- Location
- Mid-Atlantic
The question is, are we seeing every Lecarre spy?Which is how we know the Lecarre are not good spies. We keep knowing about them before they finish.
Or are we seeing one Lecarre spy who gets caught, out of the hundred they actually sent?
What I'm getting at is that such attempts tend to fail if not well grounded in other sciences and technologies. Like trying to build Steam Age spaceships- it's not going to fly, not because the idea "build a spaceship" is somehow invalid, but because the supporting technology isn't there."It'd take centuries" is handwaving by people with no idea how long a thing would actually take. The Licori, for instance, don't have that kind of scientific horizon on anything; their scientists don't live that long. That's the terrifying thing about them, in fact. My point is that the universe has plenty of powerful entities, artifacts, and technologies in it already. If you actually decided to prioritize transcendence, there's no shortage of shortcuts. The only problem with that approach is that it's ridiculously dangerous, to both you and everyone around you.
If we, in this quest, wanted to 'bee-line for godhood', we could nab the Gaeni and the Licori, and convince them to work together with us studying such things as those nasty relics that summon post-physical possessing ghosts, or the old-folks home for the non-transcendent. The reason why we don't do that kind of research is that it's rather likely to backfire in terrible ways. But the attempt could nonetheless be made. It just requires a certain reckless attitude, coupled with a lack of concern over the inevitable consequences.
I can't say for sure what supporting technologies you need. Maybe very advanced psychology. Maybe physics. Maybe biology. Maybe material science because there's a necessary material step between our natural bodies and transcendent bodiless energy beings. Maybe there are fundamental philosophical insights about how to think that matter (cue Traveller ramblings about time, space, and thought).
We could, and most likely do, need any number of things in any number of areas.
And just assuming that this is a thing we could make significant progress on in a generation or two if we tried... That is a very unwarranted assumption.
It's not just "it could be done soon if we didn't care about the consequences." Queen Victoria couldn't have rush-built a moon rocket no matter how reckless she was. Recklessness isn't enough, when you need the broad front of overall science and technology to gradually advance and fill in gaps in your current knowledge.