Yes, either through transfer actions (1-2 martial and econ per secondary/main action) or by creating a new march (5 martial and 2 econ).
Xantalos was asking about province actions though.
AN already confirmed provinces can take those actions. It's still not very efficient to do.
Oops. Well, I imagine the King needs to make a march, but I'd think the provinces could do the transfers if needed.
Indeed. It'd be most helpful if they could, say, bleed off the excess martial we'd generate if we went blackbird without us having to use actions on it.
Yes, but still a problem, since we'd be spending a half-turn at Martial overcap, which will trigger further issues.
I mean...i think all the options are going to do that, to be fair--even the one we're both voting for is likely to lead to "and suddenly clans are super big and clan heads are super powerful"; i'm less worried because there's also incentive to make new clans for council voting purposes, but it is a potential issue (just, you know, the least bad one in my current opinion)
All of them do yes, but the clan routes will aggregate power by internal forces: i.e. every clan will be doing their own pushbacks and adoptions, whereas the geographical route will aggregate power by top-down forces, which poses a bit of a problem.
There's also gonna be a giant shitstorm as people try to draw the districts. So many arguments over how the borders should be laid out. That's where part of the stability hit comes from, and then the other comes from breaking a system we have had for 1000ish years. The adoption option is a more gradual step towards dissolving the clan structure since it gives more flexibility to clans and people can more freely move between them.
