Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
[X] [RIDER] Mist-shrouded Grey Wizard on a Shadowsteed
[X] [RIDER] Great Cat Knight
[X] [SEVIROSCOPE] Visual

I'm not really fussed about the difference between these two.
 
I'm voting for anything not Mathilde first, then I'll vote for anything not cuddly looking.

Mathilde is gauch, number 1. Second, the spell will be miscast. I expect we will eventually, and others definitely will. When it's miscast, do you want the miscaster looking like a person who accidently let a monster off a leash, or the person who set his friend on you? Because if people think we are in complete control, and they attack a friendly, that adds up to treason. And in the heat of battle, someone might do something stupid and try to kill the miscaster for treason. More, there will be stories told about this blaming the apparation. This goes double for a witch hunter with a grudge to bear.

It's not a huge issue for the golds if there are stories about that time the golden hounds got loose and started killing everyone. It's not good, but it's not "we need to kill all the golds" level of bad. Do we want stories about that time a bunch of summoned grey wizards brutalized the front lines of the Imperial Army? Because that's how you destroy a reputation.

Make them monstrous. Don't make them friendly knights, definitely don't make them look like grey wizards, and most definitely don't make them us.

At the very least, there aren't knights on great cats. So it's not inherently bad. The Hexwraiths are better, IMO.

Stories about some grey wizards summoning some not-daemons and having them attack the Imperial army are not better than stories about the Grey Wizards riding over and hitting them with swords.

In fact, I'd say the not-daemon summoning is much, much worse reputationally.
 
Last edited:
Basically; a Mathilde rider is a near free option.

If you see no downside to slapping your own face on something that most people regard either as or as the next best thing to a demon of Khorne, then yes.

I want more separation.

I'm pretty sure it does? It does it in slices, like an MRI, and then you combine those slices to form the 3d image.

Auditory would also struggle with changes over time I think, if you're trying to do the 3D mapping.

With patience and a good ear you'd be able to map out a three-dimensional construct."

I'm mostly going with the way that the speculation on visual involved eight exposures from a single angle over time to work- you'd need multiple overall exposures from different angles to start on 3d, while just tracking volume should give you a pretty good idea of distance-from-sensor with the audio.

Thinking one does the top/front/left view version of 3d, the other one does a grey scale depth map.

The thing is; for Mathilde this won't be battle magic. We've had confirmation that the summoning spell for it could be made to work with the Staff of Mistery, so it's at worst Fiendishly complex, so Mathilde can cast it relatively routinely with her Magic score.

"Could be".

So I'd like to treat it as battle magic until we've actually hatched that chicken.
 
[X] [RIDER] Knight
-[X] Conventional Empire (Mathilde's Heraldry)

[X] [SEVIROSCOPE] Auditory

Conventional knight is still subtle nod without being the cringe equal of plastering your own face on your car. So that's my prefer. And Auditory seems generally more usefull for everyone, and gives us better experience for creating the harder visual one.
 
Then that was about a theoretical entirely new spell that would need to be built from scratch, rather than being able to piggyback off the Gehenna's Golden Hounds techniques. Mathilde will be creating a basic 'deploy critter from me with instructions' spell as part of this process that will not be mist-themed and may or may not be Battle Magic.
Well, doing the fog thing with the Rider in Red was something of a long shot anyway.

Doing original non-Gehenna experimentation on the subject should probably be saved for the Whispering Darkness or the Black Essence since those are already fairly Ulgu-y, the Whispering Darkness in particular already being described as a fog-like entity.
 
A tally, though I have not edited it to merge votes, so might be slightly unreliable.
Adhoc vote count started by Aliya on Jul 25, 2023 at 2:04 PM, finished with 711 posts and 81 votes.
 
-[ ] Demigryph Knight

-Tactical(General) - A Demigryph knight should be approximately the right asskicking level, and enemies would likely respond with an appropriate level of force. Right propa intimidating though.
-Strategic(General) - Demigryphs don't exactly grow on trees, but the lack of apparent affiliation should keep things confused.
-Tactical(Personal) - No unusual personal advantage.
Feline mounts are better at dealing with single, powerful targets. That's a personal advantage, I'd say. Especially as multiples are apparently better than the sum of their parts when it comes to taking down a big bad.
 
[X] [RIDER] Great Cat Knight
[X] [SEVIROSCOPE] Visual

The Great Cat Knight just sounds fun, I never particularly cared about apparitions so I'm just picking the one I find more interesting.

I want to create both versions of the Sevirscope because they cover two very different areas, the auditory one would help with broaldy detecting and identifying magic and the visual one would be for research.

