No, I can't assume a thing we may never get around to purchasing. However it would only shave off 5 months at best on the 'wave', as I'm pretty sure prototype build times cannot be reduced for any reason.
Yes. Prototype build times can only be reduced at the cost of extra behind-the-scenes dice rolls for not-so-hilarious breakdowns, which is Oneiros's way of saying: Please don't.
 
Dunno if you should expect anything approaching common sense in that. This is coming from the person who suggested we use the Biophage against Cardassia.

What?

Don't we still have those samples of the Biophague that we used in order to create a vaccine? I know we have distributed the vaccine to all participants in the original outbreak, as well as all federation affiliates, but I doubt we have provided the vaccine to the Cardassians. If things start going belly up for us, it may provide a good final F.U. to the Cardassians without threatening members or affiliates of the Federation.

What the fuck!?

For anyone curious.

Based on current designs, current ETC for the Ambassador Prototype is 2323.Q4. Current ETC for the first "wave" of Ambassadors built after the prototype is 2329.Q1.

So in other words, take the entire in-universe timespan this game has been running and add that to the current date. That's when you can expect Starfleet will have more than a single Ambassador. These big ships sure are long term projects, aren't they?

That isn't good enough!

Starfleet Ambitions:
Have Ambassador prototype into production by 2321

We promised 2321 and we will deliver.
 
Actually, we know that sensors (science) do play some sort of role in detection - we just don't know the specifics and how they're applicable to the GBZ. There have only been narrative hints.

Ainsworth allocated her two Centaur-As to the escort force - we all assumed that this was just because Miranda-As would be more efficient on the primary task force, but what if there was more to it than that?

It's not worth keeping around those Centaurs for such a nebulous reason (unless Oneiros clarifies what science stat is good for there), but I also wouldn't straight out say that there's no reason to have Centaur-As in the GBZ.
Which is why I used that key word 'almost.' :p

R U telling me that this /isn't/ Manticorian Star Empire simulator?!?!?!?
Honestly, calling this level of stupidity "Manticoran Star Empire Simulator" might be an insult to David Weber; the only antagonist he's ever written being this stupid was being actively sabotaged by spies that had comprehensively infiltrated and subverted the top levels of its own government. The People's Republic of Haven and even most of the minor 'third galaxy' opponents at least TRY to be thinking about what the hell they're doing and react to changing situations by perceiving threats and reacting to them... sort of. Usually.

wait, weren't we playing with the "Abundant Lead deposits on Enemy species homeworlds"?
Until such time as we are informed that the Explorer Corps has discovered the Pakleds, I'm going with 'no.' :p :D

Dunno if you should expect anything approaching common sense in that. This is coming from the person who suggested we use the Biophage against Cardassia.
Good point.

Actually, that was more an idea to open up the possibility of use of the M.A.D. doctrine.
It is also:
1) Incredibly ill-advised,
2) Profoundly opposed to the spirit of this quest, on such a level that the QM rightly threatened to slap us with Militarization points if the quest-goers as a whole even started seriously considering doing it or wanting to do it,
3) A very effective way to replace a bad problem (Federation conquered by Cardassian overlords) with a worse problem (all life in the galaxy literally being melted down into screaming puddles of agony), and
4) Did I mention how utterly, insanely vicious and evil doing such a foul and nihilistic thing would be? There's a reason there was near-100% opposition in the thread the last time it came up.

So no. Just... no. No 'I was just trying to do this/that.' It was, very simply, a deeply bad idea.On many levels.

I was sort of hoping you'd grown to look back on that suggestion of yours and think "wow, what was I thinking?"

As for using the loophole, it was primarily a reaction to how empty that section of space is, and I thought it would be a good idea to scout the area for possible colony sites, or to locate Syndraxian instillations.
1) We don't know that it's empty. The map is empty, but that doesn't mean nothing is there.
2) You didn't suggest "scouting" it, you suggested flying supply convoys through it and "claiming" it ourselves. That is a much more ambitious operation that we are not remotely equipped to carry out.
3) You still haven't even begun to address the question of how the Cardassians and Sydraxians would react to us doing this, on any level that shows serious thought or analysis about the question.
 
Last edited:
Don't be so hard on the pakleds, Simon. Its not their fault that the species that was uplifting them got a surprise lesson in Denobulan medical ethics halfway through.
Well played. :D

I have my speculations on what 'happened to' the Pakleds, which I tried to find in a search and apparently never posted before; I'll lay them out later when I have more time but it boils down to 'death by appification.'

Gotta run kthanxbai
 
Speaking of Denobulans... do they exist here? I don't believe they are members of our federation, so I have to ask... Why not? (assuming they exist in this universe).
 
Don't be so hard on the pakleds, Simon. Its not their fault that the species that was uplifting them got a surprise lesson in Denobulan medical ethics halfway through.

Denobulan Medical Ethics is the best Euphemism.

