NSMS
Probably evil, unfortunately.
- Location
- A rapidly widening tear in the fabric of reality
On a scale of 1 to 10, how doomed are we?
![:V :V :V](/styles/sv_smiles/xenforo/emot-v.gif)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how doomed are we?
Sure, and presumably, if we published a preliminary paper which stated you could trap a Wisdom's Asp in a mirror box and get liquid Runesmith Favor out of it, and the Colleges just so happened upon an Apprentice with a Wisdom's Asp, they would give it a shot, because they would know to.I have in fact suggested this exact thing. If we were to do this, I suppose I'd accede to publishing AV early so they know what they're trying to do and why, but ideally we'd just tell them it'll save the apprentice and the results would be useful to our ongoing project.
If you want a background roll for getting another source of AV, this one - which doubles as a method of saving hapless Apprentices - would be nice.
Fire is really a better example than you're thinking, because while yes lighting something flammable leads to it burning it specifically isn't irreversible. Making hydrocarbons from carbon dioxide and water is a thing that can be done (photosynthesis is a thing) - it's just that for assorted physics reasons it's much easier to go from hydrocarbon to CO2 and water than it is to go from CO2 and water to a hydrocarbon.Probably not, the reaction looks to be one way, like a fire. You can't unburn a torch and you can't make the undifferentiated matter of the polar realms from the very much differentiated winds.
It's Warhammer, baseline is 8.
Sure, and presumably, if we published a preliminary paper which stated you could trap a Wisdom's Asp in a mirror box and get liquid Runesmith Favor out of it, and the Colleges just so happened upon an apprentice with a Wisdom's Asp, they would give it a shot, because they would know to.
It's the industrial processing for Wisdom's Asps that's so ill-advised, not snagging the odd Asp that's already haunting a Wizard. There's no reason the Colleges couldn't fish for those 1% chances among endangered Apprentices once they knew how, and they wouldn't need our express instruction to try.
I assume we aren't going to get in a lot of trouble if we don't roll a nat 1.
Ranald laughs at the cheek.I wonder what the Deceiver's effects are when we say "This sentence is false."
Not a bad idea. We can talk to Belegar about it.I mean, if we honestly plan to rob the Cloak of Bears ... literally just ask some Dawi our options, if they want us to steal it or if we can just burn it, or if there's some burial ritual, or what.
It's not like their going to rat us out.
So after the big disastrous incident they destroyed the book.History indicates that its insights are the sort that get the Colleges outlawed for fifteen years and get the reader executed by the Grand Theogonist.
Uh, why are we talking about stealing the Cloak of Beards like it's something the thread has already committed to doing? Is there any indication that Mathilde even knows it exists? It was brought up three hours ago in the context of a joke about Anti-Kragg weaponry; this isn't, like, a long-running ambition of ours. It's literally never been brought up in the narrative, and the narrative is already stuffed fit to bursting with other shiny things. We do not need more long-term schemes for Mathilde to chase down.
So after the big disastrous incident they destroyed the book.
...right? They did destroy the book they believe will send any reader insane enough to kick off a localised storm of magic right?
I'm pretty sure that paper was already written by someone else, actually, hence where we got the idea. The problem is catching them in a specific way, and I don't think even Mathilde is entirely sure how she managed it.This is a good point, at the very least writing a paper on how to trap a Wisdom's Asp wouldn't be a bad idea considering how many wizards are hunted by the things.
We could save a decent amount of Wizard lives by doing this. Like, if people don't wanna mention the AV thing, alright, but it's honestly in retrospect a little irresponsible that we haven't written a paper on how to not die if you're being hunted by a Wisdom's Asp yet.
"My God Weber, you've solved the paradox! It really is false!"I wonder what the Deceiver's effects are when we say "This sentence is false."
We're going to Ulthuan, Mathilde hangs out with dwarves, Mathilde worships a thief god. There's no commitment, just talk.Uh, why are we talking about stealing the Cloak of Beards like it's something the thread has already committed to doing? Is there any indication that Mathilde even knows it exists? It was brought up three hours ago in the context of a joke about Anti-Kragg weaponry; this isn't, like, a long-running ambition of ours. It's literally never been brought up in the narrative, and the narrative is already stuffed fit to bursting with other shiny things. We do not need more long-term schemes for Mathilde to chase down.
And we would like to be invited back at some point, yes? Unless you think we could really pull off such a heist undetected and without any suspicion falling on us.We're going to Ulthuan, Mathilde hangs out with dwarves, Mathilde worships a thief god.
It's only a small minority of High Elves who cherish the thing, the same people who keep shaving Dwarfs to this day. Most would be agreeable to not having to acknowledge it exists anymore.Wait wait wait, why are we robbing the Cloak of Beards? I thought we wanted to be invited back to Ulthuan after the Elf trip.
So, considering they just let anybody into the Light College to take their stuff, when are we making our trip?That would have been the sensible thing to do, so you can be certain that they didn't.
Yep.And we would like to be invited back at some point, yes? Unless you think we could really pull off such a heist undetected and without any suspicion falling on us.