I can already think of two things the visual Sevirscope will be incredibly usefull for on top of making some progress on Bok :
- Capturing images of the primordial winds during an AV detonation.
- Allowing for a lot of high end one offs magitech masterpieces to be properly studied by engineers, there is a lot of schizotech in warhammer that is impossible to reproduce and is probably using wierd magical edge cases that no one can figure out.
 
Last edited:
And Mathilde called it a bad idea.

It's a bad idea.

Let's please not do mounted wraiths.

I think you are reading too much into:
so easily mistakable for a Hexwraith might not be the best of ideas
Like there may be better ideas, but that doesn't make the wraits a bad idea in itself.
Most of the problems you are bringing up are going to be problems no matter what form we vote for, everyone is always trying to obscure their aparitions spells are actual aparition and they still get questions if they are medling with daemons from time to time. I guarantee no matter what we pick they will finds a way to raise a fuss.
 
[X] [RIDER] Great Cat Knight
[X] [RIDER] Mist-shrouded Grey Wizard on a Shadowsteed
[X] [SEVIROSCOPE] Visual
 
Especially as multiples are apparently better than the sum of their parts when it comes to taking down a big bad.
Just as a note, that was a reference to wolves, not cats.
Of course, but I meant more if horse is good for bulldozing many people and muderkitty is good for ruining one person at a time, what is giant wolf good for ?
Single-target pursuit.
I feel like there'd be a strong secondary specialty of skirmishing against big monsters. Jump in, bite the legs or flanks then GTFO before it stomps you sort of thing.
That would be viable too. Multiple of them would be a really good counter for big monsters. Possibly even more so than actual Winter Wolves, if the rider can't fall off then there's no reason to hold back from the leaping attacks.
 
Stories about some grey wizards summoning some not-daemons and having them attack the Imperial army are no better than stories about the Grey Wizards riding over and hitting them with swords.

In fact, I'd say the not-daemon summoning is much, much worse reputationally.
No. No they are not. Because the story would be X lost control, not X purposely attacked the Imperial army. I'm not completely sold on Hexwraiths, but they are far, far better than grey wizards, which is just asking for Dieter 2: electric boogaloo next Emperor.

As for Hexwraiths looking demonish, we were told by Boney that those in the know would be able to tell the difference. And for those not in the know? Mathilde is the most famous wizard in Sylvania, known for ending the vampire countess. We are the most likely to get away with it. If anything, it's more a not-undead than a not-demon. And since ours isn't skeletal, it deals with that problem as well. Not perfectly, but well enough.

IMO, going full spider/scorpion/some other creature is better than either of these. But both cat knights and Hexwraiths at least aren't making use look purposely bad.

Meanwhile, you are arguing for stamping our face on the face of something that will kill a soldiers battle buddy. That's a bad idea.
 
Last edited:
Feline mounts are better at dealing with single, powerful targets. That's a personal advantage, I'd say. Especially as multiples are apparently better than the sum of their parts when it comes to taking down a big bad.

It's a personal disadvantage. Mathilde's already very good at faxing single powerful targets and less good at faxing hordes which a horse mounted apparition is better at.
 
Alright, with the reveal that we currently cannot apply staff discount to this, I will go with:

[X] [RIDER] Knight
-[X] Conventional Empire (Mathilde's Heraldry w/Wolf mount)

[X] [RIDER] Misty Wraith on top of a Giant Wolf

Because Boney explicitly stated that wolves are the best at anti-big gribblie work, and it is monsters that Mathilde's fancy sword style does literally nothing against. Will it break an infantry line in a single big charge? No. But if it's Battle Magic, then we can Smoke and Mirrors out of the melee blob anyways as part of casting this, so it becomes a moot point. Now it is both an escape and an anti-monster spell, even if they ultimately just end up holding the gribbly down so we can whack it repeatedly with our sword (or in the case of a proper Battle Wizard, repeated Pendulums or one Pit of Shades).
 
Actually, for negative tactical gain. One of the advantages of the Rider is that non-magical weapons are going to go through it IIRC, which is unexpected on a generic knight but completely expected for a spooky ghost.
Damn, I've built up so much dislike against the option it's annoying to see a good argument for it. The trick won't last for long and if it's summoned in the middle of a battlefield it likely won't work at all, but advantage is advantage. Not sure if it's better than a shadowsteed though since for a tricky grey wizard having that decoy option is likely pretty attactive and useful (also anything that boosts nazgul resemblance is always cool).

It's still super cringe to put Mathilde's heraldry on it though (and makes it more identifiable to reduce that good argument). At least with the Mathilde on a shadowsteed option it has good reason to look like Mathilde.
 
[X] [RIDER] Knight
-[X] Conventional Empire

[X] [RIDER] Knight
-[X] Conventional Empire (Mathilde's Heraldry)

[X] [RIDER] Great Cat Knight


[X] [SEVIROSCOPE] Auditory
 
Last edited:
Back
Top