[X] [DEPLOY] No Free Lunch for Inflictor
-[x] Recall USS Courageous & USS Sarek from Explorer Duties to the Romulan Border Zone
-[x] Sol - USS Excelsior to Transfer to Romulan Border Zone, 2 Constellations to Andoria
-[x] Vulcan - USS Charon to Transfer to Kingon Border Zone
-[X] Tellar - 1 Constellation to Klingon Border Zone, 1 Miranda to Andoria.
-[X] Klingon Border Zone - 2 Soyuz to Tellar
-[X] Andoria - 1 Soyuz to Sol
Seems I mixed that up with the number of Mirandas? Thanks, corrected.There is only 1 Soyuz at the Klingon Border Zone right now, so how are you transferring 2 to Tellar? Currentt Klingon deployment:
- Currently, 1 Constellation (3), 1 Soyuz (1), 2 Miranda (4)
Or ... for that matter ... if that hideous half-life, half-death existence as self-aware bio-circuitry even counts as death in battle, or merely something worse than death?Something that might explain the silence on the Klingon side exept for medical is the question , which might still need a ruling, if dying to the biophage counts as a honorable death as it is inteligent or not and so about the entrance into Sto'Vo'Kor.
So I'd like to make a more complete argument for picking Ainsworth.
Detecting cloaked ships is important, but that roll will happen relatively few times. +1 Shields will affect every single ship that's fighting.... and we're sending quite a fleet! Is it better to do well on a few detection rolls, or to be able to take nine extra hits if there's a fleet battle? Remember, all ships have been ordered to keep their shields up at all times, so an out-of-nowhere Alpha strike is less dangerous than it would be normally.
The few detection rolls are more important, I would rather lose half our fleet than Ten Billion civilian lives. What if we let one slip through? Extra shield rolls aren't going to matter when your family is swallowing blood tentacles.
Agreed on the first three, but after that xenopsychology, then sensors. Medical can wait until the specialist team is done with the biophage research. It's a bit premature to talk about that now, though.I think this would be a good priority list for our next turn of research:
1. Biophage
2. Computing
3. Communications
4. Medical
5. Sensors
6. Shields
I generally like them a lot. One thing that might make it even more interesting would be differentiating between things that are unpopular and things that are difficult/expensive, maybe some requests like shipyards and starbases should have a resource cost in addition to pp?By the way, what do people feel about the mechanics used by the Federation Council turns? I'm currently nailing down some of my mechanics for things such as war-time/crisis turns and want to see what people have liked and disliked with the mechanics to try to make this enjoyable and not frustrating for people.
Something that might explain the silence on the Klingon side exept for medical is the question , which might still need a ruling, if dying to the biophage counts as a honorable death as it is inteligent or not and so about the entrance into Sto'Vo'Kor.
@AKuz and I have a theory that the Klingon regime seen in TOS and the TOS movies, in tune with being the Soviet analouges, are actually an abnormal government that overthrew a lot of traditional Klingon elements -- see Azetbur (sp?) succeeding the Klingon Chancellor despite the fact that in TNG women aren't permitted on the high council. Basically, instead of being medieval feudalist, the TOS Klingons attempted to establish a more controlled central authority based on merit and calculating rationality versus the honor-based and warrior traditions of the past, which we know existed in Enterprise. It would actually explain a lot if this is the case, including why the Klingons are so extreme in TNG onwards - it's a bunch of reactionaries running around.On an off note though, I will say that I prefer the TOS Klingons to TNG ones; they're still a warrior culture, but one that's significantly more predatory. In a way, not unlike the Samurai, in that deception and traps on field of battle aren't really cowardice as long as you get to fight and kill the other guy. But then again, my favorite Klingon was Chang, so...
Personally I headcanon that Andorians actually have only between one and three "sexes" and their genders are more like social roles that grew out of their four-way arranged marriages to secure alliances between ice fortresses with highly advanced medical technology to ensure that the resulting children are the product of all four parents.
@AKuz and I have a theory that the Klingon regime seen in TOS and the TOS movies, in tune with being the Soviet analouges, are actually an abnormal government that overthrew a lot of traditional Klingon elements -- see Azetbur (sp?) succeeding the Klingon Chancellor despite the fact that in TNG women aren't permitted on the high council. Basically, instead of being medieval feudalist, the TOS Klingons attempted to establish a more controlled central authority based on merit and calculating rationality versus the honor-based and warrior traditions of the past, which we know existed in Enterprise. It would actually explain a lot if this is the case, including why the Klingons are so extreme in TNG onwards - it's a bunch of reactionaries running around.
If you go with this interpretation the switch to TNG Klingons should probably be happening right around... now.
I would dispute that. TOS Klingons are more cunning but it is reinforced even as late as DS9 that Klingons are not to be underestimated or fucked with. Despite persistent memeing to the contrary and a frankly misguided idea that the Federation is some USA-style Hyperpower, it is 100% canon that had Rachel Garret not sacrificed the Enterprise-C the Federation, even militarized, was going to get it's ass fucking kicked by the KDF in the 2360's.It does seem that the Klingon Empire of TOS is a much more dangerous beast than the TNG Empire
I dunno. I know Enterprise suggests that the Klingons afflicted by the Augment virus might behave differently but I think that's not really borne out (also, it's stupid, and that's from the guy who does consistent Enterprise apologia in this thread). Koloth, Kang, Kor were legendary heroes before and after they got their ridges back, and Jadzia never comments on how they've changed from the TOS days due to some genetic re-sequencing. I suspect the re-ridging was more cosmetic than anything - the difference in Klingon behavior suggests something more of a cultural/political attitude. You could interpret uh -- whichever one of those 3 is in Day of the Dove 's attutide in said episode as reflecting this. He's tired of all the cunning and the manipulation and now he wants to get back to good old warrioring.However - given that the whole reason for Klingons having flat heads is now supposed to be that they stole human Eugenic Superman DNA and creating cross-breads, it may also be that the TNG Klingons don't just act dumber - they actually ARE dumber than the TOS Klingons.
@AKuz and I have a theory that the Klingon regime seen in TOS and the TOS movies, in tune with being the Soviet analouges, are actually an abnormal government that overthrew a lot of traditional Klingon elements -- see Azetbur (sp?) succeeding the Klingon Chancellor despite the fact that in TNG women aren't permitted on the high council. Basically, instead of being medieval feudalist, the TOS Klingons attempted to establish a more controlled central authority based on merit and calculating rationality versus the honor-based and warrior traditions of the past, which we know existed in Enterprise. It would actually explain a lot if this is the case, including why the Klingons are so extreme in TNG onwards - it's a bunch of reactionaries running around.
If you go with this interpretation the switch to TNG Klingons should probably be happening right around... now.