The fact remains that the UFP is not willing to go to war for Bajor. The fact remains that the Federation can do very little to change Cardassian outlooks and policy.

I still don't like the casual acceptance of people that the litany of crimes committed by the Cardassian occupation of Bajor (work camps, the murder of millions, rapes, torture, political murders, environmental vandalism) and that it will just end on its own and the players can scoop Bajor up afterwards.

I would like to find ways to make things better for TBG's Bajor. I would like to find ways, however small, of changing Cardassian outlooks and policy.

My idea in this case is to make it in the Cardassian interest to maintain a strong puppet government on Bajor - one that means the Cardassians are constrained by SOME sort of rule of law and one that means the Bajoran government is strong enough to pull away from Cardassian dominion when their economy starts to falter. (And once THAT happens, then the Federation can move in with the usual assimilation machine and we can either bring Bajor in as a member or keep them as an ally or keep them as a friendly neutral buffer state.) It would hardly be good, but it would at least be better than what happened to Bajor in the show.

If you have better ideas that don't lead to a war that would kill billions, I am certainly am open to hearing them.

For the record, I am not belittling Nazis, but as far as I am concerned there's no real difference between the two. Sure, Stalin didn't install death camps, but people were sent to Siberia for most trivial of shit, and people were still killed over daring to speak the truth over what the party was doing to both our history and culture, over a period of time that lasted for decades. It's like...you're exchanging one horrible occupation for another horrible occupations. The workings differ, but they ultimately end up with people suffering one way or the other.


I see your point, but I'm also unconvinced that it would work, since I can't see a puppet Bajoran government actually being capable of standing up to Cardassians, or actual constraining them in any real manner. If anything, it will give them greater freedom to move about, "delegating" (so to speak) oppression to their local patsies in same vein as Soviets did in DDR or any other of its Banana states. It would be nice if that wasn't the case, but again, I can't see it happening; given that Cardassians already control the planet. From their point of view there isn't much benefit to allowing an existence of a puppet state, especially in light of Federation's tendencies of assimilating everything in vicinity of their borders...unless they are convinced Bajors will do what they're told, in which case the whole thing goes back to the beginning, it'll just be less obvious. I'm not really sure how we can spin to them in manner that outweighs the benefits they're already getting from control of Bajor.

I admit I'm not really sure how to ultimately avoid a war with Cardassians. Fundamentally they're incredibly paranoid and stubborn, which combined with their zero-sum approach to diplomacy makes them about the worst neighbors. The only way I could see it happening would be if a significant portion of their military went *poof* due to space dragons or something, or if they could be somehow convinced that we make for more beneficial trade partners than enemies - the latter of which isn't likely to happen unless Cardassians get first-hand taste of what that means.
 
Personally, I rather dislike the Bajoran culture.

If we can encourage the Klingons to moderate their behavior toward their slave races or encourage the Romulans to treat their clients better I'd be all for that too.

Getting the neighbours to behave better improves the security of the whole region. Since trust is made easier.

fasquardon
What exactly don't you like? And is it that you don't like pre-Cardassian Bajoran culture, or the Bajoran culture post-Occupation as seen in DS9?
 
Bajor, Bajor, Bajor... fuck it, I don't want to give up Celos or any other part of Orion space. Bajor isn't even on my radar.

Sigh. Maybe I should have voted to have our ships start skirmishing with the Cardassians instead of holing up back at the starbase. I went back and looked at the result of the Apinae Foxtrot, and we were actually ordered to do that. Told by the xeno psychologists that we needed to bloody the Cardassians a little to get them to respect us.
 
Instead we knee jerked a diplomatic push that saw the Cardies accelerate their plans and the occupation starting early.
Eh, some of us - myself included - saw a diplomatic opportunity to pry another minor player out of the Cardassian camp, one we weren't going to see again. So we rolled the dice.

Maybe I should have voted to have our ships start skirmishing with the Cardassians instead of holing up back at the starbase. I went back and looked at the result of the Apinae Foxtrot, and we were actually ordered to do that. Told by the xeno psychologists that we needed to bloody the Cardassians a little to get them to respect us.
On the other hand, we didn't want to seriously stir up trouble until we were better prepared; hindsight is 20/20.
 
