Yeah. I know exactly how that feels. And I'm going to become familiar with it again when the Discord goes away and those discussions go back to being PM conversations that I'm not part of.

Either people are allowed to talk about stuff in places other than this thread or not. And we need to work out exactly what Ugolino's status is. He was banned for being disruptive and angry, not (theoretically) because his ideas themselves aren't welcome, and you need to step up (and work out a deal with the rest of the staff if need be) and make a firm decision one way or the other about whether other people are allowed to act as a filter and relay his ideas to the thread. Either he's an unperson or he just needs a buffer, none of this both ways crap. Remember, someone complaining about people talking to Ugo was what started this most recent blow-up.

While obviously I cannot prevent people from sending private messages to each other, as one of the original members of the main PMAS PM (and the one who suggested that it be ironically named "The Cabal"), I hereby make a commitment to copy any discussion that occurs there to the thread - a task made much simpler with the new "Copy To Thread" tool.

Furthermore, I should note that even after Ugolino was banned, the PM never had all that much discussion - certainly not compared to the thread. In almost an entire year of existence, it spans only 72 pages. Having been active in both, the PM's scale is miniscule compared to Discord.
 
Last edited:
This sounds like it would get complicated rather quickly though, doesn't it?

Aye. The most we could probably handle is something like the Unknown Armies Madness Meters. 5 or less of meters like these. Any ideas for others?


Empress Sabrina | Idealist Sabrina
<---------------------------------------------------------->

Transhumanist/Singulitarian Sci-Fi | Urban Fantasy
<---------------------------------------------------------->

Worm|Nanoha
<---------------------------------------------------------->
 
Last edited:
Yeah. I know exactly how that feels. And I'm going to become familiar with it again when the Discord goes away and those discussions go back to being PM conversations that I'm not part of.

Well we have the issue that we have, in thread, pages and page of vote editing that like Aura said makes people's eyes glaze over. The other issue is that the specificity of a votes allows for more division. I can understand debates on means and intent but sometimes I think we get debates on wording... but generally the issue is the giant votes force people away. We get this grudge matches with the same handful of people since those are the only people taking the floor because they are the ones with the time and ability to make the votes.

though i think massive debates on any of the bombs is going to always occur - Firn made us care too much about the characters to do any of that stuff lightly.

Moratoriums on voting after story posts are put up could help (maybe) by allowing people to stop and discuss the situation rather then race for getting a vote up first and thus get the bandwagon.
 
Man, first time in a long long time since the last time I posted here but...

All discussion must happen somewhere where all members can see and discuss it, or this divide will only get worse.

That's a wishful thinking. Noble, but still a wishful thinking. As long as there are strong, different opinions and approaches to where should the quest go, and to the point of jumping at the throat of those who disagree, there will always be little groups discussing a vote to present to the thread. Solve this excessivily toxic attitude towards discordant voices, and what you want in this particular quote will become possible.

Is just that simple.
 
Please do not. Shut down the PMAS text channel specifically if you need, but the discord server as a whole covers more than just PMAS nowadays. On top of that I have important things on that discord that aren't anywhere else, and the general chat serves an important role for my general social interaction when I just want to talk to people in real-ish time without the giant fuckstorms that are the votes and vote discussions and the reason I haven't bothered coming into the thread proper in literal months.
I agree; please don't shut down the server entirely @Firnagzen.

I've been one of the biggest Chicken Littles on this thread about the Discord server, and mostly because I saw the problem of backroom deals and opaque votes coming because it destroyed a writing community I was in 15 years ago in exactly the same way. That said, chat communities like that are precious to the people who are a part of them, and should be treasured for the beautiful communities they are.

There just needs to be a zero tolerance policy about discussing votes, and it has to be rigorously upheld by everyone there. Yes, unfortunately this means Ugo needs to butt out unless he can convince the mods to un-ban him. Yes, this is going to be hard for everyone to remember and enforce. But, as a person who's only been on the Discord server once, even I can see it is a great little community, and deserves to thrive.

Just, you know, keep to the rules. For the good of everyone.
 
Like, I want to make one thing clear: I could not give less of a shit about the drama queen bullshit that's been happening in the thread and that I have been actively ignoring, but I will be very annoyed if it ends up fucking with my hangout where I chill with friends. You mentioned people being driven off? Me. Here. Now. Vote discussion is so goddamn caustic and opaque that it's more effort to try and participate in than it's worth. I'd rather debate morality with Sereg.

My advice to fix that, if it even can be fixed, is either do away with write-ins entirely or limit them sharply. Maybe a character limit. Supply us with normal vote options again rather then ending everything with "what do?" and maybe, maybe visiting the thread will stop feeling like visiting a goddamn warzone.
 
I look forward to the changes this will hopefully make. As other's have said, I pretty much only come by for story posts, because I can't be arsed to sort through 20 pages of votewalls.
 
