Well thats true, but I'd note that the threat is well known in general, just that people once again applied modern sensibilities to a medieval/renaissance period environment, it was argued and quite solidly.
Ultimately it lost to an unrelated matter, since the key push was on Vitae research/Temple building, and the other discussion points were ornamental.
No, it didn't lose to Vitae Research/Temple Building - because it was an EIC action, it lost to the long argued for Internal Security action for the EIC - something that was likely to win for similar reasons of pushes for AV. It also lost because advocates could not come up with a convincing argument why pre-emption was necessary since the scale of this threat was unknowable to advocates.
In any case,
piracy was only one example of my argument for the rumor mill,
not the argument itself. The argument itself is that we can't begin to even access the magnitude of many things we are being asked to make decisions on, because we have no access to any information network. For example, we are basically approaching the Al-Ulric from a position of very limited knowledge of what is exactly going on within Nordland and Middenland, only that the two provinces are gearing up for an inter-provincial war.
I think without building an information network, pre-empting matters are going to be very hard - even judging whether it's worth Mathilde's 0.5AP to do so is difficult, because no risk-reward assessment can be remotely conducted on the "oh threat X has opened an option to respond with action Y". Well, how big is threat X? How fast is it growing? How urgent is it that we respond to threat X? Are there other movers and shakers planning and fully capable of responding to threat X anyway, so we can afford to wait? Minus the info network, I suspect the QM's response would be: Mathilde has no way of knowing these things as of now, a reasonable stance, but one that probably makes debating over decision making an activity built on biases and unconfirmed assumptions.
It
isn't enough that we know an issue exists when we don't know the dimensions of the issue. It might or might not be Mathilde's job to intervene, but in the absence of information infrastructure, debating whether it should be done is operating on little information.
I do think depending on what the Al-Ulric wants to meet with us for, the urgency of building up an external-facing information network via the EIC may well increase with the coming turns, now that the Eight Peaks is secured. Even the rumor mill alone is likely to provide alot of context the thread is so far having to extrapolate from fishes that happened to jump onto Mathilde's boat.
In any case, the origin of this issue laid with the initial question of whether Mathilde knows about the sentiments of other Dwarf Holds, regarding the effects of the reconquest of the Eight Peaks. While one might argue that
strictly speaking, Mathilde the Loremaster doesn't need to necessarily know about this information, Mathilde the Grey Wizard operating in Karaz Ankor may be well served to at least know what the general Dwarven public is saying about the Eight Peaks, since there's always a potential that she is going to play a role in Dwarven Politics through her decisions, as she did during the Battle of the Caldera when she send a Gyrocopter to Thorgrim. In a time before mass media, Mathilde's grasp of current affairs is going to be dependant on the information network she has access to (as seen by the aforementioned question posted to BoneyM and his answer), and I don't think anyone could argue against Mathilde having more awareness of Current Affairs, especially after this turn.
This is not an argument for Mathilde doing other people's job, one could argue as a Grey Magister, being informed
is Mathilde's duty. Being informed is not a decision nor obligation for Mathilde to intervene, it is a means of judging the wisdom of such a course of action.