I suppose the proper diplomatic attitude towards the Cardassians would be an aggressive one, with an appearance of dominance of superiority, even in the lack of one?

That's what I feel about them, so far, anyhow.

Like, instead of offering concessions for Celos, demand concessions to allow the Cardassians to wash their hands of Celos.
 
If we wind up at war with the Cardassian Union, how do we intend to prosecute such a conflict? What's our endgame for such a war?
Delay until we can bring the cruiser spam into play.

Use aggressive skirmishing and raiding with light forces to strangle their economy in the mean time (Apiata)

Deal with the clients, and maybe swing some.
 
What was that strategy the US used in WW2 for their navy? 'For every ship destroyed, build two more?'
 
Considering how this Orion Civil War has blown up in our faces, the proponents of non-interference may have a point.
Not based on it, they don't. We didn't stick our nose in till the Syndicate started blowing up diplomats. Non-interference is NOT the same as letting acts of war go unanswered.
It's possible that the Cardassian demands might include not ratifying the Apiata or Indorians. That's what I would demand in exchange for letting Celos go unanswered.
Not even remotely on the table. Plus, all we have to do is stall to make it a moot point. They can't really recognize a government that doesn't exist, now can they?
 
What exactly don't you like? And is it that you don't like pre-Cardassian Bajoran culture, or the Bajoran culture post-Occupation as seen in DS9?

Like most Star Trek aliens, they are stereotypes and both pre and post occupation Bajorans are stereotypes of unpleasant (to me at least) dimensions of humanity. I suppose what I really dislike is that they are such flat stereotypes for such a major species in the show. They had the time to introduce far more nuance and complexity, but never did.

Sigh. Maybe I should have voted to have our ships start skirmishing with the Cardassians instead of holing up back at the starbase. I went back and looked at the result of the Apinae Foxtrot, and we were actually ordered to do that. Told by the xeno psychologists that we needed to bloody the Cardassians a little to get them to respect us.

Do we need them to respect us?

I don't think you are wrong, but I also see the counter-argument in favor of playing it safe until we have the power to absolutely crush the Cardies.

I admit I'm not really sure how to ultimately avoid a war with Cardassians.

This may be true.

Almost certainly, avoiding war will require bloodying their nose, but not hard enough that it starts a war.

Delicate balance that.

I see your point, but I'm also unconvinced that it would work

Fair points here.

Like, instead of offering concessions for Celos, demand concessions to allow the Cardassians to wash their hands of Celos.

It would be fun to read those talks.

Considering how this Orion Civil War has blown up in our faces, the proponents of non-interference may have a point.

The Orion Civil War is about what I expected. And considering the Syndicate was doing things that could have set off an interstellar war, I have no regrets.

People who toss around live grenades in the ammunition storage bunker need to be put down hard.

fasquardon
 
Like most Star Trek aliens, they are stereotypes and both pre and post occupation Bajorans are stereotypes of unpleasant (to me at least) dimensions of humanity. I suppose what I really dislike is that they are such flat stereotypes for such a major species in the show. They had the time to introduce far more nuance and complexity, but never did.
They honestly don't seem any flatter than any other species, even with more screen time. I mean, we get a fair bit of screen time for Ferengi, including visits to their homeworld, meeting their head of state, etc., but they don't progress past a certain point. Same with the Cardassians.
Honestly the Bajorans seemed at least decently well-developed, to me. We had ranges of attitudes, stances, goals, motivations, etc. I'm not sure what's so much more unpleasant about the Bajorans compared to the Cardassians or Dominion.
 
Considering how this Orion Civil War has blown up in our faces, the proponents of non-interference may have a point.

In point of fact, the Orion Civil War (frankly, calling it a a civil war is a bit much considering the rebels only have one world and have been more or less beaten back within the span of a few weeks) was more or less within the margin of error for our predictions. We went into this with the understanding that it would be our Space!Iraq, and we got what we expected.
 
Delay until we can bring the cruiser spam into play.
Cruiser spam will take years; I'm not sure the Federation citizenry will put up with that sort of prolonged conflict. It's why we were hoping for a three-year delay before widespread hostilities broke out. Any suggestions on what to do in the meantime?

