While the lofty near-utopian goals you've set out are something I agree ought to be strived for, specifics like this seem kind of arbitrary. I'm not a qualified psychologist and so can't say whether or not this method of therapy would be useful, but it would take me living in quite a different society for me to be able to trust some random official totally took away a majority of my memories for my own good. And even then, how could I trust in the memories of a society good enough to allow that if I also suspect they could have changed me to believe that in the first place?
This actually might be a process better suited for placement in an afterlife or reincarnation system, at least at the most extreme ends (dealing with people like the Nine and all).
Thanks for the response.
As for that specific example... yeah, I'm not a real psychologist, just half remembered things from Psych 101, my own therapists, personal experience (with normal psych problems, not with mind wipes), and a lifetime of shower thoughts. The memory erasing was a re-occurring shower thought kind of thing as an alternative to execution (especially for a post-mortality society). I wasn't specifically thinking of it that way for Joe to use.
I agree with the idea that in that case some sort of re-incarnation would be preferable. The memory wipe thing would be a poor man's reincarnation, though with the option to retrieve the memories. I'm somewhat leaning towards the 'I think therefore I am' concept of a person *is* their memories, so memory death would be effectively the same as real death, which is why I mention getting them back. In a reincarnation system I would give people the option of regaining past life memories (after they are an adult and only if they want them)
Also, as for the whole 'random official taking away the majority of your memories' thing? That would also be something that would be reserved for people whom real therapy has failed and/or in replacement for execution.
My 'near-Utopia' society concept is heavily flawed I know, but the main trouble is that we keep having flawed humans making the decisions. I don't believe that a Utopia is possible until we have a self correcting system such as a law-making AI (I doubt that we can make a perfect legal/societal system, but a self-correcting one would be a good start)
... Man talking to people is hard. See my signature.
EDIT: added 2 paragraphs
Last edited: