Perhaps a defensive policy is required?This screams 'defeat in detail' to me. All of nope.
[X] [Main] Support Subordinate - Stallion Tribes
[X] [Secondary] Change Policy - Expansion
[X] [Secondary] Proclaim Glory
Can glazed pottery contain acids? because we don't quite have glass yet.
Or, better idea, we drop the "support subordinate" action. Because a minor increase to survivability of our march this turn doesn't help if it destroys our ability to defend it every turn after.
Need to change policy though, we have 4 province actions and only 3 spendable econ. They'll suicide into the steppes if we don't change it.Or, better idea, we drop the "support subordinate" action. Because a minor increase to survivability of our march this turn doesn't help if it destroys our ability to defend it every turn after.
Meanwhile, policy: expansion means we're not fixing our military - which has dropped to six. We need to fix that.
And then the tribes simply fell back one day. Whether their new king had decided that something else was more important or he wanted to fade away to spring back up later or he died and those under him fragmented none could say, just that the tribes faded back into the endless seas of grass.
That, sir, is an astute observation and a very compelling point.We're extremely likely to expand to Bleeding Cliffs with Expansion Policy.
This, however, means you're voting for three secondaries at once. And while nobody is likely to go through the vote counter and nullify your vote as a result, it's still rather unfair of you to do so.
Several of our secondary martial recruitment actions don't use econ.Need to change policy though, we have 4 province actions and only 3 spendable econ.