No, Japan famously had dogshit AA even for an axis power, between fire control and the actual guns themselves. Only Germany was worse and that's because they calibrated their fire control for modern planes on a fucking lake, not the sea they actually were going to fight on, iirc.To be fair, they did actually have decent AA/fire control for their era. Not as good as the US's, sure, but the US had arguably the best in the world, so no shame there.
To be unfair, the Yamato shot more of her allies with said AA/fire control than she did enemies.
I absolutely love this little touch. Love it so much.Being in the best condition, the von Sachs was saved as a non-interactive historical exhibit until it was donated to a Risian resort in 2374 and the interior stripped and modified into, appropriately, a starship-sized arboretum.
Agreed.size isn't where we should be making cuts; size is cheap, and it's utility as well as defenses, and it might let us mount cheaper standard tubes rather than rapids.
Max cruise is still capped at Warp 7 till we get the new nacelles, hopefully for the next design. Efficient cruise increases are still useful, though.It'd have to push our max cruise upto 7.5+ for me to consider voting for it though.
I'm generally opposed to outright hospital ship designs as well. That said, I'm not generally opposed to smaller advanced medical facilities in at least one ship in service at any given time (roughly every third or fourth design?). We don't need the bed count of a proper hospital ship (and shouldn't try for it; they're heinously inefficient), but it's good to have something capable of responding to the really weird stuff and developing and synthesizing cures for it.Can I just say how little I want to make this a hospital ship.
I am actively against making this a hospital ship.
I don't understand the desire to try to make everything a hospital ship, and I think it would just ensure we build even less of these.
Look at it this way, if we go for a maximum[X] 180 Meter, 3 Decks (Mass: 114kt) [Cost: 22.5]
I voted for standard shields because I wanted to improve the ship's defenses through bulking up. Losing that vote on shields isn't going to deter me; I'm just going to be wincing throughout the rest of the design process.
Aren't they just building the canon Miranda?Look at it this way, if we go for a maximumbattleshipheavy cruiser and SanFran decides not to be a bunch of corner cutting shits we might skew Starfleet's budget department on what a normal ship should cost going forward.
As a metaphorical successor to her Nelson would also work.
I figured it be flavored from all the stuff we been doing so it be different from canon miranda.
Still another vote on the saucer to decide if we make her even thicker
Not necessarily, we are assuming based on past actions they'll just produce a ship comparable to canon. But given the lessons of this war it's reasonably probable they actually go for a more than barebones design.
We spent a lot of effort on Econ ships. We definitely have the leeway to spend a whole lot on our ship of the line.Look at it this way, if we go for a maximumbattleshipheavy cruiser and SanFran decides not to be a bunch of corner cutting shits we might skew Starfleet's budget department on what a normal ship should cost going forward.
Excalibur ended up 7 or 9 decks from a baseline of 2, should logic hold we should get 10.5/11 to 13.5/14 - either the same as the Excelsior class or slightly thicker.Still another vote on the saucer to decide if we make her even thicker![]()
The main shuttlebay of a Galaxy-class starship is about the same diameter (and perhaps volume) as the saucer of a refit Constitution-class.
Where's all the Shuttles, Lebowski?The main shuttlebay of a Galaxy-class starship is about the same diameter (and perhaps volume) as the saucer of a refit Constitution-class.
so your saying its possible?The main shuttlebay of a Galaxy-class starship is about the same diameter (and perhaps volume) as the saucer of a refit Constitution-class.