More stability now means less people doing their Enforce Justices.We are about to lose Legitimacy. That means our subordinates will not listen to the king as much. Loyalty is at the moment more important than extra Wealth.
You logic is the same kind of crap logic and reasoning veekie used to justify ignoring the monotheists."Rip [group of people] out" is exactly what we're trying to fight against! You want to do to the puritans as the puritans want to do to the monotheists; it's basically the same shit. You know how we get Purity to weaken? By having different groups of people with diametrically opposed views living in the same society. That is the hard, but fruitful way.
So we should only crack down on the Puritans for the shit they've been doing, but not persecute them as a group.
Did you ignore what I wrote not just a single page earlier? I even bolded and underlined it.More stability now means less people doing their Enforce Justices.
That's not an argument. "Rip these people out, their making our society disharmonous" is what Purity is all about. You're not gonna change those attitudes if you display those attitudes!You logic is the same kind of crap logic and reasoning veekie used to justify ignoring the monotheists.
Did you ignore what I wrote not just a single page earlier? I even bolded and underlined it.
BE EDUCATED.Except I believe we need the stability-gain only procs if we get the Wealth before mid-turn is over. We are lucky that the Grand Bazaar came online so soon, so we can use it to gain the necessary Wealth before the midturn ends.
Puritans do not like the Monotheists either, but the Monotheists are in support of Ymaryn instead of the Highlander Kingdom. As Loyalty is shown, so it will be rewarded.The majority of these attacks were on marginalized and vulnerable groups like half-exiles, prostitutes, and anyone suspected of harbouring One God sympathies,
You have not been following the recent talks have you? It was a recent Quest. Everyone was excited
Actually we do not have monotheist Agitators.I *think* the tear-out option means to attack puritans and maybe the monotheist agitators, but it *might* mean to attack all the monotheists, even the sane ones, because religious reasoning be crazy like that. Idk, I voted for it but if AN indicates it's the second one I won't be too surprised.
Our monotheists are firmly Ymaryn. As long as we show Lord's Loyalty, they will continue to support Ymaryn and not run off.While some of the One God followers had expressed interest, the same agents that had caught onto the puritan priests had also caught onto these foreign agents, and the memory of Uvothyn was still fresh and many of those affected by his efforts were of the opinion that their single God was a universal deity rather than the god of the Highlanders and thus saw no theological problems with siding with the People rather than the Highlanders. This loyalty was assuredly contingent on the kings continuing to protect them and not interfere with their strange worship and rituals, but still, the early warning either way was of significant use.
This is utter crap. Cracking down on crime is not going to reinforce Purity. Instead of merely shutting down the violent activities of the radicals, we are also imprisoning the violent radicals. The message it will send is not "Rip these people out, their beliefs are disharmonious", it will be "Rip these people out, they are breaking the law and harming fellow Ymaryn." We were told by AN that we need to take -RA and -Legitimacy actions to beat this and you are wrong for contradicting him.That's not an argument. "Rip these people out, their making our society disharmonous" is what Purity is all about. You're not gonna change those attitudes if you display those attitudes!
Well, some Monotheists. Some expressed interest in the whole "down with the heretics" thing.Puritans do not like the Monotheists either, but the Monotheists are in support of Ymaryn instead of the Highlander Kingdom. As Loyalty is shown, so it will be rewarded.
Well consider what gave us the optionAh. If it means facilitating trade between us and Vassals you are right. I was under impression it's just bribing local aristocrats.
@Academia Nut , what exactly "Spread the wealth around" entails? More trade, bribing them or?
What it will do is cause us to lose the trait.This is utter crap. Cracking down on crime is not going to reinforce Purity. Instead of merely shutting down the violent activities of the radicals, we are also imprisoning the violent radicals. The message it will send is not "Rip these people out, their beliefs are disharmonious", it will be "Rip these people out, they are breaking the law and harming fellow Ymaryn." We were told by AN that we need to take -RA and -Legitimacy actions to beat this and you are wrong for contradicting him.
That is a false argument. The reasoning for why one side or another is disharmonious differs greatly between the two sides: one is disharmonious because they are attacking others for being somewhat different, one is supposedly disharmonious because they are somewhat different.That's not an argument. "Rip these people out, their making our society disharmonous" is what Purity is all about. You're not gonna change those attitudes if you display those attitudes!
You are being way too optimistic. If the action fails, the trait will stay as bad as it is and cause serious problems. Better to remove it and replace it with the Religious Tolerance trait we missed out on. Religious Tolerance is a much better trait than Purity and whatever possible thing you're imagining it'll upgrade to.What it will do is cause us to lose the trait.
We want to upgrade it, this is our chance.
Not reallyWell, some Monotheists. Some expressed interest in the whole "down with the heretics" thing.
