The whole reason why we want to absorb the Stallion Tribe is because of value drift and the threat of secession. But now, I am kinda meh on that one.

We got a new honor code that isn't based on kin loyalty, and as long we don't ignore the Stallion Tribe and make sure that it is amply supported, we should have no problem with them staying around until it's time to establish a new March.

We need to build trails, though.
The value drift was caused because they kept absorbing nomad tribes and nomad values.

But now they HATE nomads, and they just got a huge population boost from our southern provinces--and with that comes more southern values.
 
Intend matters a lot in these things
And the Intend of both Votes was to provide more defense in the nothern provinces
Therefore I would consider both the same
Fine by me.

I actually don't mind if Main Forest wins. We'll have defensive cover in 3 turns definitively then.
 
Intend matters a lot in these things
And the Intend of both Votes was to provide more defense in the nothern provinces
Therefore I would consider both the same
The question remains, if I haven't missed an AN post, whether Expand Forest-ST will give the Econ boost to us or the Stallions. Because, if it is the later then the two votes should probably be counted separate.
 
I point you to Russia.

The only country to conquer Asia from Steppe to Steppe.

And they were communist.


............
You do realise that they went communist a full century or half a century in some cases, after conquering the last of the Nomads.

The entire Russian expansion was driven by Cossack campaigns, adventurous aristocrats and rapid fuedilisation and orthodoxation of the conquered lands which made them vulnerable to Nomads which starts a new round of conquest.
 
............
You do realise that they went communist a full century or half a century in some cases, after conquering the last of the Nomads.

The entire Russian expansion was driven by Cossack campaigns, adventurous aristocrats and rapid fuedilisation and orthodoxation of the conquered lands which made them vulnerable to Nomads which starts a new round of conquest.
Like I said up all night info soup in the skull. :V
 
The question remains, if I haven't missed an AN post, whether Expand Forest-ST will give the Econ boost to us or the Stallions. Because, if it is the later then the two votes should probably be counted separate.
Not really, even if it doesn't, there was a similar Intend to help the Stallion Tribes when the Votes were made
If the intend would have been simple econ gain, then there would have been other actions that could have been taken
 
Last edited:
They weren't commies when they conquered the Steppe. We also can't really conquer the steppe without enlightenment era logistics and weaponry.


Actually we can, the Russian Cossacks and most nobility of the era where "loyal" independent armies. You don't have to worry about logistics, since there is no connected logistics each square kilometre is its own logistical theatre. Nobility and mounted dispersed militaries where the only way to fight in large land expanses before the invention of the train. It's how empires like Russia and the ottomans and hapsburg Spain could become so large and fight entire campaigns despite it taking a year or more for information to get to the capital.
 
Last edited:
............
You do realise that they went communist a full century or half a century in some cases, after conquering the last of the Nomads.

The entire Russian expansion was driven by Cossack campaigns, adventurous aristocrats and rapid fuedilisation and orthodoxation of the conquered lands which made them vulnerable to Nomads which starts a new round of conquest.

While BungieOni was wrong, what you have written here is, at best, a gross oversimplification.

How the russian steppes were conquered was a mess, with huge swaths of lands "conquered" in name only, additional to that there were de facto independent states that were less connected to the central government than our "march" for centuries, private armies, and cossack "armies" which were nomad tribes by other name.

This is a fascinating and long story that really cannot be summed up shortly.
 
Last edited:
Actually we can, the Russian Cossacks and most nobility of the era where "loyal" independent armies. You don't have to worry about logistics, since there is no connected logistics each square kilometre is its own logistical theatre. Nobility and mounted dispersed militaries where the only way to fight in large land expanses before the invention of the train.

WE WILL INVENT THE WAGONWAY AND HAVE OUR PROTO-RAIL NETWORK AND THE NOMADS ARE GOING TO PAY FOR IT!

Ahem. We basically have military nobility already.
 
Last edited:
[X] [Main] More Carrion Eaters
[X][Secondary] New Settlement - Bleeding Cliffs
[X] [Secondary] Change Policy - Expansion

Onto the bandwagon I hop...
 
Last edited:
Not really, even if it doesn't, there was a similar Intend to help the Stallion Tribes when the Votes were made
If the intend would have been simple econ gain, then there would have been other actions that could have been taken
Mhh, I feel you could argue that Expand Forest - ST should count towards Expand Forest (same defensiv intend as you pointed out), but IMO the reverse is not true. IF Expand Forest - ST where not to return Econ than it is definitly a different vote than normal Expand Forest.
 
While BungieOni was wrong, what you have written here is, at best, a gross oversimplification.

How the russian steppes were conquered was a mess, with huge swaths of lands "conquered" in name only, de facto independent states that were less connected to the central government than our "march" for centuries, private armies, and cossack "armies" which were nomad tribes by other name.

This is a fascinating and long story that really cannot be summed up shortly.


Yes av simplified and as you said the conquered lands where semi independent, but again t in a feudal empire, semi independence isn't unexpected. And that semi independence was "rapidly" squashed as they were settled and "orthodoxiesed" and made more like the Russian West :Immensely powerful feudal Lords at the total mercy of the tzar.

Ofcourse direct control of the area by central government and the dismantling of the private armies near impossible and rendered more so by the technology of the era. But as far as the world and the tzar was concerned the Stepps were effectively Russian lands. Minus a few wars and rebellions.


OK thats a bit oversimplified but it's kinda the gest of it.
 
Last edited:
Oh, and aren't the Stepps rather poor soil for forests? I mean there is a reason the Stepps are a sea of grass without a tree in sight.

So how exactly are we gonna plant a forest?
 
Oh, and aren't the Stepps rather poor soil for forests? I mean there is a reason the Stepps are a sea of grass without a tree in sight.

So how exactly are we gonna plant a forest?
We have access to Black Soil. It's not going to be impossible for us. And once the roots dig deep the forest will begin producing its own nutritious soil.
 
Oh, and aren't the Stepps rather poor soil for forests? I mean there is a reason the Stepps are a sea of grass without a tree in sight.

So how exactly are we gonna plant a forest?
Black Soil Terra Preta bullshit.

Ask @veekie but apparently the entire Amazon is artificial forest that grew beyond it's bounds. There is terra preta evidence going back several millennia.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top