Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
Voting is open
I mean, my point in bringing up Magnus was that the gods cannot be blind automatons shaped by belief, but have to have some personality beyond the public concious, so that answer is not antithetical to the point I made bringing up Magnus.

I mean they can be shaped by public belief without being blind automatons. We are shaped by our upbringing and culture for instance but that does not mean we are bereft of free will. Let's take Signmar, he can sincerely believe wizards are evil due to the aggregate belief of His worshipers, but he can also believe Chaos and the destruction of the Empire is worse and thus tolerate using said damned people in its defense.
 
Isn't most of the territory inside the borders already claimed by the provinces? de jure if no de facto, Middenland and Nordland might object to laying claim to some of their lands.
The only clear space available is border princes, or maybe Telia and Estila if you you want a proper conquest.
Though current politics, i believe no one in the Empire will object if we want to take a bite out of the wasteland.
Border princes. It used to be called Lichtenber and was part of the Empire.

It is like I am not banging this drum for a long time or anything.
 
Landslide votes always quickly turn into a listless thread picking up totally unrelated conversation topics. So obviously I will dig up an old one.

The thing I've been really wondering is what the reaction is going to be like to the "Ranald stole a Dwarf soul" announcement. Because it doesn't technically state that Mathilde is the Umgi in question, and I genuinely don't know how well others would be able to make the connection, or if everyone already understands it's about her and her new legal status. If it'd be a commonplace conclusion, then our nominally secret religion just got broadcasted everywhere. That sucks, and I am kinda imagining Mathilde's initial reaction of genuine outrage as her secret faith is outed and her humanity is denied to her by a council of stodgy traditionalists that can't accept that a human could be capable of what she has done for the Dawi. If Ranald is entirely behind it, however, I guess she'd accept it, but still it might sting.

That is a good theory for how this happened. Ranald might be willing to take the potential Grudging, especially one that might be ruled to be already paid back by Mathilde, to make this known. It's a fairly large renown boost in a way, people ascribe an insane feat of thievery to him, and it's also accomplished through a clever lie which is equally within his spheres of influence so Bonus Points, and Mathilde gets even more famous.

On that note,

Ranald after receiving an enquiry from the Karaz Ankor Conclave, 2486, colourised:


I just noticed the wording, "an enquiry". Did a Dwarven priest get into contact with a Ranaldite priest and officially inquire Ranald if he did what they are suspecting? Leading to this meme, in which Ranald can't help himself and fucks with the Dwarves, making him the "source of indisputable repute" that convinced them? That's probably it right? They took the God of Trickery at his word?
 
I mean, my point in bringing up Magnus was that the gods cannot be blind automatons shaped by belief, but have to have some personality beyond the public concious, so that answer is not antithetical to the point I made bringing up Magnus.

And in any case, I thought the reason he had to prove his faith was because his fate was refuted by the priests and worshippers?

I mean it's possible Human gods are a mixture, shaped by the belief of mortals that worship them but not wholely shaped by them.
 
And while were talking of Ranald and any hypothetical soul thefts...
Who does a free floating soul belong to? Does Karaz Ankor, or the Ancestor Gods, lay claim of ownership to all dawi souls?
Is Hashut a thief for taking dawi zhar souls to himself?
Did Ranald answer the enquiry by denying any allegations of taking any dawi souls from the glittering realm, while leaving open the possibility he might have grabbed one waiting for reincarnation?
 
I mean they can be shaped by public belief without being blind automatons. We are shaped by our upbringing and culture for instance but that does not mean we are bereft of free will. Let's take Signmar, he can sincerely believe wizards are evil due to the aggregate belief of His worshipers, but he can also believe Chaos and the destruction of the Empire is worse and thus tolerate using said damned people in its defense.
I mean it's possible Human gods are a mixture, shaped by the belief of mortals that worship them but not wholely shaped by them.

These are fair points and do make sense, but even so, it comes full circle: the question isn't "where do gods come from" but "why do they act the way they act". If gods have a developed personality, they shouldn't allow strong important moral contradictions in the practice of important strictures while blessing everyone on all sides, even the hypocrites. If they have no developed personality, well, this goes very contrary to their actions with Magnus and the Ronald letter being actions of explicit persnal preference.