I feel kind of bad coming in here with my first post in a while being mean to someone who feels passionate about things. It makes it feel like it's a bit hard to say what I want to say. So I'm apologizing again for that.
I should also throw out that, for me and a few others, we've kind of become reliant on the real-time nature of the Discord server to get summaries of what's going on in PMAS because for something like 11 pages it can just be unreadable block text essays of overly edited voting wars.
If you have to get brought up to date by other people rather than reading the quest thread itself then things are already fucked.
The thread, and the nature of this Quest, results in people racing to push their agenda over others. Everyone has a laundry list of things they want to do, and if I'm honest, I encourage that.
I think you need to not. It encourages bloat and this story makes Papa Nurgle proud with its protruding, swollen stomach and lethargic pacing. But more than that it makes everything an argument.

When you can vote to do anything and stuff votes full of whatever you want it turns every vote into a spideweb of votes. The rhetorical knives come out over anything and everything, because all things are important. It is, to my mind, the river from which most every problem flows. The way votes work creates a shopping-cart climate where it becomes about What Can You Get Done When You Can Do Anything, And Oh Fuck That Guy By The Way He Keeps Not Agreeing. It makes the people you're voting with folks that you don't trust. It lowers your opinions of your fellow players and makes you act snidely and think of them as bad people.

And let's not pretend that doesn't happen, because it does. I followed PMAS for almost two years and constantly monitored on-site and off-site discussion of it. I talk to people about it. It happens. It still happens. People have ill will toward each other and that colors the conversation. It makes things nasty and unpleasant. Nobody wants that, you know?

While we're also talking hard truths here, it's got to be said: this thread's 4.5k pages is full of people being assholes to each other. People being petty and uncharitable and sniping and distrusting. It keeps cropping up as the faces change, which suggests to me, again, that the problem is in part overhead and requires structural changing. I would know. I've posted lots of histronic, salty things in this thread that I'm not proud of and that I'd apologize for if it hasn't been so long. It's part of why I stopped voting: I had no patience for anything, and that made me act like someone I didn't want to.

Ultimately I guess I want to end it on this. Passion is important. The attachment people have to PMAS is a wonderful thing if kept in healthy bounds. It's the fuel to Firn's engine, which in turn drives this quest. But if that fuel is bad, then everything else will get stuck. Luckily for all the regulars, you can change what you want.

If you want people to be less nasty, be less nasty yourself, and try to forgive other people their shortcomings. Kindness begets kindness.

PMAS - Sabrina - begins and ends with you.
 
I'm gonna be honest, I can't even keep up with this thread without the Discord. I can't say I honestly look forward to having to talk about things here instead of there, I'll in all likelyhood end up just watching the Story-Only all the time again. Discussion here is and has been since well before the Discord long and tedious and toxic and fractuous, it's like a democratic legislature with less civility and more partisanship.
 
I would perhaps like a bit more direction with the votes, if just to maintain perspective on occasion.

This quest is extremely (if virtually) free form in terms of the options available to Sabrina but at the same time, it feels like 99% of the quest is more or less going over a check list of things to do and writing off what's currently being prioritized at the time. This results in the plot feeling very nebulous. I know there are things happening in the background, but it does feel like Sabrina is driving everything while everyone else is kinda... well, idle?
 
Should I limit vote options for write-ins, should I start offering vote options again?

YES, YES, a thousand times YES!!!!

There is nothing that discourages participation in a quest more than having completely open-ended write-ins. It means that only people who feel like they are completely on top of every little thing in the quest dare to participate. Vote options are the best. Vote options are great. Vote options mean that the more casual vote participant can choose the option that seems best to them, confident that it's at least a somewhat reasonable pick.

Vote options demonstrate that the PC is an actual character with pre-existing traits that can't easily be altered by the whims of the voters. Vote options demonstrate that the QM has a plan for where things are going and is offering voters the chance to pick the path, not requiring them to plan from scratch. All praise to vote options!
 
I am still bewildered at the fact that we had an entire thread for the Mami metabomb vote.

Here's my radical opinion: If a vote becomes too contested by the playerbase, then take that vote away from the player base. I don't mean collective punishment by forcing the characters to make bad desicions or have bad things happen to them, but I do mean that maybe the author should railroad and do what they want, if the playerbase is being intractable.
 
Aye. The most we could probably handle is something like the Unknown Armies Madness Meters. 5 or less of meters like these. Any ideas for others?


Empress Sabrina | Idealist Sabrina
<---------------------------------------------------------->

Transhumanist/Singulitarian Sci-Fi | Urban Fantasy
<---------------------------------------------------------->

Worm|Nanoha
<---------------------------------------------------------->
I'm kind of cracking up at that last one, because I'm pretty sure the debate will always be between

Worm|Nanoha
<----------------------------------------------------------|>
and
Worm|Nanoha
<---------------------------------------------------------->-|

:D
 
On the voting options.

