Regarding "Plan: Seduce 12-year-old Emo Brat", a question:
How exactly does your character know that Sasuke exists?
That depends on how much we know about Konohas potential internal troubles.
Please illuminate us: have we heard about anything like an Uchiha massacre in Konoha? Who was Hokage last we heard? Have we seen any Bingo-books from Konoha lately? What briefings did the jounin give us about Konoha-nin we could meet and what to watch out for?
All these and more are likely questions we won't get answers to until the actual introductory post.
But yeah, a setting-knowledge post would be swell, your highness. <3
Unless you somehow enjoy invalidating crazy, non-sensical plans or watching cunningly over-complicated prematurely crafted plans fall apart based on minor differences in story.
But who would be that evil?
I don't know how much of this is serious or a joke, but the expecting your players to read your mind style of GMing is toxic.
A Rational!Quest is very information driven, but we need at least enough information to know where to ask questions.
Eh it is not that bad. I underestimated just how much you decided to change canon. After all, there is no way our character could choose his village of birth in character.
It is just that Killer-GMs that feed on their players tears are my Kryptonite.
All of it is a joke. Eaglejarl is a jokester. To me this reads tongue-in-cheek.
Extending benefit of doubt and all that. Eaglejarl won't deliberately screw us.
He likes to play the role of the "feeding-on-tears" guy, but he has enough perspective and is well-adjusted enough socially to know not to actually be that guy. Heck, he can write characters that make internal sense with differing motivations and believable conflicts. To do that you have to be able to simulate other perspectives somewhat. That helps on the "accurately-modeling-what-is-socially-acceptable"-thingy.
This change makes sense in a more rational world, and it's not completely out of left-field.
It's good we get a relatively minor(in the big picture kind of way) reminder to double-check our knowledge, and not a complete slap in the face.
Though, as mentioned, looking forward to that background-briefing.