I guess they could just be so big they do not notice much except for the big historical waves, acting like passive winds any priest can scoop up and use, and that the reason Magnus and Mathilde get noticed is because they are in the middle of said waves... but... Ranald consoled us personally before we made any really big waves. Any theory I can think of comes with a contradiction.

Maybe Ranald in particular, due to his nature, hears even the little folk, like my omake implied, but others do not? Then again, he also allows blatant contradictions... though... maybe he punishes people subtly and karmically instead of being showy, so no one notices his interventions? Its a big stretch, and it implies a certain difference in approach between gods that care about every prayer and ones that can only look at the big picture, ignoring the conduct of most ants that scoop some of their power, but its the only theory that can be stretched enough to not be contradicted.
 
Last edited:
If gods have a developed personality, they shouldn't allow strong important moral contradictions in the practice of important strictures while blessing everyone on all sides, even the hypocrites

I don't see that this need be the case, Gods even more than humans are vast, and can contain multitudes. If two sects have disagreements but both still fall enough into the Venn diagram that represents the god, then let them duke it out.
 
That's basically Cythons position the matter. Or to be more precise, it's the corollary to Cython's take that Winds are just Gods with less personality.

Though it should be mentioned that there is a flaw in that argument, daemons using Wind magic. If you posit that the winds are gods than they must be at least inclined towards self-preservation, which is to say opposed to Chaos, because 'no world, no winds'. Yet you have lowly daeonettes of Slaanesh using Ulgu.
 
Though it should be mentioned that there is a flaw in that argument, daemons using Wind magic. If you posit that the winds are gods than they must be at least inclined towards self-preservation, which is to say opposed to Chaos, because 'no world, no winds'. Yet you have lowly daeonettes of Slaanesh using Ulgu.
There's plenty of ways to explain that. Maybe they don't have the attention to spare so they don't notice, maybe doing something about would cost too much. Maybe they aren't inclined to self-preservation, or maybe they don't see that as threatening. Or maybe it doesn't threaten them, the winds are born at the heart of Chaos' power, and still exist. Chaos taking over the world would only make the rest of the world like that.

Or maybe it differs by Wind. Ulgu doesn't care, but some of the other do, and that's why daemons can't use those winds. I don't think so, but there's enough unknowns that it's possible.
 
There's plenty of ways to explain that. Maybe they don't have the attention to spare so they don't notice, maybe doing something about would cost too much. Maybe they aren't inclined to self-preservation, or maybe they don't see that as threatening. Or maybe it doesn't threaten them, the winds are born at the heart of Chaos' power, and still exist. Chaos taking over the world would only make the rest of the world like that.

Or maybe it differs by Wind. Ulgu doesn't care, but some of the other do, and that's why daemons can't use those winds. I don't think so, but there's enough unknowns that it's possible.

A Lord of Change can in fact use all winds so we know it's not the last at least.
 
Yet all their cults, even the abhorrent ones like the Norscan Ulric cult that also worships chaos, and the ones that clearly contradict each other not only in their conception of each god but also in their practice, get equal access to piety and miracles.
I think there's a distinction to be made between god-granted miracles and priest-channeled miracles.

God-granted miracles happen at the gods discretion, that's clear. But priest-channelled miracles happen at the discretion of the priest using power drawn from the god.

We've already seen that power can be drawn from an unwilling god once a channel has been established, and that was a very temporary channel.

So priest-channelled miracles might not require the approval of the god in question at all, merely that the miracle match the flavour of the god whose power they are drawing on.
 
Last edited:
The big part missing from Winds being gods are their Windy miracles, worship from sapient beings and so forth. They're more like gravity, and AFAIK people don't really try offering worship to general relativity or string theory.
 
The big part missing from Winds being gods are their Windy miracles, worship from sapient beings and so forth. They're more like gravity, and AFAIK people don't really try offering worship to general relativity or string theory.
If the winds are gods then they're a category of gods distinct from both the human gods and the chaos gods - one unconcerned with the mortal races entirely.

