- Location
- USA
Krabad would by my choice for officer exchange, that gets a Rigellans into the EC panel in a few years
8 Enlisted a year? I mean, it makes sense, but wow!Seems like the Apiata accession will alleviate our long term enlisted shortage quite a lot.
I might remember incorrectly, but don't the Turtleships have pretty high D, which also counts as the 'speed' stat now?As for Rigel, I'm willing to be talked around on that vote, but when I see their potential usage described as "using the strong science and speed of their escorts to police against raiders".... well, I don't exactly think of "speed" when I think of Rigellian ships.
It is 30 pp for amending anti syndicate legislation, still that would also mean we could not do anything but the Ambassador and legislation as those cost 64pp combined and we would only have 68We really, really can't afford those 10pp. Right now we have 78pp. The Syndicate legislation amendment the majority wanted for this year costs 50pp, the Ambassador project a majority also wanted for this year costs 34pp. With another quarter until the snakepit it's reasonably likely we will just barely be able to afford both, and possibly an additional minor item, but if we spend 10pp now we very likely will have to drop at least one of those. Do you really consider the officer exchange more important than both of those items (no way to tell which one would win if we are forced to pick between the two, so preferring the exchange to just one of them is not enough)?
Only if we also take the option to acquire more influence (20 pp) with the option to amend the legislation (30pp). Was that the plan? Because I seem to remember us already picking the first one last year.We really, really can't afford those 10pp. Right now we have 78pp. The Syndicate legislation amendment the majority wanted for this year costs 50pp, the Ambassador project a majority also wanted for this year costs 34pp. With another quarter until the snakepit it's reasonably likely we will just barely be able to afford both, and possibly an additional minor item, but if we spend 10pp now we very likely will have to drop at least one of those. Do you really consider the officer exchange more important than both of those items (no way to tell which one would win if we are forced to pick between the two, so preferring the exchange to just one of them is not enough)?
We really, really can't afford those 10pp. Right now we have 78pp. The Syndicate legislation amendment the majority wanted for this year costs 50pp, the Ambassador project a majority also wanted for this year costs 34pp. With another quarter until the snakepit it's reasonably likely we will just barely be able to afford both, and possibly an additional minor item, but if we spend 10pp now we very likely will have to drop at least one of those. Do you really consider the officer exchange more important than both of those items (no way to tell which one would win if we are forced to pick between the two, so preferring the exchange to just one of them is not enough)?
We really, really can't afford those 10pp. Right now we have 78pp. The Syndicate legislation amendment the majority wanted for this year costs 50pp, the Ambassador project a majority also wanted for this year costs 34pp. With another quarter until the snakepit it's reasonably likely we will just barely be able to afford both, and possibly an additional minor item, but if we spend 10pp now we very likely will have to drop at least one of those. Do you really consider the officer exchange more important than both of those items (no way to tell which one would win if we are forced to pick between the two, so preferring the exchange to just one of them is not enough)?
I don't think the +25 relations with the Honiani from that option is going to make the difference to be honest. Actually, I personally can't imagine the Honiani joining us in this war unless we somehow manage to reach something like 300+ with them.I think it is, actually. Getting the Honiani on our side quickly would give us a powerful ally that can hit the Sydraxians from their coreward flank if shit hits the fan. 10 PP is steep, but if Zang does a good job it could save us a lot of trouble within the coming year.
And, well, its possible we won't be able to afford both the Ambassador and Syndicate projects this quarter even with those ten pp.
I don't think the +25 relations with the Honiani from that option is going to make the difference to be honest. Actually, I personally can't imagine the Honiani joining us in this war unless we somehow manage to reach something like 300+ with them.
They already are our affiliates, so the +25 relations is just one decent yearly roll, or 1/4 of a diplomatic push.I think it is, actually. Getting the Honiani on our side quickly would give us a powerful ally that can hit the Sydraxians from their coreward flank if shit hits the fan. 10 PP is steep, but if Zang does a good job it could save us a lot of trouble within the coming year.
It's 30pp for the amendment itself, 20pp to get influence to spend on it.It is 30 pp for amending anti syndicate legislation, still that would also mean we could not do anything but the Ambassador and legislation as those cost 64pp combined and we would only have 68
It's possible, and would still be somewhat possible with the 10pp spent, we gained 40pp in a single quarter before, but it would be a heck of a lot less likely. Even if it doesn't end up making a difference for those particular two issues we will still be able to spend the pp on something useful, perhaps a starbase in the Gabriel Expanse.It's more like I've given up on the Amending the Syndicate legislation or indeed anything else other than starting the Ambassador. Don't forget, we also owe the Pacifists use of 15pp!
