General AreteHey just curious, what do people expect from Life ofBrianArete? Like, what kind of benefits?
The thing is, I don't want that to change- we can NOT just assume that our society will stay the same past every trait change. How do we know LoA won't just give us a lazier noble caste while everyone else is doing all the hard work?
If we take the whole HK, just execute all the royal family and all who can pretend to the throne. Last we saw they were a hereditary monarchy, kill their leaders and the only choices left to the population are either to submit or to fall into anarchy. In the end, hereditary monarchy has a single failure point, once the King's line is dead, everyone who tries to rebel will have no legitimacy at all and will not be able to rally people for a rebellion. Maybe take the heir or other relatives to be wed into our noble families in order to have a legitimate claim on the HK throne.
Because that's the opposite of what it's name implies?The thing is, I don't want that to change- we can NOT just assume that our society will stay the same past every trait change. How do we know LoA won't just give us a lazier noble caste while everyone else is doing all the hard work?
We have no idea what the actual trait will do, and all we have to go on is the name - which implies Greeks. So we look to the Greeks and what do we see? Well, just look at @Susano s posts
Life of Arete. Life of "fulfilling ones function." All it takes is someone deciding their function is to sit on their keister while everyone else puts in the work.
The funny thing is that's not horrible. With completely optimal choices, we'd expect around +10 from a double main.Fun thought, but probably not.
Right now, our most efficient option would be something like
{S} Retraining
followed by
{M} Raise Army
{S} Retraining
on the next turn.
In total, that gets us:
-5 Wealth, +1 Martial, +1 Econ, +6 Culture, +4 Tech
So +7 stats for 2M worth of actions. Not a great bargain.![]()
Let me see if I can tackle this one.The thing is, I don't want that to change- we can NOT just assume that our society will stay the same past every trait change. How do we know LoA won't just give us a lazier noble caste while everyone else is doing all the hard work!
*sigh*Life of Arete. Life of "fulfilling ones function." All it takes is someone deciding their function is to sit on their keister while everyone else puts in the work.
I really want to lose this trait line guys.
Ok. That makes sense, I'm probably just bitter about how we're not as egalitarian as we used to be anymore. Sorry.In the Greeks excellence for the nobles meant philosophy and contemplation, because as a slave driven society they had social systems that encouraged the higher classes to not do physical labor. Arete thus meant they lazed their asses off navel gazing at the worst end of it.
In the Ymaryn excellence for the nobles means social achievement, clerical skill and business acumen. Because as a society with a semi-technical economy and highly intensive government we have an impetus to work. I would thus expect that Arete means we have nobles who do lots of accounting really damn well.
What's basically happening is that as we shift away from the subsistence day to day survival of nomads to the technical economy loss of egalitarian values was inevitable. We are basically seeing a transitory period right now with a drop in those values, which will only start to work itself out back towards egalitarian values once we hit the post industrial revolution.Ok. That makes sense, I'm probably just bitter about how we're not as egalitarian as we used to be anymore. Sorry.
I hope we get an option to make sure the games are open to all contestants
This sounds excellent to meWhat's basically happening is that as we shift away from the subsistence day to day survival of nomads to the technical economy loss of egalitarian values was inevitable. We are basically seeing a transitory period right now with a drop in those values, which will only start to work itself out back towards egalitarian values once we hit the post industrial revolution.
Hypothetically, if we stayed the course with arete line, what I could see us ending up in the post modern era is a highly skill based society. Really the only example I have to draw from is the Life Paths of the Eldar.
Hmmm... Basically if we stay the course and put our all into technical advances we should eventually reach a point where the only things left for our people to really devote themselves too like the arete line demands will be the skilled labors. Basically highly technocratic and... hmm... I want to say Japanese honor based as that is closest to the image in my head.
Yeah it's basically a case that you... sorta saturate things.
That's what the Action Efficiency section of the stat cost post does already.Personally, if I were to get into a scheme to evaluate our options, I'd start from the opposite end, and attempt to estimate the rough value of each action, as opposed to trying to estimate the rough cost of each stat. The only vaguely possible way I can see this, is to try to convert every stat into some sort of fungible value. Unfortunately, the situation is not set up to make that particularly easy.
I read about 15ish pages after the update, then saw after skipping to this page to vote that the current bandwagon switched to Grand Docks?![]()
Sup! How you been reading this glorious thread?That's what the Action Efficiency section of the stat cost post does already.
I'm not willing to include innovation rolls, because any weight I put on them would be completely subjective.