From the viewpoint of them as gods their miracles are more along the lines of "where Ulgu pools mists form" and "where Ghyran pools plants grow" than "where a human is in desperate need of aid against the winter, Ulric saves them"

EDIT: I don't find it plausible that they are gods however, because of the fact Aethyric Vitae solely influenced by one wind became all eight winds. Not something we would see unless the eight-way split is somehow inherent rather than being the product of eight collaborating deities.
 
Last edited:
I think winds are not gods because they don't have Consciousness/higher toughts.
 
I think there's a distinction to be made between god-granted miracles and priest-channeled miracles.

God-granted miracles happen at the gods discretion, that's clear. But priest-channelled miracles happen at the discretion of the priest using power drawn from the god.

We've already seen that power can be drawn from an unwilling god once a channel has been established, and that was a very temporary channel.

So priest-channelled miracles might not require the approval of the god in question at all, merely that the miracle match the flavour of the god whose power they are drawing on.
On the other hand, Kasmir's current theory is that his failing to save Abel was Sigmar's will, which seems to run counter to this theory.
 
I think there's a distinction to be made between god-granted miracles and priest-channeled miracles.

God-granted miracles happen at the gods discretion, that's clear. But priest-channelled miracles happen at the discretion of the priest using power drawn from the god.

We've already seen that power can be drawn from an unwilling god once a channel has been established, and that was a very temporary channel.

So priest-channelled miracles might not require the approval of the god in question at all, merely that the miracle match the flavour of the god whose power they are drawing on.
There's definitely been implications before that priests that lose the favor of their deity enough lose the ability to cast their spells. I think this is specifically brought in cases like that one Shallya sect that kills people to fight plague.
 
There's definitely been implications before that priests that lose the favor of their deity enough lose the ability to cast their spells. I think this is specifically brought in cases like that one Shallya sect that kills people to fight plague.
Could be a matter of degrees - if you're channeling power from a god that likes you it'll often be easier. From one that doesn't care for you, standard. From one that dislikes you? An occasional penalty. If they absolutely despise you? Then they put in the necessary effort to cut you off.

Ulric clearly hates "people surviving-the-cold by working with others who call on Chaos" less than Shallya hates "people claiming to encourage health by killing plague victims"

On the other hand, Kasmir's current theory is that his failing to save Abel was Sigmar's will, which seems to run counter to this theory.
Most obvious explanation: He's wrong.

His failing to save Abel was a failure on his part to connect to Sigmar in order to channel said power, not Sigmar actively denying him. OOC the "lack of confidence -50" malus definitely suggests that at least part of the failure was on him.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps Kasmir was perfectly capable of healing Abel but Sigmar actively prevented it.
Which means that a God does in fact have influence over what powers their priests exhibit.

... Unless Sigmar directly made an anti-healing miracle, I suppose.

It would seem like something of an own-goal for Sigmar...
It's Kasmir's own belief.
"Congratulations," he says, and seems to mean it. He looks at you for a long time. "There's an old belief. I think it originally came from Norsca, and was adapted to Ulric, then to Sigmar. It says if a man is struck by lightning and killed, it was because the God needed his assistance urgently."

You try not to scowl, then stop trying. "And you think-" you begin, then stop.

"I have to." He looks at you, and the belief in his eyes isn't the shining rigid belief of the Kasmir you knew, but just as dulled and battered as his armour. "I've spoken to Morrites, but they can't or won't tell me much. I don't know if Abelhelm is sequestered within Morr's realm or if he's by Sigmar's side. But the only possible reason that I can see for him not healing Abelhelm is that he's doing more good there than he could here." You can think of another explanation, but you manage to swallow it down, but your thoughts must have shown on your face. "I have chosen to believe that. I spent some time thinking that Sigmar was either neglectful or uncaring, and perhaps that is the case. But for the past..."
Which makes Mathilde's current feelings about the so-called deity justified by the words of a direct member of the Sigmarite church.
 
Question: can someone give me the details about Silver Arrows of Arha, in terms of its stats and lore? Given that Max's use of a crossbow as a focus for turning the spell into a magical machine gun, it has me wondering about the spell.
 
Voting is open
Back
Top