- Location
- Austria
Are you implying something about President N'Gir's reaction?
Because...you're probably right.
I mean...Nomads. Hissing at them is just reasonable.
Are you implying something about President N'Gir's reaction?
Because...you're probably right.
Over the last 3 years the average has been something like 25rp per quarter. Also you are neglecting the 10rp reward per accession and GBZ colonies, unless they are supposed to be included in the 2 per year?Now this is with conservative estimates of RP gain from events and number of colonies started. As simple as using an estimate of 15 RP per quarter we have 44 RP left 2317, 50 rp left 2318, and 72.5 RP left 2319 which would allow 7 boosts over that time period. Conservative estimates only allow one boost.
Well, Excalibur was only mentioned in an omake AFAIK, so if it doesn't actually exist, the dates would line up better and make room for the canon Excelsior refit. Still won't align directly, unless there was a Khitomer crisis-related small build gap.
Well I wanted to go with very low end estimates, and why I put an example of how just 5 more rp per quarter would be a big boost in RP totals, 25 means we are boosting 5 times each research phase. And forgot about the GBZ colonies and bonus rp from members joining. If we assume one colony a year from the GBZ that is an extra 2 income each year, and membership boosts of 10 this year and 20 the next two years of one off. That will give us a cushion for when we get the new generic teams after the current ones graduate in 3 years.Over the last 3 years the average has been something like 25rp per quarter. Also you are neglecting the 10rp reward per accession and GBZ colonies, unless they are supposed to be included in the 2 per year?
This is the only time Oneiros has mentioned the USS Excalibur:IIRC Excalibur was mentioned by Onerios himself when the thread was on a Fall-of-Rogers kick, but not in any threadmarked posts.
Not continuous - regular data packets. Of course, the time delay involved at those distances, even with subspace comms, is considerable, but it is helpful. It became more of a thing when the Miracht was lost, though it has a lot of its origins in the loss of the USS Excalibur, shortly before the start of the quest. Always good to be able to keep tabs on your biggest risk takers, even if only to try to piece together what went wrong, or figure out where to send pick-up crews (Miracht).Of course I'm a bit skeptical we actually have the kind of continuous communication with our EC ships suggested here anyways...
Ah. Shoot.EDIT: Oh god damn it, I just realised we're arguing about a Trolley Problem, except we're on one of the rails.
Stesk:We may be able to trade ressources for tech and starmaps?
Fed: Ressources > Nomads
Nomads: Maps, civ data, tech > Federation
What I'm saying is that it would be easier to destroy ship veterancy than to create. If Excelsior worked its way up to a Blooded crew at some point prior to 2293 despite how little time that offers, the chaos of the post-Khitomer era and its impact on personnel could easily suck the ship back down to 0 XP.I'm not so sure about crew ratings being so easily transferable, since narrative and omakes have implied that some of the increased capabilities of "crew rating" are actual physical changes to the ship. USS Enterprise-B is a special case here, in that its warp core and other systems were supposedly massively tweaked and customized, yet her crew ratings were transferable when she was scuttled. We also have the counterexample of the USS Miracht, which could not transfer her crew rating upon her destruction.
Yes, but those were Explorer Corps ships. You know, the hand-picked "best of the best of the best" elite crews.I'd also like to point out that we did have some Excelsiors start off at blooded or veteran status - see this quoted snapshot of the front page. Enterprise started out at veteran (and ka'Sharren's bonus made that elite). Sarek started out as blooded, or at least was blooded during the Biophage crisis. Courageous, I think started out as blooded - her crew rating increased to veteran in 2302.Q3.
Thankee!That all said, the Khitomer crisis is as good as excuse as any to explain away any partial "reset" in crew ratings like this.
Yeah, the dates don't really line up well at all unless we posit a second three-megaton berth that was decommissioned for some reason. Or blown up by the Klingons or otherwise lost in the early 2290s.Assuming there was only the single 3mt berth at San Francisco available and Excelsior production started in 2380s, not really.