So we have 78 -15 = 63pp right now. Are we really going to get another 21 pp in one quarter of Captain's Logs? I doubt it. But, eh, you're probably right that there are more productive thing
That would delay those benefits for another year, with no useful research finishing during the extra year. Delaying the project would also be a significant headache and require either leaving UP idle for a year or making them drop a filler project next year, and full teams dropping projects is something we have been avoiding and may not even be allowed at all anymore (without costing another 5pp).I'd be willing to delay the Ambassador production to next year, largely because the overall benefits from it don't even start until in like, 7, 8 years, when the prototype finishes?
We spent the 20pp last year.It's 30pp for the amendment itself, 20pp to get influence to spend on it.
[X][COUNCIL] Base Plan Bank Anti-Syndicate Influence for Next Year, Apiata, Sydraxians, Crew
...-[X] Acquire new Influence to spend on Anti-Syndicate Legislation, 20pp/5 (Can only be taken once)
If that were the case, it would be an option that gives us nothing but advantages without any cost if taken. It wouldn't make any sense for Oneiros to give an option like that.Come to think of it, shouldn't the Honiani exchange be something that gives us pp, a la the Stargazer?
And the idea was to spend another 20pp this year for more to make it worthwhile opening up the legislation in the first place.
I thought it was to split the 50pp cost over two years; five influence is not nothing.And the idea was to spend another 20pp this year to make it worthwhile opening up the legislation in the first place.
I don't think it makes much sense to make the mechanical downside of what realistically should be a no-brainer (who would turn down an officer exchange in a situation like this?) severe enough to make it a no-brainer in the opposite direction mechanically, though. If it has to have a mechanical downside it should be 1-2pp or something like that. Or offer two different ways in which the officer exchange (or a mutually exclusive related action) could happen with different mechanical effects.If that were the case, it would be an option that gives us nothing but advantages without any cost if taken. It wouldn't make any sense for Oneiros to give an option like that.
I don't think it makes much sense to make the mechanical downside of what realistically should be a no-brainer (who would turn down an officer exchange in a situation like this?) severe enough to make it a no-brainer in the opposite direction mechanically, though. If it has to have a mechanical downside it should be 1-2pp or something like that. Or offer two different ways in which the officer exchange (or a mutually exclusive related action) could happen with different mechanical effects.
Incomes
Andor - 50 - 40 - 1.2 - 2 - 2
Vulcan - 35 - 30 - 1 - 1.75 - 1.5
Tellarites - 90 - 45 - 1.25 - 1.75 - 1.75
Humans - 100 - 50 - 1.8 - 2 - 2
Amarki - 90 - 65 - 2 - 2.5 - 1.5
Betazoids - 30 - 30 - 1.15 - 1.45 - 1.15
Caitian - 80 - 80 - 2.2 - 2.2 - 0.8
Rigel - 80 - 40 - 1.5 - 4 - 3.5
Incomes
Andor - 60 - 45 - 1.2 - 2 - 2
Vulcan - 40 - 35 - 1 - 1.75 - 1.5
Tellarites - 95 - 50 - 1.25 - 1.75 - 1.75
Humans - 110 - 60 - 1.8 - 2 - 2
Amarki - 145 - 115 - 3 - 5.5 - 3.5
Betazoids - 30 - 30 - 1.15 - 1.45 - 1.15
Caitian - 80 - 80 - 2.2 - 2.2 - 0.8
Rigel - 80 - 50 - 1.75 - 4.25 - 3.75
Apiata - 125 - 105 - 0.5 - 8 - 3
Indoria - 60 - 45 - 1.25 - 2 - 1.25
Rigel - 80 - 50 - 1.75 - 4.25 - 3.75
Apiata - 125 - 105 - 0.5 - 8 - 3
To help keep their Hebrinda-class cruisers competitive over a decade on from their design-date, the Amarkians have begun a refit program. Castellans have used the MWCO to approach the Ship Design Bureau and Starfleet Tactical Command for consultation on what the best approach would be.
[ ][AMARKI] Fleet Workhorse - +1 S, +1 P, +1 D, 30br/20sr (Final figure C4 S3 H3 L4 P4 D4 - 100br/100sr)
[ ][AMARKI] Fleet Strike Force - +1 C, +1 L, +1 D, 30br/20sr (Final figure C5 S2 H3 L5 P3 D4 - 100br/100sr)
[ ][RIGEL] As effective defensive pickets, using the strong science and speed of their escorts to police against raiders
The Andorian Guard has a surplus of trained starfaring personnel and are interested in seeing if Starfleet would be willing to transfer the registration of one of the Constellation-class cruisers to them. They would be able to offer 25br and 25sr by way of compensation. This would free the crew of those vessels to return to the available Starfleet pool.
[ ][ANDOR] Agree
[ ][ANDOR] Deny
And the idea was to spend another 20pp this year for more to make it worthwhile opening up the legislation in the first place.
Not if we want to ammend the anti syndicate legislation and start the Ambassador. Those cost 64, and we have 15 promised to the pacifists which is 79 and we are at 78 pp currently