You know, I just ran the numbers, and with the current winning plan, before Policy actions other than the obligatory Dam, we are going to be at 18 Econ. 16 Econ after we lose 2 to SY drain due to Gilded Age stability loss.
That makes me kinda uncomfortable; what is our MP policy going to do with its extra actions? It can take two secondaries to cap out our Econ, but what then? We are spending little enough in our other stats and producing enough that overflow would largely go to Martial, which we don't exactly want (and which MP policy might not do anyways). Are those actions just going to be wasted? Or is the policy going to do something unexpected and possibly unpleasant?
In any case, it is clear that we don't actually need that may Expand Economy actions... which makes me question why we aren't going to Offensive Policy if that is the case.
[X] [Main] Restore Order
[X] [Secondary] Switch Policy - Offensive
[X] [Secondary] Palace Annex - Grand Hall
[X] [Secondary] Dam
[X] [Secondary] Dam x2
[X] [Secondary] Expand Economy x3
[X] [Secondary] Enforce Justice
[X] [Guild] Build Mills
[X] [Guild] Build Mills x2
[X] [Guild Secondary] Survey Lands
If we do this, we will have 22 Econ, with the ability to get more at midturn or via PSN. We also have 3.5 main War missions instead of 1.5.
Do the Levy folks think this would make a reasonable compromise?