- Location
- Mid-Atlantic
I definitely support doing four pushes. We NEED pushes. Badly.
Briefvoice, I don't oppose getting in another berth here or there. But I do think we need to recognize that there are a lot of other things that are frankly more important, and should collectively take up the great majority of our available political will. Maybe nine points (a high single-digit percent of our total upcoming budget) is a reasonable amount to spend, maybe it isn't. Dunno. We'll take that up in the snakepit.
Me... as I understand it (I wasn't participating then), the whole point of spending the huge political willpower windfall we gained from beating the biophage on Utopia Planitia was that it was supposed to enable our shipbuilding infrastructure to be "good enough" for quite a while.
And it seems to have worked. You should congratulate yourself, and others, on having successfully lobbied for a shipyard infrastructure sufficient unto the needs of the Starfleet.
So basically, let's call my notional ship with its impossible half-integer stats the USS Bastardized Innumerate (an accurate description). We'll call your "why Simon is wrong" medium cruiser... the USS Simon Is Wrong.
Now, comparing Simon is Wrong to Bastardized Innumerate, your cruiser has...
1) A much squishier hull than mine. Other stats average to a bit better. Non-hull stats on the Bastardized Innumerate average 5.5, yours average 6. Overall, mine average 5.5, and so do yours.
2) Significantly lower SR cost than the "bastardized innumerate," slightly lower BR cost. Also, cruiser build time, which I wasn't confident of when I started my take on it.
3) A crew that takes significantly less officers and enlisted than I crudely 'predicted,' but also significantly more techs- the one group we keep running out of.
4) Reliability comparable to what the Renaissance has, and what the Ambassador probably SHOULD have if we time things so that the prototype is ready in 2325 as in canon, instead of trying to rush it and get started right this minute.
5) Lighter weight than my "bastardized innumerate," but not enough lighter that we can fit the thing in anything other than dedicated two-megaton cruiser berths that don't exist, OR three-megaton berths we'd need for Ambassadors.
I don't disagree that USS Simon is Wrong is objectively a better ship than the USS Bastardized Innumerate. Which is totally unsurprising, since Bastardized Innumerate obviously cannot exist just by virtue of occupying a midpoint between the Ambassador and Renaissance canon designs. And Simon is Wrong HAS got stats competitive with an Excelsior, at a lower cost...
But as I already pointed out, the Excelsior is a twenty year old design. I honestly doubt that the USS Why Simon is Wrong would have much practical advantage over an Excelsior-A refit. Also, if we tried to build any great numbers of them, we would start to run short of techs- the same problem we have with the science vessels.
So personally, I think that you've proven me wrong about the exact stats of the ships (which anyone with a brain knew would be wrong). But not about the original point my deliberately crude example was intended to make.
Briefvoice, I don't oppose getting in another berth here or there. But I do think we need to recognize that there are a lot of other things that are frankly more important, and should collectively take up the great majority of our available political will. Maybe nine points (a high single-digit percent of our total upcoming budget) is a reasonable amount to spend, maybe it isn't. Dunno. We'll take that up in the snakepit.
Me... as I understand it (I wasn't participating then), the whole point of spending the huge political willpower windfall we gained from beating the biophage on Utopia Planitia was that it was supposed to enable our shipbuilding infrastructure to be "good enough" for quite a while.
And it seems to have worked. You should congratulate yourself, and others, on having successfully lobbied for a shipyard infrastructure sufficient unto the needs of the Starfleet.
First, let me note that YES, trying to predict the stats of a hypothetical custom ship by averaging those of two existing ships is not actually a valid model. It is a crude approximation I made in order to get a point across.You can't run ship design analysis this way and get anything meaningful, It's basically completely wrong.
Note the 6's in everything outside of hull which sits at 3. 98% reliability is better than what we can achieve on the Ambassador with current tech using the same saucer and secondary scale Oneiros showed us for the Ambi in the example ship project.
So basically, let's call my notional ship with its impossible half-integer stats the USS Bastardized Innumerate (an accurate description). We'll call your "why Simon is wrong" medium cruiser... the USS Simon Is Wrong.
Now, comparing Simon is Wrong to Bastardized Innumerate, your cruiser has...
1) A much squishier hull than mine. Other stats average to a bit better. Non-hull stats on the Bastardized Innumerate average 5.5, yours average 6. Overall, mine average 5.5, and so do yours.
2) Significantly lower SR cost than the "bastardized innumerate," slightly lower BR cost. Also, cruiser build time, which I wasn't confident of when I started my take on it.
3) A crew that takes significantly less officers and enlisted than I crudely 'predicted,' but also significantly more techs- the one group we keep running out of.
4) Reliability comparable to what the Renaissance has, and what the Ambassador probably SHOULD have if we time things so that the prototype is ready in 2325 as in canon, instead of trying to rush it and get started right this minute.
5) Lighter weight than my "bastardized innumerate," but not enough lighter that we can fit the thing in anything other than dedicated two-megaton cruiser berths that don't exist, OR three-megaton berths we'd need for Ambassadors.
I don't disagree that USS Simon is Wrong is objectively a better ship than the USS Bastardized Innumerate. Which is totally unsurprising, since Bastardized Innumerate obviously cannot exist just by virtue of occupying a midpoint between the Ambassador and Renaissance canon designs. And Simon is Wrong HAS got stats competitive with an Excelsior, at a lower cost...
But as I already pointed out, the Excelsior is a twenty year old design. I honestly doubt that the USS Why Simon is Wrong would have much practical advantage over an Excelsior-A refit. Also, if we tried to build any great numbers of them, we would start to run short of techs- the same problem we have with the science vessels.
So personally, I think that you've proven me wrong about the exact stats of the ships (which anyone with a brain knew would be wrong). But not about the original point my deliberately crude example was intended to make.