Or the other way around
The first vision is at 4 months and the second at seven months, so I don't think that can be it.
Timeline is wrong for that- the visions are time stamped which means we know assuming they're accurate we have 'early, rushed invasion' or 'later, prepared invasion' as the options on the table, regardless of if we assume they're mutually exclusive.
Not sure I agree. Our precog has significantly narrowed down the probability space.
Knowing whether we are about to be attacked in seven months by an overwhelmingly powerful Arcosian that the Namekians would be obliged to flee, or in eleven months by a less powerful Arcosian that we could defend them against, sounds like it might be a good use of our time.
Oooh, that's a fair point.
On the other hand, that is ALSO a fair point.
Er... do you mean "I recommend that we seek to make the first outcome happen?" Or do you mean "I recommend that we find out more about the circumstances under which the first outcome would be fated to happen?"
Assuming I let myself reason OOC, my brain is just going to assume that Dazarel has no bloody idea what he's talk about re: Prophecy.
It's unclear how precise this is supposed to be - 7 months or so could totally be 'a year' in some casual contexts. It's also possible that the schedule is messed up by something happening to the fleet, ranging from getting attacked by another fleet or sabotaged or just breaking down from inadequate supplying - meaning that it could be that in both cases the trip takes until 'a year' has passed. The two attacks theory is also fairly reasonable.
This also makes me wonder how viable it is to just... not attack the warlord themself? Though that feels like that's pushing it...
It was more, "I hope I'm right and will push for that cource, becouse that option sounds good."
the choice of planet makes sense. Loyalty IS indeed the one thing you can't really buy, and the unexpected choice is usually so because it's suboptimal.
Funny how Dazarel is for once completely right.
He's being so helpful! I'm surprised.
..i get the first time, but how could it happen to you twice?
and yet Bassoon said it's unlikely they'd be able to hold for more than one month, while the two fleets were 7-3=4 months apart.
...wasn't the old namekian year 4 months long actually? I remember their dragonballs recharging in about that time.
even worse, just imagine if the fact we know of one vision is enough to change the future, so that once we saw the first the future immediately changed to the second, and once we saw the second it changed to the third. In that case looking one more time might very well give us a FOURTH different vision!
Or they have a deer of their own and are responding to our changes
A Namekian can regenerate from just their head, as long as they've got ki. That said, considering the fact that Lord Slug also had a scar over his left eye, it's reasonable to presume that head injuries don't heal as completely as the rest of their bodies.ehi, maybe namekian regeneration is limited to their arms. How would you know?
Rihaku is constant escalation in a way that would make dragonball jealous. Here we're heavily capped by our transformations.
Reminder that it took Vegeta years to achieve super saiyan two; Goku was so confident he couldn't pull it off in a year himself that he didn't even bother trying. And our own opportunities to do transformation training are rather significantly more limited than theirs.
Well the trio of Androids 17 and 18 and Buu have failed to overthrow him, so he's gotta be in the SS3 range I figure.
Then we need to find multipliers and esoteric attack vectors. We've hit a bottleneck on that path, so expand laterally.
Ki Overcharge is literally ten times stronger, at the level we saw. A 10% effective-power bonus is apparently a 50% holistic fighting bonus; if the guy is at nine billion or less, we win. So long as we have a quick takedown option, anyway.