There has never been a case where picking the most logistically and administratively difficult solution in a specifically administrative matter has been the best solution. My apologies for not being specific enough.
I am not entirely sure this is a concept that exists.
Except you are expecting armed men, who sympathize with the men in question, to bring them home without issue. Never give an order you don't expect to be followed after all, and if this order isn't followed things become much more complicated.
You can respect somebody and still say 'I told you so'. In fact, that respect is why it feels so good to do so! Because their opinion actually matters to you. Or at least to me. The 'you' is meant to be general.
... Is there a right way to take this?
And so you want to do it while gathering every negative trait we can possibly grab? Really?
Well, there was already a bandwagon in place, and the option was perceived to be easy/a patch job as opposed to complete dissolution and a rework of the laws (Which sounds like the tax thing all over again).
I was right. Lord Nitpick avoided this segment of quote when he claimed that, too.
Then why are we given the the chance to deal with them ourselves?
You can disagree all you want, but the law doesn't dictate what is or isn't evil.