It's made worse by the fact that Kumari was under construction from 2298 to 2302.
Ignoring the canon refit of the Excelsior to remove its prototype transwarp engine, the best schedule we could hope for is:
2276-2282: Excelsior prototype construction
2282-2286: Excalibur construction
2286-2290: Enterprise construction (ST canon commission date was 2293)
2290-2294: Courageous or Sarek construction
2294-2298: Courageous or Sarek construction
2298-2302: Kumari construction
Well, Excalibur was only mentioned in an omake AFAIK, so if it doesn't actually exist, the dates would line up better and make room for the canon Excelsior refit. Still won't align directly, unless there was a Khitomer crisis-related small build gap.
Leslie:Chen loophole abuse. By ordering two prototypes, we get them faster. All be it at greater cost.
We can not start a third hull until the Ambassador and the C are out and checked over.
Oneiros is probably going to give them names like he does for new teams requested in the snakepit, but he might ask for suggestions. The nice thing about them is that they already have a reasonably well defined history. For example Generic Team 4 could be the Isolinear Optics Laboritory.Out of curiosity, when the Generics graduate, have we given any thought to their names? Presumably we will end up giving them names.
Stesk:
I will not condone undertaking initiatives that strategically benefit slavers.
How do having 2 prototype Ambys work for us? I thought we needed to finish prototype (construction + shakedown) before we could order new hulls? or is this an Enterprise exception?
It's definitely an Enterprise exception too. We were told at the time we obtained Chen's bonus that prototyping with it would cause issues. That position was reversed when the Enterprise was lost and the proposal became to build a new Enterprise.Chen loophole abuse. By ordering two prototypes, we get them faster. All be it at greater cost.
We can not start a third hull until the Ambassador and the C are out and checked over.
Also, there are few things that would upset the Hawks more than a hint of Danegeld. If you ever wanted to get Stesk and the Hawks to vote the same way, suggest that.
I'm happy to pay Danegeld.
It's possible (?) that we commissioned from one of the member state berths, I can't remember if they had their own 2.5+ berths at game start. Alternatively, in the wake of the Rogers crisis, the Council slapped Starfleet's hands and transferred a berth with Excelsior capacity to a member world.Yeah, the dates don't really line up well at all unless we posit a second three-megaton berth that was decommissioned for some reason. Or blown up by the Klingons or otherwise lost in the early 2290s.
Rolling finally done. Blech.
I hope you guys like Distress Calls.
...shit. I really hope our overtaxed garrisons don't get anyone killed.Rolling finally done. Blech.
I hope you guys like Distress Calls.
I will say that we've both had our first instance of Chen's bonus in action, and also burned Ainsworth's re-roll for the year....shit. I really hope our overtaxed garrisons don't get anyone killed.
That's a shame. It might be worth asking about, in case we meet the prereqs earlier than expected - I have a good feeling about those Deep Space stations!
We may be able to trade ressources for tech and starmaps?
Fed: Ressources > Nomads
Nomads: Maps, civ data, tech > Federation
So back to the Hishmeri Septs being slavers/raiders, do we want to start making plans now, before they hit our border? Or should we kick it up to the President, and having the decision of which one of the options below taken by the head of the Federation, instead of us? I'd prefer for a plan to be in place before they potentially hit our borders, rather than scrambling afterwards. Plus, getting the big stick ready now makes sense, rather than hoping our border patrols can hold them off.
1) gather a fleet, neutralize them as combatants so they don't bother us or anyone else until they rearm themselves, and free their slaves while we're at it,
2) use a fleet to escort them through Fed space, and let someone else deal with them
3) use a fleet to convince them to not enter/go somewhere else in general/go somewhere else in particular,
4) something else entirely
Edit: Heh, looks like the discussion already started. So it's basically fleet or diplo, at the sec.