Why would KH want better relationship with us if in their view non-rational polity ate a trade nation and moved closer?
Moved closer? We moved farther away. We just gained better sea access.
*shrug* We can always salt gift them <3
*husky breath* khem-kun, would you like... a blood-dripped snail?

You also left out abnormal king as potential gain.
I don't view it as a gain tbh. It's interesting but not a solid positive.

And are any of the positives you listed only apply to the reason we used?
All of the positives I applied are in terms of pros/cons in continuing the war.
The past is past; move past it.
 
[X] [King] Embrace the Absurd
[X] [War] Keep fighting (2 Econ temp damage, +2 Econ next turn)

If you're going to walk through a mile of shit, with a mind to get to the other side, ya don't stop halfway through the damned thing.
 
Moved closer? We moved farther away. We just gained better sea access.
*shrug* We can always salt gift them <3
*husky breath* khem-kun, would you like... a blood-dripped snail?

=_= Our land contact remained in place (Gunvalley/Hatvvalley with KH colony) but gaining access to the not!Mediterranean sea jumps our threat rating up to the top of KH chart.

Before both sides are throwing piles of warriors within none-core area, but strait access for us will be indescribable threatening in their view.
 
Either you are advocating for us to make a decision based on sunk costs, or you are rubbing our failures in our faces.
I'm actually putting down a baseline so that when going to War inevitably wins and then likely goes wrong, I have something to add things to later.

We have been aware that this war has been going poorly for a week now. We are hyper aware of what it has cost us.
You say that, and yet I've seen a number of people arguing that they they voted for the and would have voted the same way even knowing how it turned out; in fact, I've seen more of that than I've seen people "oops, guess my vote was wrong".
 
The lesson is not that we should not act from ideology but rather that we should more actively consider things from the PoV of our neighbors alternative value system.
No, the lesson has always been opportunity cost and scenario evaluation and it's a lesson that will never be learned.

This was a pointless war that didn't need to be fought given the drought and our current circumstances, regardless of how well or how hilariously poorly it has gone. We had and still have a billion other things that needed doing with how massively overextended we were and how we were just recovering from another big war.
 
=_= Our land contact remained in place (Gunvalley/Hatvvalley with KH colony) but gaining access to the not!Mediterranean sea jumps our threat rating up to the top of KH chart.

Before both sides are throwing piles of warriors within none-core area, but strait access for us will be indescribable threatening in their view.
If the Khem felt so threatened by us potentially gaining the strait, then why didn't they threaten/warn us? They could've told us not to take it, or flat out threaten to aid the Trelli if we continued the war. All they did was cut diplomatic ties though.
 
=_= Our land contact remained in place (Gunvalley/Hatvvalley with KH colony) but gaining access to the not!Mediterranean sea jumps our threat rating up to the top of KH chart.

Before both sides are throwing piles of warriors within none-core area, but strait access for us will be indescribable threatening in their view.
why? If we wanted to attack them we could just lug our longboats over the river. Attacking their home territory isn't worthwhile. The damage we could cause would gain us much, much more by using the same amount of force to attack the HK, attack KH colonies, etc. Land > loot.

No, the lesson has always been opportunity cost and scenario evaluation and it's a lesson that will never be learned.

This was a pointless war that didn't need to be fought given the drought and our current circumstances, regardless of how well or how hilariously poorly it has gone. We had and still have a billion other things that needed doing with how massively overextended we were and how we were just recovering from another big war.
Ehhhh Why is it a pointless war? We freed slaves; a clear point.

Admittedly we could have done the canal which would have damaged their economics regardless and further weakened their society in the midst of a civil war... *coughs and glances away* I suppose you're right.
 
But they were irrational.
Our gods have smitten someone with a star, are super-against slavery and then we learn that slaves rebel against the extremely bad version of slavery nearby. Ignoring it had all the chances of angering the gods, and we all know what happens when our gods are angered. Clearly, it doesn't work exactly like that, since the war's going poorly and so lacks much of a divine support, but the was a reason to start it.
And we wanted a strait, maybe.
 
I'm sorry Yshyun, you didn't deserve this.
[X] [King] Embrace Madness
[X] [King] Embrace the Absurd
Be free.

[X] [War] Offer reparations for damages and universal manumission of Trelli slaves (-15 Wealth, -1 Stability, chance of further loss, -7-8 Econ Expansion, 7 temp Econ damage, +7-8 Econ next turn, current trader quest fails, ???
Manumission means the slave owners free all their slaves, I googled it. That's all I was looking for out of this, so let's get it. People are more valuable than money.

Who cares about Trelli's land? Our boats work just fine on rivers and there are other trade options. We can always build the canal near Gulvalley to connect to the Khem and we have yet to even explore the lands southeast of our Ham friends.
 
Back
Top