Either all the way or none at all, we will be hated anyway so why stop?
Well thanks for further undermining my case...My version of a crackdown is about the same as burning the city and salt the earth. So it's more accurate to call it a purge or massacre.
So far, the 'quest runner' has mostly rewarded doing things the hard way. Not cutting corners and being uncaring about the effects. So I truly believe the best results for our civilization is not the kneejerk option, but the measured response.
We would be losing the chance to gain or not lose stability, losing RA, and losing Legitimacy. After the quest runner has said that losing RA and losing Legitimacy will be requirements to get rid of Purity. This is the hard way.
Nice False Dichtomy there.
Which is exactly what cracking down on them does.
It is called satire, look back our past King Yshuyn. Ask yourself what he said that was wrong.
You're looking at the stats and not the narrative. AN said that before we mediated in an "Attempt to reconcile issues". We'd be just as likely to lose RA and Legitimacy for reversing that decision.
Cracking down on them is like getting a pro-slavery religion to stop enslaving people. It does not remove the religion, only their illegal activities. They will continue to preach about the virtues of slavery and everything will slowly become worse. We need to stop the puritans from preaching religious intolerance if we are to ever get religious tolerance.
Hmhm, so who is bringing RL political issues into this now?
That is not what the action does. If you believe that, you are wrong.
That's what we did the the Monotheists, who were FARMING WRONG because of their religion. We told them they could practice what ever they wanted so long as they farmed correctly.
They are not some random religious group with miscellaneous beliefs. They are specifically a sect of our mainstream religion that preaches religious intolerance. You should not need help to see how smacking down religious intolerance leads to religious tolerance.
Their religion does not tell people to be intolerant of other religions. The puritans' beliefs do.
Okay, that was not what AN said. He specifically said that only monotheist vote wouldn't change things much, but there was some religious tolerance trait behind specific series of choices. One of them was probably accepting refuges normally, which was super dangerous and basically no one argued for.
And they have decided that The Other are at fault.
I don't expect either option to completely eradicate the Purists.
We are not exiling families and children. Stop believing that it does such bad things, because it will not do such bad things. The focus will be on disempowering the ringleaders.
That sounds like a crackdown, not a full purge.
Our entire society believes in the Purity Trait, however there is an extremist group of priests that are taking it too far. They are the Puritans.
Except your analogy breaks down, because everyone in Ymaryn practices Purity. Yet no one else is pushing to eradicate others.
...
Pretty sure they were referring to completely destroying the village here.
I explained the difference earlier. If you refuse to acknowledge or accept it, I don't see why I should continue arguing with you.
Where is this mentioned?