Use aggressive skirmishing and raiding with light forces to strangle their economy in the mean time (Apiata)
Should we be focusing on freight moving between Cardassian systems, or on smashing space-side infrastructure?

Deal with the clients, and maybe swing some.
The more we can diplomatically isolate an opponent, the better. Is there anything we can afford to offer?
 
What was that strategy the US used in WW2 for their navy? 'For every ship destroyed, build two more?'
I think that was for the 'Liberty ships.' ie the freighters sending materials to Europe.
I know the destroyers were called tin cans, and went by the motto 'live fast, die young, take many with you'

edit: on the liberty ships, there was a history channel thing where one of those freighters went from 'keel laid' to 'sailing' in less than a week. the average time from keel to sailing was closer to a month.
 
Last edited:
Cruiser spam will take years; I'm not sure the Federation citizenry will put up with that sort of prolonged conflict. It's why we were hoping for a three-year delay before widespread hostilities broke out. Any suggestions on what to do in the meantime?
Honestly I would form up the Explorer Corps and send them a-raiding behind Cardassian lines, with the goal of hitting their shipyards to ensure we do long-term damage to their ability to act against other races if we're forced to sue for peace. To defend themselves against 5 explorers of varying degrees of experience the Cardassians would essentially be forced to go on the defensive which would minimize the risk of costly attacks on our own people, and let our Hawkier members act with near-impunity.

We should keep in mind that any victory on our part will only radicalize them, though. No such thing as a good war...
 
Last edited:
If I recall correctly, one of the major problems of the Cardassia - and the drive behind its expansion - was the crippling need of raw materials. Pretty sure that was one of the reasons behind them strip mining everything.

Granted, I'm not sure how much of this applies to TBG-verse, but Cardassia's random expansionism and resource tributes it seems to extract roughly match same objectives. I imagine a concentrated effort to either sever their trade or destroy their colonial base would probably set them back severely. Even if Cardassia isn't in same situation as in canon, destroying their industrial base still works to our advantage, given our better developed industries and larger resource pool.

It would also hopefully invite their fleet to spread out more, unless Cardassians are willing to endure industrial losses in favor of maintaining concentration of force.

The more we can diplomatically isolate an opponent, the better. Is there anything we can afford to offer?

I think we've been doing pretty well on that point; what with Apiata and Indorrians. Most of Cardassian clients that remain - or rather, we know about - seem pretty firmly in their pocket. Admittedly, we can probably keep the Dawiar out; Sydraxians remain a big maybe, but they seem pretty intent on perpetrating bad blood with us - unless they either accept our diplomatic overtures or we find a definitive proof of Cardassian involvement with our initial diplomatic efforts, they'll probably stay on Cardassian side.

As far as diplomacy in general goes, the Federation can realistically offer much more beneficial bargain than being a client of Cardassians; but the problem remains that either we're just not believed on that account, or people doubt whether Federation will be able to marshal itself in case of decisive conflict. The size and peaceful overtures of the federation aren't as appealing when Cardassian fleet is much, much more closer to you.
 
... You know A part of me is worried that Cardassians are going to come in here and offer us a chance to make peace with the Syndicate. It would be complete bullshit, we would know it and they would know it, but they still would be presenting us a potential lose lose situation. Either we abandon our attack on the Syndicate, or they gain a narrative that they use to show everyone that we are in fact not the peace loving government we claim to be. It would explain why they have members of the Other Federation on board to act as wittiness.
 
offer us a chance to make peace with the Syndicate.
At which point our diplomats point out that at no point has the Federation ever been at war with a nation-state called "The Syndicate". We have been aiding the democratically elected Orion government in law enforcement operations regarding a violent criminal organization of the same name however.

There is a reason people were against the suggestions to declare "war" on the Syndicate. It would have provided them recognition as a valid nation-state when legally speaking all they are right now is a particularly well armed gang.
 
At which point our diplomats point out that at no point has the Federation ever been at war with a nation-state called "The Syndicate". We have been aiding the democratically elected Orion government in law enforcement operations regarding a violent criminal organization of the same name however.

