TALLY INCOMING! TAKE COVER!
Adhoc vote count started by Motoko on May 21, 2017 at 4:21 PM, finished with 38577 posts and 47 votes.
 
Then build the March as you simply don't have the logistics to hit them otherwise.
How does more Marches improve expedition logistics? Do not even know how to get lots men to The Metal workers territory to hit them? Is one march not enough to help with that? I was under the impression they are mainly a patrol buffer between an angle of attack.
 
What the hell is up with all the Survey votes? Provinces actually are able and willing to do those for us, why do we spend a whole action on it?
 
It's certainly bad, because it doesn't overflow into anything else
...I was under the impression that it was overflowing into, you know, "establish a March as a midturn action instead of having to take a Main action to do it"
...Admittedly, i'm not sure why we don't have the choice to do the Northeast march as well with this, but... *shrug*
 
...I was under the impression that it was overflowing into, you know, "establish a March as a midturn action instead of having to take a Main action to do it"
...Admittedly, i'm not sure why we don't have the choice to do the Northeast march as well with this, but... *shrug*

We have 2 vassal slots. 1 is taken by the Stallion Tribes already.
 
Now that we're maxed on martial can you tell us whether its actually bad for us, or if, like with maxing other stats, its actually good but we're scared of red numbers?

You've never been here before so you don't know, but an increase in border incidents or internal problems seems possible.

How does more Marches improve expedition logistics? Do not even know how to get lots men to The Metal workers territory to hit them? Is one march not enough to help with that? I was under the impression they are mainly a patrol buffer between an angle of attack.

The attacks have to be launched from the March since that's the only place you can station warriors that would have a short enough logistical tail to do so. You could also make a colony, but they wouldn't focus on that and would start with low Martial, making them a juicy target to attack.
 
Provinces will do Survey and Study Health for us with either Balance or Progress, so voting for Survey does not make a lot of sense.
We need an iron mine before the 3rd turn is complete. Surveys are not guaranteed to find what we need. After finding a site, it takes a turn to build the settlement and another turn to build the mine.
As such it makes a lot of sense to take the Survey immediately, so that if it fails we aren't completely screwed.


Yes. They won't take Stability reducing actions, but stuff like Study Health they will take.
Hm...
That means that we can't use the provinces to do Study Metal/Tailings at all. That hurts.

That makes me think that Policy:Balanced is by far our best option, since they'll be able to deal with any outside problems, boost our economy, and establish the settlement.

Turn 1:
[Main] Study <Metal/Tailings>
[Secondary] Change Policy - Balanced
[Secondary] New Settlement - <Iron location>
Provinces:
[Main] Study Health
[Main] Expand Economy (The Law)
[Secondary] Study Stars

Turn 2:
[Main] Build Mine
[Main] Study <Metal/Tailings>
Provinces:
[Main] Restore Order
[Main] Expand Economy (The Law)
[Secondary] Study Stars

This would actually complete all the requirements by the second turn, though it's rather unlikely that everything will work out this perfectly. Still, Policy - Balanced shows its worth here.

@Academia Nut
If a [Secondary] New Settlement is created at an iron site, can it still be used to establish a mine the turn after?
(Despite the fact that at turn start it still wouldn't have paid out its econ)
 
Last edited:
How would they be bored? They are about to go to war, so lets send them off. establishing another march is to patrol away from the action which would be redundant martial generation if we can actually kill/ subdue the nomads.
Also I don't think we would have the option if it was an instant lose /trap option. It might even be converted into something positive rather like stability? or Diplomacy rather than a detriment you thinking. We don't know exactly what will happen but establishing another march could have generate dangerous martial Values and just make more of those "...extra military is going to mean a Civ full of bored armed hot heads without a hobby." over time.

The GM told us that of all our base stats one is unequivocally bad to have over max. I wonder which it could be?
 
[X] [March] Yes, send out the warriors (-5 Martial, -2 Econ)
[X] [Caravan] Attempt peaceful contact
[X] [Challenge] Survey Lands (-1 Econ, improved odds of success)
 
[X] [March] Yes, send out the warriors (-5 Martial, -2 Econ)
[X] [Caravan] Attempt peaceful contact
[X] [Challenge] Study Tailings (-1 Econ, -2 Mysticism, -1 Stability, improved chance of new insights)
 
...I was under the impression that it was overflowing into, you know, "establish a March as a midturn action instead of having to take a Main action to do it"

I was under the impression that our king took over because it wasn't overflowing into anything else & needed to be adressed before it would start causing problems

So basically AN throwing us a bone and not something we should expect from overflowing matrial
 
@veekie , I beseech thee, come hither and talk some sense into the bandwagon! You are our only hope, it seems. :(


Turn 1:
[Main] Study <Metal/Tailings>
[Secondary] Change Policy - Balanced
[Secondary] New Settlement - <Iron location>
Provinces:
[Main] Study Health
[Main] Expand Economy (The Law)
[Secondary] Study Stars


Ehh. AN's reply was to whether they would take Study and Survey on Progress; and while I assume they would do a Survey or two on Balanced, it is unlikely they will go for Study Health.
 
