- Location
- Australia
What would it be if not that?
What would it be if not that?
The Frieza Style Analysis counted as an omake. Not even sure you could call this one an analysis since it's coming up with factions.
So I was trying to do the political faction post, but I got stuck on one thing.
How the hell do the Saiyans hide their food consumption? Saiyans eat a lot of food, which needs to be hunted or grown or paid for, which will have an effect on the food market, and people would notice massive amounts of food disappearing or households buying so much more food than they "need". Even if the Masque makes our appetite human level there's still enough time spent as a Saiyan that the above applies.
Does Kakara know of any old Saiyans that aren't reclusive/live in the middle of nowhere?
The Masques need a job to keep the masquerade. It is why Berra works as a mechanic, even though he is also the Lord of Goku.
Speaking of which, what is the deal with Saiyan economy? Does it exist, do they barter or are they communists?
Minimising harm to our enemy means we'd be refusing in-combat opportunities to weaken them and make them less of a threat just because it would hurt them. A more traditional fighting style allows for opportunities to lower the threat level of an opponent to be taken as they come rather than passed by in the case of those that require hurting the opponent.I am unconvinced that we should abandon Pacifist Style. I don't see how making a fight style based around minimizing harm to all involved somehow pushes towards no fighting ever.
Minimising harm to our enemy means we'd be refusing in-combat opportunities to weaken them and make them less of a threat just because it would hurt them.
"To all involved" very much includes "to our enemy" which is the problem. Sometimes we have to hurt our enemy to avoid being hurt. Sometimes we have to hurt our enemy not to avoid being hurt, but because it brings them that much closer to being beaten.
I don't know about Undertale, but I know that Adam Jensen's melee attack hurt people by knocking them out.I don't want us to be a bystander, I just want to be like the main character of Undertale in Pacifist Runs, or Adam Jensen or such.
Every style can be put to non-lethal use so long as the more explicitly deadly techniques aren't used. If we want a style that lets us beat people without killing them, any style will do.I want us to be the queen of non-lethal takedowns and to have a style that reflects that.
Forging a peaceful thing should never be the objective when creating a martial art. If the gloves are down and it's time to fight, it's always better to break out whatever style is most effective. A peaceful fighting style is the equivalent of a ceremonial sword - nice to look at and not useless as a weapon, but an alternative more suited to the task it claims to be good at is better.The Pacifist Style plan is a massive time sink, I envisioned it to take many turns and to be a culmination of Kakara's arc to reform Saiyan Society: taking all the styles which embody the violent tendencies of the Saiyans and forging something peaceful out of them that can nevertheless defend peace.
Simple - to synergise well with Kakara's abilities and thus make her a better fighter. Style creation isn't just for changing Saiyan society or earning prestige, you know.If we we're just going to add another combat style, why should we take the time?
Simple - to synergise well with Kakara's abilities and thus make her a better fighter.
Sure they can be used without problem, but styles with involved techniques reward having a high level of skill in those areas while styles that simply don't penalise them don't.Unless I miss my guess, techniques that aren't penalized can be used with a style no problem, even if they aren't involved techniques.
Didn't say it was shit, just sub-optimal.And @PoptartProdigy hasn't yet said you're correct about Pacifist Style being shit.
Sure they can be used without problem, but styles with involved techniques reward having a high level of skill in those areas while styles that simply don't penalise them don't.
Aren't we deliberately trying not to get too powerful in order to avoid 'starting the countdown' so to speak?It won't be easy, but with our Exceptional Ki Control, the overwhelming yet sustainable power of Golden Ape, and a few years of trial and error, I think we can do it. The advantages of gaining access to the Hyperbolic Time Chamber would be enormous.
@PoptartProdigy : Are these two secretly the same question?
This does seem strange. Even spread across a few hundred thousand people, a single pair of organizations nobody else knows even exist and which are responsible for all technology above medieval while enjoying hundreds of years of collaborative investments should own the planet. They might not want to advertise that fact, but they'd want the power that comes with that wealth to help secure the masquerade and it should be easy enough to make full-time work an optional choice more based on the strategic concerns of the clans than keeping up appearances. The situation should be less Bruce Banner and more Bruce Wayne.
@PoptartProdigy
Would a pacifist style in the vein we've been talking about previously be as sup-optimal as @Andres110 is making it out to be?
General cookie announcement, in fact.
For their work on styles, a cookie each to Andres110 and Bommelom.
For omakes, a cookie to Andres110. Not canon for a variety of reasons, but still interesting and I'll be borrowing some of that.
Aranfan, yours is non-canon as well because I already have a concrete history of the time frame in question.
Also, I'm not giving threadmarks to the non-canon omakes anymore because...well, I don't want to bog down and confuse new readers with what is and isn't canon. It's fairly easy to overlook the "non-canon" notice in the threadmark, after all.
They're not the same question.
You would think that, and some certainly have ambitions that way, but on a societal scale they've never tried.
Because of the accountants.
Their existence is already an audit away from being blown wide open. They have a fun enough time bribing people already to keep that from happening. They don't want to make themselves bigger targets.
Yes and no.
By definition, any pacifist style will be less effective than a style that accounts for lethal takedowns, all things being equal. This is why people are said to be holding back until they're fighting with no consideration as to the lethality of their moves -- that consideration is a restraint that disallows certain actions.
However, that can be gotten around. You're a Seer, and thus have access to ki blocking techniques and a variety of other effects that can boost your combat effectiveness. You can compensate for an always nonlethal style with those techniques.
But, the resulting style will still be less effective than a normal style using the same techniques. Nobody has created such a style, and the question is therefore academic, but it is nonetheless the case. It won't by any means cripple you, but it can complicate an easy fight or make a hard one harder. It won't always, but a skilled opponent can exploit an unwillingness to kill.
This of course assumes that effectiveness translates to winning the fight. It doesn't, always. Whether or not you want a pacifist style is not about how proficient you want to be, it's about solidifying how much Kakara values life.
In the case of anything not a pacifist style, the answer is, "only up to a point."
Pacifism is difficult. Worthwhile? Its adherents say so, yes. But difficult. It restricts your options. So if you want Kakara to value life absolutely, that means sacrificing combat-effectiveness. If you're comfortable with her saying that life is less valuable than certain objectives, then go for a lethal style.
At the end of the day, this is a very difficult question for even adults, and it's what the choice you're debating boils down to.
@PoptartProdigy
The cookie jar has not been updated, and there is no list of learn able styles on the front page.
Would Jaffur's style be on the list of learnable styles or not?