I don't disagree that Siege Nomads are the rough stuff, but Ram technology? Against strong fortifications supplied by sea where the preferred weapon is the bow? I think not.AN stated in more than one WoG that until ~Enlightenment-era tech or, say, telegraph and railroad, we are not going to control the steppes, full stop.
EDIT: Also, if dominating steppes was easy on earlier tech, people would do it. Buuut until ~16th century Russia, the best way to deal with bordering steppe nomads was prayer. The moment they acquire the most primitive siege engineering skills, out steppe lands are fucked, and there is nothing we can do about it.
All of current nomad wars? They were easy mode. When they get even the basic ram tech, that's when suffering begins.
Ah, dang :/ Does that mean we're building up towards something, or do even the things that just say "additional effects", like blackbirds, actually mean "chance for additional effects", just i guess a higher chance than those?
Hm.They could do it, but considerable
amounts of authority would have to be shifted from the king to the lower level chiefs in order to get the coordination done.
Basically local chiefs could mobilize private armiesHm.
@Academia Nut , how would this authority shifting look like?
Hey @Academia Nut what kind of boats would we get if we pick Portability+Size, we have Dhows now, and what would they become if you don't mind me asking?
Hell yeah! Not!Greeks/Phoneicians/South Americans/Elves/Dwarves/Vikings!!!!
If we have low econ, we have very little at risk from Quality of it's Own. One third of our econ is our MAXIMUM liability. If we have <3 econ, we're immune to martial losses causing econ losses.1. we lost at least one econ to war missions this turn despite only taking 2 martial damage
I'm not so confident that's the way that it works...If we have low econ, we have very little at risk from Quality of it's Own. One third of our econ is our MAXIMUM liability. If we have <3 econ, we're immune to martial losses causing econ losses.