[X] [March] Yes, send out the warriors (-5 Martial, -2 Econ)
[X] [Caravan] Attempt peaceful contact
[X] [Challenge] Survey Lands (-1 Econ, improved odds of success)
 
How would they be bored? They are about to go to war, so lets send them off. establishing another march is to patrol away from the action which would be redundant martial generation if we can actually kill/ subdue the nomads.
You do realize that turns take like 20+ years? Leaving them alone means like 10 years of sitting on their thumbs and even guard duty isn't easy to get. There are no in range nomads. You'll have lots of bored, trained but unused, relative youths with what they think are literal god tier weapons... they will find something to do. They'll attack something or each other or form idiotic political movements giving them something to do. This isn't trap option... its playing chicken with the dice. Forming a March that gets us in range of those nomads is the best option for them. Followed by invading SW, attacking the TS lands (who I think got militarily annexed), invading HK/going merc for HK, internal stupidity.
Also I don't think we would have the option if it was an instant lose /trap option. It might even be converted into something positive rather like stability? or Diplomacy rather than a detriment you thinking. We don't know exactly what will happen but establishing another march could have generate dangerous martial Values and just make more of those "...extra military is going to mean a Civ full of bored armed hot heads without a hobby." over time.
Large numbers of really, bored, heavily armed men are the bane of stability. I don't think booze has been invented yet so they can't just get drunk and break things. This is a social recipe for cunning plans that even Blackadder's idiot minion would question.
 
We have 2 vassal slots. 1 is taken by the Stallion Tribes already.
I know, i meant why we didn't have "yes, establish northwest march", "the northwest is safe enough, establish northeast march", or "dont establish either" as choices
You've never been here before so you don't know, but an increase in border incidents or internal problems seems possible.
Ahh, alas. Does it overflowing have anythign to do with why we got teh establish march chance, or would that have been available this turn even if we had, say, 9 or 10 martial?
The GM told us that of all our base stats one is unequivocally bad to have over max. I wonder which it could be?
Do you have the quote? I remember one about how centralization and hierarchy are bad to redline, but not that quote.
 
[X] [March] Yes, send out the warriors (-5 Martial, -2 Econ)
[X] [Caravan] Attempt peaceful contact
[X] [Challenge] Study Tailings (-1 Econ, -2 Mysticism, -1 Stability, improved chance of new insights)
know, i meant why we didn't have "yes, establish northwest march", "the northwest is safe enough, establish northeast march", or "dont establish either" as choices
Our people want to kill nomads, not prepare for an attack 5 generations from now, that's why.
 
Last edited:
@Academia Nut

You didn't answer my earlier question: how does event chain or challenging beliefs work exactly?

Edit:

Just realized that the Survey Lands isn't part of the Challenge. I'll go with this:

[X] [March] Yes, send out the warriors (-5 Martial, -2 Econ)
[X] [Caravan] Attempt peaceful contact
[X] [Challenge] Study Tailings (-1 Econ, -2 Mysticism, -1 Stability, improved chance of new insights)
 
Last edited:
@veekie , I beseech thee, come hither and talk some sense into the bandwagon! You are our only hope, it seems. :(





Ehh. AN's reply was to whether they would take Study and Survey on Progress; and while I assume they would do a Survey or two on Balanced, it is unlikely they will go for Study Health.

Balanced does whatever needs to be done tho.
Even if they don't Study Health, they can enable us to focus on doing it ourself, by solving Stab issues, or whatever crops up in the interim.
 
OH! OK this is a different march I took a second look and I might have skimmed this small part to discussing because this thread moves ridiculously fast, sorry. I just assume it was the northeastern plan.
There were almost immediate calls to attack, but the actual warriors fairly quickly pointed out that the distance was far too great, and the best that they could do was to begin militarizing that frontier in anticipation of future conflicts. While there had been some plans to send in mostly farmers to the far north-western shore of the sea before, now there were calls to send in a warrior rich group to begin setting up frontier outposts.
Changing vote.
[X] [March] Yes, send out the warriors (-5 Martial, -2 Econ)
[X] [Caravan] Attempt peaceful contact
[X] [Challenge] Study Tailings (-1 Econ, -2 Mysticism, -1 Stability, improved chance of new insights)
 
Back
Top