As a GM myself, it ticks me off when people do write-ins for non-write-in votes. Comes off to me as an attempt to wag the dog.
I mean, the whole thing was essentially in which way we said "No", so it's not like we're modifying the content value of the original choice that was given.As a GM myself, it ticks me off when people do write-ins for non-write-in votes. Comes off to me as an attempt to wag the dog.
Oh let people have their flavor, it's just a bit of symbolism.As a GM myself, it ticks me off when people do write-ins for non-write-in votes. Comes off to me as an attempt to wag the dog.
The symbolism being "Doof doesn't know how to play chess"Oh let people have their flavor, it's just a bit of symbolism.
Charades, probably?Which is why we should be playing our game instead. And let's face it, chess is not Doof's game. I'm not sure what, exactly, Doof's game is, but whatever it is, it has a lot more random factors than chess.
I think it's Charades.Doofenshmirtz is playing jenga, blindfolded, convinced he's actually playing charades, while three other people frantically try and pick up the pieces behind him.
Using the screw as a screw instead of as a chess piece also serves as a reminder that Doof's actions aren't going to always fit neatly into predictable patterns. It's not just that he doesn't play the manipulation game, it's that he occasionally tosses everyone playing chess a curveball."Pick up the boxed in screw and use it somewhere in the Inator you're working on."
People in discord are debating what the symbolism of this move even is, so I'm going to over-analyze it in the hopes that we're all mostly on the same page and not miscommunicating.
Anything I missed?
- Picking up the screw is a rejection of the premise -- "I'm not your pawn, David."
- Making the screw no longer be boxed is a rejection of the framing -- "No, you don't have me trapped."
- Taking the screw off the table implies we have the right to move pieces around the chessboard, and are therefore a player rather than a piece.
- Using the screw as a screw, instead of a chess piece, implies that we don't want to play these sorts of games with him -- "I'm an evil scientist, not a manipulator, and I don't much care for the games manipulators play. This sort of underhanded behaviour isn't a good tack to take with me if you want me to be cooperative."
- Doing science reminds him that he's in our home territory, giving a marginal psychological advantage.
- Drawing attention to our -inator reminds him that, far from being a subordinate King more suited to an apprentice role, we're terrifying in our way, just as he is, with our own field that we completely outclass him in. Another psychological advantage.
The most important thing, to me, is that Doof doesn't know he's doing it. Fundamentally, he's feeling off balance, unmoored, and so because he's unsure, he's defaulting to looking at his Inator. The metaphor is there, obviously (though I'm not actually sure whether it was deliberate on Xanatos' part either, to be honest), but Doof doesn't know its there. He's just acting normal, and yes, that normalcy conveys some of the things you mentioned."Pick up the boxed in screw and use it somewhere in the Inator you're working on."
People in discord are debating what the symbolism of this move even is, so I'm going to over-analyze it in the hopes that we're all mostly on the same page and not miscommunicating.
Anything I missed?
- Picking up the screw is a rejection of the premise -- "I'm not your pawn, David."
- Making the screw no longer be boxed is a rejection of the framing -- "No, you don't have me trapped."
- Taking the screw off the table implies we have the right to move pieces around the chessboard, and are therefore a player rather than a piece.
- Using the screw as a screw, instead of a chess piece, implies that we don't want to play these sorts of games with him -- "I'm an evil scientist, not a manipulator, and I don't much care for the games manipulators play. This sort of underhanded behaviour isn't a good tack to take with me if you want me to be cooperative."
- Doing science reminds him that he's in our home territory, giving a marginal psychological advantage.
- Drawing attention to our -inator reminds him that, far from being a subordinate King more suited to an apprentice role, we're terrifying in our way, just as he is, with our own field that we completely outclass him in. Another psychological advantage.
So, the metaphor is that there is no metaphor, Doof just needed a screw.The most important thing, to me, is that Doof doesn't know he's doing it. Fundamentally, he's feeling off balance, unmoored, and so because he's unsure, he's defaulting to looking at his Inator. The metaphor is there, obviously (though I'm not actually sure whether it was deliberate on Xanatos' part either, to be honest), but Doof doesn't know its there. He's just acting normal, and yes, that normalcy conveys some of the things you mentioned.
He needed to escape, and his normal way of coping is doing Inators.So, the metaphor is that there is no metaphor, Doof just needed a screw.
I also imagine the Xanatos Negaquest might have some readers feeling like they just kicked a puppy.You know what this means? We need a Xanatos Negaquest omake about this, complete with over analysis of Doof using the screw as a screw.
I suspect they just didn't think Doof would ever realize, which is relatively reasonable.
True. In which case they're probably raging at the QM for having Doof figure it out right away via a contrived diabolus ex machina.I suspect they just didn't think Doof would ever realize, which is relatively reasonable.
(If they existed, obviously)
It was probably a random event roll, followed by a failed roll to manipulate.True. In which case they're probably raging at the QM for having Doof figure it out right away via a contrived diabolus ex machina.
Doof probably would have an enormous (???) bonus tacked on to his resistance to manipulation due to his newfound clarity, and the Negaquest would probably be raging at fires that come out of nowhere for them to put out.It was probably a random event roll, followed by a failed roll to manipulate.
Probably burning intrigue actions trying to figure out who the hell this "B-Team" even is. They don't even show up in the Disney wiki!and the Negaquest would probably be raging at fires that come out of nowhere for them to put out.
They couldn't be more of Jumba's B-Series, could they?Probably burning intrigue actions trying to figure out who the hell this "B-Team" even is. They don't even show up in the Disney wiki!
We mentioned intitally that those are the most likely persons to fit this role