Enterprise:
"I like Bolo stories. Though I think my very favorite twentieth-century fiction is Saberhagen's short story
Wings out of Shadow."
[smiles]
Well see, there's Kantai Collection (the ships are physically fanservice-ey girls), and then there's what I'm doing, which is a bit different.
What I've been doing is, the ship has a personification, and you can visit it- but it's under "vision quest" rules, not under "real life" rules. Only in a very specific sense of the word 'reality' is any of this 'real.' This is why Nash only ever sees the spirit of
Enterprise when she's dreaming, and why the literal
title of the omakes where said spirit appears is
Dreams. Furthermore, precisely because the ship's personification exists only for a highly personal and subjective sense of the word 'exists,' different people experience it differently.
Tisana Bessle saw Enterprise as, for lack of a better term, a friendly warrior-angel. Worf would see her as an (initially) hostile one. Both see only a fraction of her true spiritual nature, but it's the fraction that speaks most intimately to them.
Scotty saw Enterprise in his dreams
as the USS Enterprise. As a man who'd deck Klingons for her honor's sake, he surely could make contact with the spirit if he cared to. And I'm quite sure he did... but he understood the physical body 'underlying' that spirit well enough to encounter her on her own terms, rather than trying to imagine it in human terms.
Nash sees Enterprise as a beautiful woman because she really,
really loves her ship- but doesn't know her like Scotty did. The same goes for Kirk, although the two felt different ways about women and that colors (colored) their interactions with the spirit.
Samhaya Mrr'shan sees Enterprise as a big, powerful, supernatural talking lioness, a being that is to her sort of like a centaur or a sphinx would be to us. Not a subject for attraction or love, but for friendship and loyalty and a sort of big-sisterly awe and inspiration.
So basically, what you see depends on how you understand the metaphysical significance of "this is the ship." And on whether you really
know that ship. Nash may never see her new flagship,
Kumari, in spirit, though I wouldn't rule it out.
And if the old Connie USS
Kongo had a spirit and you met her... Well, I'm pretty sure that to those few who may have known her, she didn't dress up in a weird variation on the theme of miko robes. She didn't yell "DESS!" all the time and do batty things and glomp admirals. At least, you wouldn't see her doing those things unless you, personally, had come to know and love that ship- and unless you, personally, had a very, VERY strange idea of what the USS
Kongo was really like, at heart.
...
Of course, I also try to make everything I do compatible with the idea that it really is all just a string of interrelated stress-induced dreams. However, this is something of a 'death of the author' interpretation; I accept that this interpretation exists and don't intend to rule it out., but it's over my metaphysical dead body.
Okay, to be fair, the hulls DO look different. But then, the refit
Constitution-class looks significantly different from the original design visually. The nacelles have been completely rebuilt, the largely non-glowy deflector dish is replaced by a blue glowy one, there is much higher reliance on torpedo armament (if the movie vs TOS plotting is any guide).
Suffice to say that it's one of those eternal "lumper versus splitter" debates. You can argue for a fundamental break in the design lineage anywhere from the 2245-era Connies to the 2315-era Rennies, but
WHERE do you draw that break? There's no one place to do it that's obviously much less arbitrary than any others. And all four models (Connie-nil, -A, -B, and Rennie) share certain fundamental characteristics of layout, all are built on roughly the same size hull, and the
Renaissance has nearly identical performance to the last-generation refit
Constitutions with the sole noteworthy distinctions of being significantly more durable and better furnished.
So do we 'split' the lineage into three or four distinct types? Or 'lump' them into four subtypes of the same basic design? I mean, the Rennie looks more like an old
Constitution than the modern
Atlas V rocket looks like an old Atlas I rocket.
I can see the Tal Shiar and the equivalent of Naval Intelligence disagreeing, actually. Interservice rivalry can be fierce.
Docana:
"Oh hi there, little birdie of prey! Wanna go FAST together?"
[bounces happily, breaks Warp Twelve in a space-blistering sprint]
Klingon Captain:
"...Eepy."