Some interest was shown, but thanks to our Heroic Mystic King, Lord's Loyalty, and our high Intrigue, we do not have to worry about that.While not directly threatening the Harmurri or People yet, the unease was obvious... and the Highlanders had been sending out agents to contact the One God followers within the People's territory to attempt to get them to 'rise up against their heathen oppressors'.
While some of the One God followers had expressed interest, the same agents that had caught onto the puritan priests had also caught onto these foreign agents, and the memory of Uvothyn was still fresh and many of those affected by his efforts were of the opinion that their single God was a universal deity rather than the god of the Highlanders and thus saw no theological problems with siding with the People rather than the Highlanders. This loyalty was assuredly contingent on the kings continuing to protect them and not interfere with their strange worship and rituals, but still, the early warning either way was of significant use.
This is utter crap. Cracking down on crime is not going to reinforce Purity. Instead of merely shutting down the violent activities of the radicals, we are also imprisoning the violent radicals.
And those who actually do that violence need to be cracked down upon. I mean, what else do you think "crack down upon" means? But "Attempt to tear out these maniacs, root and branch" goes further than a crack down. Root and branch - that would be a persecution of the Puritans then. But the Puritans as a religious group, as long as they don't attack others (and that is what "crack down upon" ensures), have as much a right to exist as the monotheists. If you want the Puritans, as a belief system, as a religious group, removed, then that is actually doing the same as they are doing.That is a false argument. The reasoning for why one side or another is disharmonious differs greatly between the two sides: one is disharmonious because they are attacking others for being somewhat different, one is supposedly disharmonious because they are somewhat different.
I am being realistic. We have been shown that narrative matters in these sorts of decision. The attempt has to be be made.You are being way too optimistic. If the action fails, the trait will stay as bad as it is and cause serious problems. Better to remove it and replace it with the Religious Tolerance trait we missed out on. Religious Tolerance is a much better trait than Purity and whatever possible thing you're imagining it'll upgrade to.
I'm not so certain that would happen. At the end of the day we are aiming for justice and we are doing this to rip out systematic injustice.The real danger is that it might harm our justice value through disproportionate response.
But that is already the "crack down" option. The "tear out" option goes beyond that - tear out root and branch. I.e., tearing out the whole Puritan belief system (which is the root of it) and all its adherents! You want justice, well, then crack down on the crimes! "Root out" is a "persecute group" option.I'm not so certain that would happen. At the end of the day we are aiming for justice and we are doing this to rip out systematic injustice.
Which of these option is most supporting of PiA?Internal Trouble
[] [Int] Expel the One God followers before they can betray you (-2 Intrigue, +1 Stability, reduces potential enemy Intrigue actions, ???)
[] [Int] Ignore the situation (???)
[] [Int] Crack down on the puritans (-2 Intrigue, -1 to +1 Stability, ???)
[] [Int] Attempt to tear out these maniacs, root and branch (-2 Intrigue, -1 Stability, -1 Legitimacy, -1 RA, ???)
I think maybe you are a Russian bot farm agitator aiming to undermine the Progressive Glory of the People.
We need not tolerate the intolerant in order to be tolerant."Rip [group of people] out" is exactly what we're trying to fight against! You want to do to the puritans as the puritans want to do to the monotheists; it's basically the same shit.
You're just wrong. This is the kind of argument that leaves Nazis unpunched.That's not an argument. "Rip these people out, their making our society disharmonous" is what Purity is all about. You're not gonna change those attitudes if you display those attitudes!
I'm not so certain that would happen. At the end of the day we are aiming for justice and we are doing this to rip out systematic injustice.
There is a image that perfectly encapsulates your point of view - or rather, the point of view I take at these words.And those who do actually that violence need to be cracked down upon. I mean, what else do you think "crack down upon" means? But "Attempt to tear out these maniacs, root and branch" goes further than a crack down. Root and branch - that would be a persecution of the Puritans then. But the Puritans as a religious group, as long as they don't attack others (and that is what "crack down upon" ensures), have as much a right to exist as the monotheists. If you want the Puritans, as a belief system, as a religious group, removed, then that is actually doing the same as they are doing.
What we must ensure is that those two groups with diametrically opposed views can both exist in our society. That there is hence no pure Ymaryn, and no pure Ymaryn beliefs.
"Rip [group of people] out" is exactly what we're trying to fight against! You want to do to the puritans as the puritans want to do to the monotheists; it's basically the same shit. You know how we get Purity to weaken? By having different groups of people with diametrically opposed views living in the same society. That is the hard, but fruitful way.
So we should only crack down on the Puritans for the shit they've been doing, but not persecute them as a group.
Ah, so you're just a supporter of political violence. Gotcha.