Ghostdevil
The Devil of Ghosts
- Location
- United States
You realize its likely they will just codify and/or tweak it slightly?...current system is the keyword here. You of course realize we're updating that system with this vote right?
You realize its likely they will just codify and/or tweak it slightly?...current system is the keyword here. You of course realize we're updating that system with this vote right?
Of course, except that nothing in the update suggests that we'd be treating it substantially differently, and there's always going to be a bias towards tradition....current system is the keyword here. You of course realize we're updating that system with this vote right?
It was a mega project were highly unlike to be limited to 'minor' changes.You realize its likely they will just codify and/or tweak it slightly?
You do realize that upgrading our Law won't change the fact that some labor is considered more important than other labor right?...current system is the keyword here. You of course realize we're updating that system with this vote right?
Simple there are some jobs that anyone can do. People that pay in labor do those jobs. People with the skills to make coin pay in coin to avoid somewhat demeaning work. If we need specialist help we hire them.What are you imagining when you say this? I am not being sarcastic. I literally don't get what you mean as to how it would become like a "minimum wage" and why non-coin jobs would have a "flat rate" for what they are paid in.
Why would we change it that majorly, there has been no real overt negative apparent to the ones currently updating it so why would they do anything but codify it?It was a mega project were highly unlike to be limited to 'minor' changes.
True, but I was thinking it more along the lines of the example I gave above, where labor can be paid out doing work on public works, which is easy to track.You do realize that upgrading our Law won't change the fact that some labor is considered more important than other labor right?
It would be rather silly if all labor was made to be worth the same, because that means that a carpenter or a blacksmith's work would be worth the same as someone who carries boxes or something.
I just looked it up to be sure, but all of our martial raising actions cost wealth, so it can be assumed that we pay our warriors in coin.Also Food, even with our best effort at preservation will spoil.
Coins are too rare to cope with a growing economy.
And labor is vulnerable to market shifts as more unskilled/skilled labor shows up.
I suppose it is too late to go full commie and say everything is the property of the king
And what if the Wars last 3+ turns? Very few people would live that long so as to sort things out.
So the carpenter or blacksmith with pay in coin. Paying in labor oddly enough tends to mean that your labor is not valuable because if it was you would have the coin to pay in coin.You do realize that upgrading our Law won't change the fact that some labor is considered more important than other labor right?
It would be rather silly if all labor was made to be worth the same, because that means that a carpenter or a blacksmith's work would be worth the same as someone who carries boxes or something.
Coin and/or luxuries. Do remember that wealth counts in luxuries, unless that has changed and I don't remember it.but all of our martial raising actions cost wealth, so it can be assumed that we pay our warriors in coin.
How would we define public works? What happens when some public works are considered to be worth more than others? Who determines how much public works labor is worth? the Traders would likely consider road work to be worth more than building a governor's palace after all.True, but I was thinking it more along the lines of the example I gave above, where labor can be paid out doing work on public works, which is easy to track.
Yeah, but luxuries can easily be sold for coin or food, so I think that my point still stands.Coin and/or luxuries. Do remember that wealth counts in luxuries, unless that has changed and I don't remember it.
Alright I concede my argument against having Soldier's paying in labor.I just looked it up to be sure, but all of our martial raising actions cost wealth, so it can be assumed that we pay our warriors in coin.
Also, a single person would not be fighting for over 3 generations, they would likely fight until they started getting old and then go back to their farm. Most yeomen would likely only campaign when they have no farming to do and come back during harvesting season.
But why add that level of complication? Are our bureaucrats going to constantly reassess, based on market conditions how many hours of bricklaying is equaivalent to the base tax rate, or are they going to just set a level and keep it regardless of market conditions? Either way can lead to huge problems.The tax option is giving people the choice to pay their taxes thought more options, aka they can pay by either work or money, money, food or money, or food or work or money.
If people can pay via money they don't need to pay be work or food and so on and so forth.
Infrastructure projects and roads obviously. They'd all be counted the same. And the answer to the rest of the questions is the government. You're making this out to be waaaay more complex than it sis.How would we define public works? What happens when some public works are considered to be worth more than others? Who determines how much public works labor is worth? the Traders would likely consider road work to be worth more than building a governor's palace after all.
It seems like something far too complex to do properly right now.
It would become necessary if we want to move to a coin only tax system, yeah.Alright I concede my argument against having Soldier's paying in labor.
Although hopefully we can agree on increasing the types of Coinage instead of only relying on silver and gold.