Starfleet Design Bureau

[X] Arrowhead Hull

Even our fast ships aren't really that fast right now, so I'd like to reduce complexity so we can make more of them. If we've got more on patrol they should each have to cover a smaller area in which they can respond faster than if they had to travel a further distance.
 
the warp field itself will passively guide interstellar dust around the ship. It's only when incoming velocities and mass exceed the innate deflection force of the warp shell that a deflector becomes necessary.

Is this statement supported by explicit statements from the game master?
We know that the NX series from the TV show have deflector dishes. So presumably between Warp 3 and Warp 5 the velocity of incoming mass exceeds the field's ability to natively deflect particles. Which would restrict the Arrowhead to somewhere below the Warp 5 of the next generation of warp engines.
 
Other than just wanting a different aesthetic, there is no reason to vote for Arrowhead.
Plenty of reason, for one Half Saucer uses a lot more industry per ship which means we are going to have fewer ships if we go that route and since we are building up starfleet, having enough hulls to actually be out patrolling and in position to intercept is important.
 
Is this statement supported by explicit statements from the game master?

It isn't. Lots of species don't use deflectors at all. I'm not sure why, given how vital they seem to be to Starfleet ships, but maybe they just rely on brute force or low-level shielding at all times to just tank micrometeoroids and whatnot. Exterior nacelles and deflectors might just seem like military vulnerabilities to other species.
 
Last edited:
Well, if our design paradigm can't handle debris at FTL speeds higher than warp 3, and we're looking to retrofit in the future once we get warp 5... As costly as it'll be, and lowering the ease of manufacture...

[X] Half-Saucer Hull
 
Plenty of reason, for one Half Saucer uses a lot more industry per ship which means we are going to have fewer ships if we go that route and since we are building up starfleet, having enough hulls to actually be out patrolling and in position to intercept is important.
Half saucer is also stated to be faster and more heavily armed. So it will make a better commerce protection cruiser once we can retrofit them to Warp 5 engines.
 
It isn't. Lots of species don't use deflectors at all. I'm not sure why, given how vital they seem to be to Starfleet ships, but maybe they just rely on brute force or low-level shielding at all times to just tank micrometeoroids and whatnot. Exterior nacelles and deflectors might just seem like military vulnerabilities to other species.
So, if we went arrowhead, would it eventually be possible for us to develop something besides deflector dishes, or are we still on track for that?
 
So, if we went arrowhead, would it eventually be possible for us to develop something besides deflector dishes, or are we still on track for that?
Found an decent answer about other species use of deflector dishes on Stack Exchange.


"According to the Klingon Bird-of-Prey Owner's Manual, deflection (per se) is essential for interstellar flight, but deflector dishes are merely one set of technology that can be used for that purpose. Some Klingon vessels have large, visible deflectors and others store them entirely in the wings and main body of the vessel"
 
Last edited:
Found an answer about other species use of deflector dishes on Stack Exchange.


"According to the Klingon Bird-of-Prey Owner's Manual, deflection (per se) is essential for interstellar flight, but deflector dishes are merely one set of technology that can be used for that purpose. Some Klingon vessels have large, visible deflectors and others store them entirely in the wings and main body of the vessel"
Hm, maybe Starfleet prefers exterior deflector dishes for ease of repair/replacement? Or maybe for easier manufacturing reasons at-scale, where you don't need unique parts for a specific class of ship, but rather a general type of equipment that everything uses.
 
Back
Top