But with tribute we stay KotH? So the legacy still works the next KotH war.
So, how exactly does the narrative work if we give tribute?
Because it's a really weird peace in context of the time. One hand we win because we keep the King of the Hill title and the Khemetri "lose" the Great Power war. On the other hand, we're ending the war by paying tribute. Something that is generally done by the losing side, as evident by the loss of prestige.
Are the Khemetri losing even more prestige than we are if we end up bribing the prince?
Nope. However with the tribute option we hold onto our King of the Hill while the Khem lose theirs.@Academia Nut , does the king still stands legacy have any use or advantage at all outside of a king of the hill war? Even narrative ones?
Aye and we're surrounded by contenders for the title yeah? And we often fight prolonged multi turn wars yeah?But with tribute we stay KotH? So the legacy still works the next KotH war.
AN just confirmed it'll be at least a century of peace. I'm pretty happy with that, and if they come back I'll be even happier to fight them with another century of buildup on our side.
Stop. That choice is in the past and a sunk cost now. The only question that matters is what the best choice is for the future, and getting us out of the war immediately for negligible real cost is clearly it.
What if, instead, we hooked them up? But that would mean peace and diplomatic relations, so better pick one of the peace dealsBecause I want to see the prince and the dragon have more awesome fight scenes...
That would be badass as all hellWe pull it out and give it to a Chosen commander whenever we begin to push the button.
Nope. However with the tribute option we hold onto our King of the Hill while the Khem lose theirs.
This means that given past examples, whenever our neighbors get uppity they will try to attack us using the Take the Crown CB, so the legacy becomes useful then.
Sunk Cost Fallacy. Besides, its real benefit is it makes attacking us a much less attractive proposition.
Not true - it also works for "Take the Crown" Casus Belli, which is literally everyone else.Only a peer power can do that, and they're not exactly common. Almost nonexistent in fact.
Aye and we're surrounded by contenders for the title yeah? And we often fight prolonged multi turn wars yeah?
Because it's a really weird peace in context of the time. One hand we win because we keep the King of the Hill title and the Khemetri "lose" the Great Power war. On the other hand, we're ending the war by paying tribute. Something that is generally done by the losing side, as evident by the loss of prestige.
does the king still stands legacy have any use or advantage at all outside of a king of the hill war? Even narrative ones?
Our commanding general is the Excellent Martial Heir, right? How does he feel our people would respond to us offering tribute to the Khemetri, continuing the war, or acknowledging their superiority?
Sheepy you are partaking too much of the salt today.Aye and we're surrounded by contenders for the title yeah? And we often fight prolonged multi turn wars yeah?
No. It really, really doesn't leave us in a worse position. It gives us time to set up some 10 mercs, develop steel from case-hardening, ride our Population Explosion further, GA, kill the HK, and secure our eastern borders.Or we could just finish things now and not have to go through this whole rigmarole again... People are still apparently super gungho to take out the HKs but the fact remains that the Khems are a far worse threat to us. The current winning option leaves them in a equal or superior position to when they started, and us in a far inferior position. I don't see why people assume time favors us.
It's actually the immediate term favors us, all our attention is finally concentrated in one theatre and we have our Genius here. Odds are very good we finish this.
Top of the page, "Thread Tools" menu. Under that hit "Vote Tally".