Which is why I used that key word 'almost.' :p

Honestly, calling this level of stupidity "Manticoran Star Empire Simulator" might be an insult to David Weber; the only antagonist he's ever written being this stupid was being actively sabotaged by spies that had comprehensively infiltrated and subverted the top levels of its own government. The People's Republic of Haven and even most of the minor 'third galaxy' opponents at least TRY to be thinking about what the hell they're doing and react to changing situations by perceiving threats and reacting to them... sort of. Usually.

Until such time as we are informed that the Explorer Corps has discovered the Pakleds, I'm going with 'no.' :p :D

Good point.

It is also:
1) Incredibly ill-advised,
2) Profoundly opposed to the spirit of this quest, on such a level that the QM rightly threatened to slap us with Militarization points if the quest-goers as a whole even started seriously considering doing it or wanting to do it,
3) A very effective way to replace a bad problem (Federation conquered by Cardassian overlords) with a worse problem (all life in the galaxy literally being melted down into screaming puddles of agony), and
4) Did I mention how utterly, insanely vicious and evil doing such a foul and nihilistic thing would be? There's a reason there was near-100% opposition in the thread the last time it came up.

So no. Just... no. No 'I was just trying to do this/that.' It was, very simply, a deeply bad idea.On many levels.

I was sort of hoping you'd grown to look back on that suggestion of yours and think "wow, what was I thinking?"

1) We don't know that it's empty. The map is empty, but that doesn't mean nothing is there.
2) You didn't suggest "scouting" it, you suggested flying supply convoys through it and "claiming" it ourselves. That is a much more ambitious operation that we are not remotely equipped to carry out.
3) You still haven't even begun to address the question of how the Cardassians and Sydraxians would react to us doing this, on any level that shows serious thought or analysis about the question.

I'm not talking about the PRH.

Weber got.... bad...
 
Speaking of Denobulans... do they exist here? I don't believe they are members of our federation, so I have to ask... Why not? (assuming they exist in this universe).

I assume sometime in the intervening century they all died out due to the "will of evolution" or some shit. Maybe revenge from the people Phlox genocided.
 
SF Debris references? This must be what coming home feels like! :D

I literally contribute to Chuck's patreon.

It's good stuff. I recommend that anyone who is interested in watching informative and entertaining usmmaries of trek episodes watch it (on phone. Will add link later)
 
Now let's be fair; "will of evolution" has been a thing long before Enterprise. Just look at Threshold and Distant Origin for examples of it.

Okay, so here's the thing.

Star Trek is very soft scifi, we all know that. At the writers' behest, we agree to suspend our disbelief and imagine that this story is set in a universe where telepathy is real and there's a magical lithium metamaterial that lets you FTL.

The problem is that that's not the attitude the writers had in the episodes you listed. There's no indication that they meant the trekverse to have a mystical alternative to evolution by natural selection. The writers literally just don't know how evolution works, but think that they do.

We CAN choose to interpret their incompetence to mean that evolution in trek works by divine magic. But I would rather just ignore it.*


*The exception being the prolificacy of humanoid life, if you interpret Preserver gengineering as working like that.
 
Last edited:
The problem is that that's not the attitude the writers had in the episodes you listed. There's no indication that they meant the trekverse to have a mystical alternative to evolution by natural selection. The writers literally just don't know how evolution works, but think that they do.
To be fair, the idea behind Threshold -- that evolution doesn't always lead to greater intelligence -- isn't necessarily wrong, it's just how Braga approached it that was painful:

"...I think I was trying to make a statement about evolution not necessarily being evolving toward higher organisms, that evolution may also be a de-evolution. You know, we kind of take it for granted that evolution means bigger brains, more technology, you know, more refined civilization. When in fact, for all we know, we're evolving back toward a more primordial state. Ultimately, who can predict?"

However this is poorly communicated in the episode. Also confusing. Breaking warp ten makes Paris turn into his distant descendant who is a weird lizard? I guess that kinda makes sense in that breaking Warp 10 is supposed to make you be everywhere and every time at once, but if evolutionary pressure means the descendants of humans will eventually turn into unintelligent lizards, that suggests the universe gets really bleak.
 
To be fair, the idea behind Threshold -- that evolution doesn't always lead to greater intelligence -- isn't necessarily wrong, it's just how Braga approached it that was painful:



However this is poorly communicated in the episode. Also confusing. Breaking warp ten makes Paris turn into his distant descendant who is a weird lizard? I guess that kinda makes sense in that breaking Warp 10 is supposed to make you be everywhere and every time at once, but if evolutionary pressure means the descendants of humans will eventually turn into unintelligent lizards, that suggests the universe gets really bleak.

He has no idea WHY evolution does things like that, though. In every single Braga episode concerning evolution, there's this assumption that evolution is this independent process with built in goals for each species regardless of selective pressures. His "clarifications" in interviews have only reinforced this, and he doesn't appear to be asserting that Trek evolution is fundamentally different from real life evolution.

He really is just that dumb.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top