There is a reason people were against the suggestions to declare "war" on the Syndicate. It would have provided them recognition as a valid nation-state when legally speaking all they are right now is a particularly well armed gang.
I know that and you know that hell I even imagine the Cardies know that but if they spin it correctly they still have a dangerous tool they can us against both as propaganda and a tool on the negotiating table.
 
How precise are we talking here? Just curious.
There are rumors that one Syndicate mid-ranker surrendered after T'Lorel gave her an unfashionable Vulcanesque haircut. From orbit.

Her words were "message received and understood." :D

I think the only way the Federation can accept Celosi independence is if the Syndicate basically accepts that it has to stop being the Syndicate and become a cross between a normal hypercorp and a political fraternity. That is to say, no slavery, no smuggling, no terrorism etc.

Allowing the Syndicate to win Celos without selling its soul to the UFP is, I think, more expensive in life and liberty (in the long run) than orbital bombardment.

That said, allowing some Syndicate cells to "sell their soul to the UFP". allowing some of the Syndicate to "go legitimate", rather than grinding them all down to dust and bloody paste may also be a good strategy for ending the Syndicate as as threat quickly and effectively.
The big problem is that we have basically no way to "de-Syndicate" the legitimate organizations, other than maybe having them vetted one at a time by a telepath. We risk fighting the war all over again in twenty years, if we aren't careful.

Letting Syndicate cells surrender peacefully is a great idea- the catch is that we can't let them go on being a "not-Syndicate" organization.

One of my real worries with the anti-Syndicate war is basically feeding an Orion civil war when the Federation isn't willing to fight the civil war to the end. I think at this point, we're now seeing a highly political civil war unfolding among the Orions now. Offering another route for Orion conservatives could be one way of avoiding such a civil war spreading to Alukk, at least.

fasquardon
All our actual Orion characters predicted this would become a civil war.

Honestly, i think we're going to have to provide an out for Orion 'conservatives' that ISN'T the Syndicate. To signal to the very powerful corporations and the transorionist factions that no, lining up with the Syndicate is not a good idea, it protects them, not you. But for the Syndicate itself, the only message we can really afford to send is "surrender, and find something else to do."

I wok up two hours ago and tossed and turned in bed, resisting the urge to run downstairs at 5 and 6 AM to check this site.
I KNOW, RIGHT?

It's not even that unjustified, if you live in the Americas; a lot of the interesting posts to this thread happen in the morning.

If the Federation recognizes Celos' independence, we're launching a fucking coup.
What who wait what?

A thought on Bajor:

People seem to have given up on Bajor and said "welp, the occupation will go as badly as it did on the TV show, will end, and we'll come in and sweep up the pieces".

Well, what if it doesn't go like it did on the show? What if the occupation were better? Or worse?

It occurs to me that one of the opportunities we have in the Celos crisis is an opportunity to get the Cardassians to agree to standards for treating clients which might greatly stabilize the Cardassian-Federation borderzone. However, almost certainly the cost will be to strengthen the Cardassian position on Bajor.

That may not be an entirely bad thing if we can make it so that the Cardassians have some buy-in to accord Bajorans with some modicum of respect and allow them a decent degree of autonomy. To make the occupation of Bajor more like the experience Poland had as a Soviet "ally" rather than as a Nazi occupied region.

fasquardon
Do you think we can trust the Cardassians to keep any promises they make regarding the status of Bajor? I'm quite sure they've made promises to the Bajorans, and I'm equally sure some or all of those promises haven't been kept. And we're only about two years into the occupation.
 
Do you think we can trust the Cardassians to keep any promises they make regarding the status of Bajor? I'm quite sure they've made promises to the Bajorans, and I'm equally sure some or all of those promises haven't been kept. And we're only about two years into the occupation.

If we can ensure that their other client species also see those promises and provide them updates on the Bajorans at regular intervals? Yes. The timeline here is different in that the Cardassians are propping up a client government, they're not invaders. If their other clients see them breaking promises to their puppets and engaging in acts of genocide against them, the Federation will start to look a lot more tempting...
 
Back
Top