.
We could knock out Goofys college degree in a couple turns. Give him a nice boost.
We could give it to a councillor so they could do a personal action each turn.
We could knock out Goofys college degree in a couple turns. Give him a nice boost.
- Location
- Peterborough, NH, USA
That would be amazing. We might finally have time for that garden of his.