So I think the extreme freeform nature of the vote is useful. But I think that, if Firn is willing for some more overhead, the thread could use options put into the the bottom of the vote along with the [Write In] option. The options could reflect the GM's thoughts on how Sabrina thinks she could act given the current situation and voting trends and also, importantly, could restate plans already in motion.

Basically the pre-built vote options represent Sabrina instinctual/natural responses vs the wider thread reflecting her plotting (and general emotional state I suppose...) as well as acting her memory and prioritization.
 
@Firnagzen One other way in which the pacing might be contributing to the problem...

Like, Sabrina's awake for, presumably, around sixteen hours each day. There should be plenty of room to get a bunch of stuff done on a wide variety of priorities. But since a day stretches out to months and months, most of which is dedicated to probably only a few hours of that day with the rest being summarized, it feels like the stuff that's not in the updates doesn't get done (especially since for example Science ideas don't get made unless we directly vote for them, and we're going to start needing to do "science" that's a lot harder to imagine than a laser, that needs to be more on Sabrina-in-universe than us to conceptualize.)
 
Basically the pre-built vote options represent Sabrina instinctual/natural responses vs the wider thread reflecting her plotting (and general emotional state I suppose...) as well as acting her memory and prioritization.
It would also help factor in some of the non-textual parts of the recent sections. For instance, it never occurred to me that Madoka was as upset as Onmur and the Discord crowd noticed, and I still didn't think it was quite as important until a bunch of people started quoting the one line her reaction was on, and then Firn showed the picture...

I mean, that was kind of an easy line to miss. I still maintain that it can wait until after the meeting, but at this point I can at least understand why so many people are thinking it can't. Putting something like "[] Priority Interrupt! Madoka is making the horror face!" into the voting options would serve to highlight that for those of us who happened to fail reading comprehension that day.
 
For instance, it never occurred to me that Madoka was as upset as Onmur and the Discord crowd noticed, and I still didn't think it was quite as important until a bunch of people started quoting the one line her reaction was on, and then Firn showed the picture...
And if people aren't allowed to casually discuss the update with one another, maybe it wouldn't have occurred to anyone.

Your instinctive reaction to a mechanism allowing us to note and respond to that sort of thing was to want to destroy it. And here we are.
 
Last edited:
It would also help factor in some of the non-textual parts of the recent sections. For instance, it never occurred to me that Madoka was as upset as Onmur and the Discord crowd noticed, and I still didn't think it was quite as important until a bunch of people started quoting the one line her reaction was on, and then Firn showed the picture...

I mean, that was kind of an easy line to miss. I still maintain that it can wait until after the meeting, but at this point I can at least understand why so many people are thinking it can't. Putting something like "[] Priority Interrupt! Madoka is making the horror face!" into the voting options would serve to highlight that for those of us who happened to fail reading comprehension that day.

also in combat and social situation the voting options can reflect Sabrina's first ideas for responses. Basically giving us the IC view of Sabrina and her combat exp, sense of the characters so forth.
 
RE Pacing: It's probably because Persona 5 has put my brain into a near-vegetative state this holy week holiday... but like in Persona, maybe divide a day into strict timeslots to do stuff?

Maybe 4 slots: Morning, Afternoon, After School, Evening. And each would take 2-4 votes, with the firat being 'wat do', the next being 'stuff happens, how react in general'?

And it doesn't matter if said action took up thitry minutes or three hours, once the action for that timeslot's done, it's done, scene moves on to the next slot. Actions might even take more slots (ie. Sendai campaign), but never less.

I suggest this because, IMO, the thread has a tendency to do as much shit as possible within a single day (see: nitpicking how many minutes Sabrina spaces out for every grief experiment), which just murders the pacing of the quest.

And this is before this suggestion gets runover by the Mac Truck named 'Timestop'. For that, I think we sorta already have a check for that: Timestop fatigue.

Might expand on this later, but I gotta stop before I pop a vein phonetyping.
 
And if people aren't allowed to casually discuss the update with one another, maybe it wouldn't have occurred to anyone.

Or perhaps if the discussion wasn't split, people could have shared their reasoning more clearly instead of descending into a morass of insults about the "other side". (Which happened both here and on the Discord.)

That said, the ideal solution is to restore the thread to an atmosphere conducive to casual discussion.
 
Last edited:
Or perhaps if the discussion wasn't split, people could have shared their reasoning more clearly instead of descending into a morass of insults about the "other side".(Which happened both here and on the Discord.)
The thread was just as bad before Discord as after, so as little activity as you say those PMs had, they were clearly enough.

That said, the ideal solution is to restore the thread to an atmosphere conducive to casual discussion.

A forum post is inherently more of a writing commitment than a one-line-at-a-time chat environment. It will never be as casual.
 
Firn, as someone who's been following from the start, stay strong! This is all yet more unneeded evidence that all humans, while incredible and amazing, are REALLY frustrating and wicked.

I agree that the Quest should go to pre-made vote choices, and further, I think there is a wonderful opportunity here: incorporate this change in the story! Let Sabrina recognize that something is different...
 
Back
Top