I will come down down on the side of:
-1 Enterprise at a time.
- That Enterprise must be in the EC
- If all other EC vessels have been replaced with the newest explorer class Enterprise is to be retired as a museum ship of that era of Exploration and her crew transferred to a new Enterprise of the new class.
- This is provided that the Enterprise isn't lost in the line of duty.
Me approves.
Which raises the question here of what to do if Enterprise-B is lost now or soon. If she gets Mirachted now or during her next mission and we haven't even started the Ambassador project yet.
Do we move another Excelsior class (Or do the San Paolo-Defiant thing and rename an existing ship) or do we wait a decade and a half (Six months to a year real time!) To build the Enterprise-C as an Ambassador class?
I don't think we should do the
Sao Paulo thing since we have a steady production run of
Excelsiors in the pipeline. The
Excelsior that Commodore Leslie's working on over at Ana Font is already allocated to the Explorer Corps, for instance.
I think you could make a case for waiting and naming the lead ship of the
Ambassador-class the
Enterprise-C. Honestly... I think that should be a thing
@OneirosTheWriter puts up to a thread vote, because I think a lot of people will have opinions about.
Wait and build an Ambassador-class. We ought to be starting the Ambassador prototype first thing next year*, and in the meantime I trust the Courageous to carry the banner for the Federation.
*So probably more like 12 years until the first non-prototype Ambassador comes off the line.
Enterprise:
"Uh, and
Sarek. Nobody gets to slight her except me. So there."
[scowls]
I can also plausibly see renaming the Enterprise (TO LAKOTA???) if we pulled her off EC service a la the Cheron and recommissioning the hull number as an ambassador
That would be a logical move if we've shifted the rest of the Explorer Corps over to
Ambassadors, but it seems unlikely we'll reach that point prior to, oh, the 2330s at the earliest.
The Federation would survive a few years without an Enterprise in service. It just means commissioning a new ship with that name will be all the sweeter.
Can, and has; there was at least a 10-15 year hiatus between the loss of the
Enterprise-C at Narendra and the commissioning of the
Enterprise-D.
....Unless we do two parallel prototype Ambassador builds in parallel for that sweet sweet Chen bonus and name one of those Enterprise!
You know,
strictly there's nothing stopping us from naming the
Ambassador prototype
Enterprise-C, and this doesn't actually require us to do anything goofy like call the entire class the
Enterprise-class. That kind of renaming isn't actually unusual, especially in situations where an old ship lost unexpectedly is being commemorated with new construction.
I think it's ok to have a gap, but obviously the shorter the better. I don't support an overlap or renaming.
A renaming would
ONLY make sense if there were good and compelling reasons for us to retire the
Enterprise-B out of Explorer Corps service and into regular fleet service. It's hard to imagine circumstances where that would be a logical course of action arising easily.